Nevada
SB161
SB161 - Revises provisions relating to local government employees. (BDR 23-34)
Source: LegiScan ·
4,438 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
-
83rd Session (2025)
Senate Bill No. 161–Senator Nguyen
CHAPTER..........
AN ACT relating to local government employees; establishing
additional procedures pursuant to which parties to a
collective bargaining negotiation involving a school district
and an employee organization representing teachers may
submit issues to a binding arbitration process; prohibiting a
school district or any agent thereof from requiring, requesting
or urging a teacher to work more than a certain amount of
time under certain circumstances; revising the penalties that
may be imposed upon an employee organization representing
teachers, the officers thereof and teachers for participation in
a strike; revising the conduct that constitutes a strike; revising
provisions relating to the recognition of employee
organizations; and providing other matters properly relating
thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law sets forth various requirements and procedures for collective
bargaining between local government employers and local government employees.
(NRS 288.131-288.280) Existing law sets forth procedures by which the parties to a
negotiation involving a school district and an employee organization representing
teachers or educational support personnel, after having failed to reach a collective
bargaining agreement after at least four sessions of negotiations, may submit the
issues remaining in dispute to a binding arbitration process. (NRS 288.217)
Section 3 of this bill sets forth additional procedures by which the parties to a
negotiation involving a school district and an employee organization representing
teachers may submit issues remaining in dispute to a binding arbitration process.
Under section 3, the parties may, by mutual agreement, submit issues remaining in
dispute to the binding arbitration process set forth in section 3 if the collective
bargaining agreement between the school district and the employee organization
representing teachers: (1) is scheduled to expire within 75 days before the first day
of instruction of a school year and the parties have not agreed to a successor
agreement 75 days before the first day of instruction of the school year, in which
case the parties may submit the issues in dispute to an arbitrator any time on or
after the date that is 75 days before the first day of instruction of the school year
and on or before the date that is 30 days before the first day of instruction of the
school year; or (2) has expired, in which case the parties may submit the issues in
dispute to an arbitrator any time after the expiration of the agreement. Section 3
sets forth procedures for the selection of the arbitrator and procedures and
requirements for the arbitration process. Section 3 requires the arbitrator to render a
final decision, which is binding on the parties: (1) if the issues in dispute are
submitted to the binding arbitration process in accordance with the procedures for a
collective bargaining agreement which has expired, not later than 60 days after the
parties agreed to submit the issues in dispute to the binding arbitration process; or
(2) if the issues in dispute are submitted to the binding arbitration process in
accordance with the procedures for a collective bargaining agreement that is
scheduled to expire within 75 days before the first day of instruction of a school
year, not later than the first day of instruction of the school year. Section 12 of this
– 2 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
bill makes a conforming change to indicate that parties to a negotiation between a
school district and an employee organization representing teachers may utilize the
procedures set forth in section 3 under certain circumstances.
Section 4 of this bill provides that if a collective bargaining agreement between
a school district and an employee organization representing teachers has expired
and the terms of the agreement remain in effect under certain circumstances, the
school district or any agent thereof is prohibited from requesting, requiring or
urging a teacher to work more in any workday or workweek than the total amount
of time required by the expired agreement for each workday or workweek.
Existing law declares it to be the public policy of this State that strikes against
the State or a local government employer are illegal. (NRS 288.700) Existing law
requires a court that finds that such an illegal strike has occurred, or unless enjoined
will occur, to enjoin the commencement or continuance of the strike. (NRS
288.705) If a strike is commenced or continued in violation of an order enjoining
the strike, existing law authorizes a court to impose certain penalties against an
employee organization or labor organization guilty of such violation, any officer
thereof who is wholly or partly responsible of such violation or any employee of
the State or of a local government employer who participates in the strike. (NRS
288.710) Existing law also authorizes a State or local government employer to take
certain actions against an employee who participates in a strike, including,
dismissing, suspending or demoting the employee, canceling the contract of
employment for such an employee or withholding all or any part of the salary or
wages of the employee which would otherwise accrue. (NRS 288.715)
Sections 15 and 16 of this bill provide that the penalties that may be imposed
by a court and the actions that may be taken by a local government employer with
respect to a strike do not apply to a strike involving teachers or an employee
organization representing teachers. Instead, section 7 of this bill provides for the
imposition of penalties only on the employee organization and the officers of the
employee organization, and not an individual teacher, for an illegal strike.
Existing law defines “strike” to mean certain specified concerted conduct.
(NRS 288.074) Section 9 of this bill excludes from the definition of “strike” any of
the specified concerted conduct that is engaged in by teachers at one or more
schools in a school district unless the concerted conduct is engaged in on a district-
wide basis.
Existing law: (1) requires an employee organization that applies to a local
government employer for recognition to provide a pledge in writing not to strike
against the local government employer; and (2) authorizes a local government
employer to withdraw recognition from an employee organization that disavows
that pledge. (NRS 288.160) Section 11 of this bill excludes an employee
organization representing teachers from those provisions.
Sections 2 and 8 of this bill establish a definition for the term “teacher” for the
purposes of the provisions of existing law governing collective bargaining by
public employees.
Section 10 of this bill makes a conforming change to indicate the proper
placement of sections 3 and 4 in the Nevada Revised Statutes.
– 3 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 288 of NRS is hereby amended by adding
thereto the provisions set forth as sections 2 to 7, inclusive, of this
act.
Sec. 2. “Teacher” means an employee of a school district
who is licensed to teach in this State and who is represented by an
employee organization.
Sec. 3. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, if a
collective bargaining agreement between a school district and an
employee organization representing teachers is scheduled to
expire within 75 days before the first day of instruction of a school
year and the parties have not agreed to a successor agreement 75
days before the first day of instruction of the school year, the
parties may, at any time on or after the date that is 75 days before
the first day of instruction of the school year and on or before the
date that is 30 days before the first day of instruction of the school
year, mutually agree to submit the issues remaining in dispute to
an arbitrator to arbitrate the dispute in accordance with the
provisions of this section.
2. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, if a collective
bargaining agreement between a school district and an employee
organization representing teachers has expired and the parties
have not agreed to a successor agreement, the parties may, at any
time after the expiration of the agreement, mutually agree to
submit the issues remaining in dispute to an arbitrator to arbitrate
the dispute in accordance with the provisions of this section.
3. Not less than 180 days before the expiration of a collective
bargaining agreement between a school district and an employee
organization representing teachers or, for such a collective
bargaining agreement that is of the type described in subsection 1,
not less than 180 days before the first day of instruction of the
school year, the parties shall assemble a list of not more than five
potential arbitrators who agree to make themselves available to
conduct arbitration proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this section. The number of potential arbitrators on the list and
the selection of each potential arbitrator on the list must be
mutually agreed to by the parties. If the parties fail to assemble a
list of potential arbitrators pursuant to this subsection, the parties
may not utilize the procedures set forth in this section.
– 4 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
4. During any period specified in subsection 1 or 2, either
party to the collective bargaining agreement may submit to the
other party a request to agree to submit the issues remaining in
dispute to an arbitrator to arbitrate the dispute in accordance with
the provisions of this section. The other party shall, within 3
business days after receipt of the request, respond to the party and
either approve or deny the request.
5. If the request submitted pursuant to subsection 4 is
approved, the parties shall, within 2 days after the approval is
granted, select their arbitrator from the list assembled pursuant to
subsection 3. If there is more than one potential arbitrator on the
list, the parties shall alternately strike one name until the name of
only one arbitrator remains, who will be the arbitrator to arbitrate
the dispute. The employee organization shall strike the first name.
The arbitrator has the powers provided for fact finders in
NRS 288.210.
6. After the arbitrator is selected pursuant to subsection 5, the
arbitrator shall hold a hearing to receive information regarding
the dispute. The arbitrator shall, within 5 days after being selected,
establish a date and time to hold the hearing and provide notice of
the date and time to the parties. The date and time must be
established with due regard to the expedited nature of the
proceedings and the requirements for the issuance of a decision
pursuant to subsection 12.
7. The parties to the dispute shall each pay one-half of the
costs of the arbitration.
8. A determination of the financial ability of a school district
must be based on:
(a) All existing available revenues as established by the school
district, including, without limitation, any money appropriated by
the State to carry out increases in salaries or benefits for the
employees of the school district, and with the limitations set forth
in NRS 354.6241, with due regard for the obligation of the school
district to provide an education to the children residing within the
district.
(b) Consideration of funding for the current year being
negotiated. If the parties mutually agree to arbitrate a multi-year
contract, the arbitrator must consider the ability to pay over the
life of the contract being negotiated or arbitrated.
Once the arbitrator has determined in accordance with this
subsection that there is a current financial ability to grant
monetary benefits, the arbitrator shall consider, to the extent
– 5 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
appropriate, compensation of other governmental employees, both
in and out of this State.
9. At the recommendation of the arbitrator, the parties may,
before the submission of a final offer, enter into negotiations. If
the negotiations are begun, the arbitrator may adjourn the hearing
for a period of 7 days. If an agreement is reached, it must be
submitted to the arbitrator, who shall certify it as final and
binding.
10. If the parties do not enter negotiations or do not agree
within 7 days after the hearing held pursuant to subsection 6, each
of the parties shall submit a single written statement containing its
final offer for each of the unresolved issues.
11. The arbitrator shall render a decision on the basis of the
criteria set forth in NRS 288.200. The arbitrator shall accept one
of the written statements and shall report the decision to the
parties. The decision of the arbitrator is final and binding on the
parties. Any award of the arbitrator is retroactive to the expiration
date of the last contract between the parties.
12. The decision of the arbitrator must be rendered not later
than the earlier of 7 days after the final offers are submitted
pursuant to subsection 10 or:
(a) For a dispute submitted pursuant to subsection 1, the first
day of instruction of the school year.
(b) For a dispute submitted pursuant to subsection 2, 60 days
after approval of the request submitted pursuant to subsection 4 is
granted.
13. The decision of the arbitrator must include a statement:
(a) Giving the arbitrator’s reason for accepting the final offer
that is the basis of the arbitrator’s award; and
(b) Specifying the arbitrator’s estimate of the total cost of the
award.
14. Within 30 days after the receipt of the decision from the
arbitrator, the board of trustees of the school district shall hold a
public meeting in accordance with the provisions of chapter 241 of
NRS. The meeting must include a discussion of:
(a) The issues submitted pursuant to subsection 1 or 2, as
applicable;
(b) The statement of the arbitrator included in the decision of
the arbitrator pursuant to subsection 13; and
(c) The overall fiscal impact of the decision, which must not
include a discussion of the details of the decision.
The arbitrator must not be asked to discuss the decision during
the meeting.
– 6 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
15. The superintendent of the school district shall report to
the board of trustees the fiscal impact of the decision. The report
must include, without limitation, an analysis of the impact of the
decision on compensation and reimbursement, funding, benefits,
hours, working conditions
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on LegiScan.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on LegiScan
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.