Nevada
AB381
AB381 - Revises provisions related to animals. (BDR 50-793)
Source: LegiScan ·
6,822 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
-
83rd Session (2025)
Assembly Bill No. 381–Assemblymembers Hardy, Hibbetts,
Marzola, Miller; Dalia, González, Jauregui, La Rue Hatch,
Moore, Nadeem, Nguyen, Orentlicher, Roth and Yeager
Joint Sponsor: Senator Scheible
CHAPTER..........
AN ACT relating to animals; revising provisions governing the
seizure of animals under certain circumstances; revising
certain penalties and remedies for acts of animal cruelty;
revising certain provisions governing the ownership and care
of animals treated cruelly; revising provisions relating to
immunity from civil liability for certain actions taken to
protect or remove a pet from a motor vehicle under certain
circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating
thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law requires certain officers to: (1) take possession of an animal which
is being treated cruelly and provide the animal with shelter and care or, with the
permission of the owner, humanely destroy the animal; and (2) give to the owner a
notice containing certain information. (NRS 574.055) Section 3 of this bill also
authorizes an officer that takes possession of an animal to destroy the animal in a
humane manner if: (1) the officer obtains an order from a court; or (2) a licensed
veterinarian, veterinarian technician or euthanasia technician examines the animal
and recommends that the animal be humanely destroyed.
Upon proof that proper notice has been given, existing law authorizes a court of
competent jurisdiction to order the animal sold at auction, humanely destroyed or
continued in the care of the officer. (NRS 574.055) Section 3 removes the
authorization for a court to order the animal sold at auction.
Existing law provides that, with certain exceptions, the seizure and disposition
of an animal which an officer discovers is being treated cruelly does not apply to
any animal which is located on land being employed for an agricultural use. (NRS
574.055) Section 3 removes this exception.
Existing law provides that a person who engages in certain acts of torture or
cruelty to animals is guilty of a misdemeanor for a first offense, except if the
person: (1) willfully and maliciously engages in such an act, the person is guilty of
a category D felony; or (2) commits the act to threaten, intimidate or terrorize
another person, the person is guilty of a category C felony. (NRS 574.100) Section
4 of this bill provides instead that a willful and malicious violation where the act
causes the death of the animal and committing the act to threaten, intimidate or
terrorize another person are both a category B felony, punishable by imprisonment
in the state prison for a minimum term of 1 year and a maximum term of 6 years.
Existing law prohibits the owner, possessor or person in charge or custody of a
maimed, diseased, disabled or infirm animal from abandoning the animal, leaving
the animal to die in certain public places or allowing the animal to lie in certain
public places for more than 3 hours after the person receives notice that the animal
is left disabled. A violation of this prohibition is a misdemeanor. (NRS 574.110)
Existing law also prohibits a person from abandoning an animal in any other
circumstance, with certain exceptions for feral cats. A violation of this prohibition
is a misdemeanor that is subject to certain enhanced penalties under certain
– 2 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
circumstances. (NRS 574.100) Section 4 prohibits the abandonment of an animal in
all circumstances, with certain exceptions for feral cats. Section 15.5 of this bill
repeals the existing law relating to the abandonment of a maimed, diseased,
disabled or infirm animal. As a result of this change, the abandonment of an animal,
regardless of the health of the animal, is subject to the same penalties and penalty
enhancements.
Existing law provides that a person who engages in certain acts of torture of or
cruelty to a police animal is guilty of: (1) a category D felony if the police animal is
not totally disabled or killed; and (2) a category C felony if the police animal is
totally disabled or killed. (NRS 574.105) Section 5 of this bill increases these
penalties to a category B felony if the police animal is totally disabled or killed,
punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than
1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years.
Existing law sets forth the applicability of certain provisions relating to cruelty
to animals. (NRS 574.200) Section 6 of this bill provides that these provisions do
not prohibit providing humane relief to an animal to prevent the further suffering of
the animal when the animal is gravely injured.
Existing law requires that if a person is lawfully arrested for certain crimes
against animals and an animal owned or possessed by the person is impounded by
the county, city or other local government in connection with the arrest, the person
must be notified of his or her right to request a hearing within 5 days. If the person
does not request a hearing, or if the owner of the animal has not been identified
within 5 days after the arrest, the county, city or other local government which
impounded the animal is required to transfer ownership of the animal to an animal
rescue organization, animal shelter or another person who is able to provide
adequate care and shelter to the animal. (NRS 574.055, 574.203) Sections 3 and 7
of this bill require the owner to be notified of his or her right to request a hearing
within 7 calendar days after receiving the notice. Sections 3 and 7 also provide
that, if the arrested and detained person does not request a hearing, or the owner of
the animal has not been identified within 7 calendar days after the arrest, the animal
is forfeited to the county, city or other local government which took possession of
the animal, who must then dispose of the animal as the county, city or other local
government sees fit.
Existing law provides that the knowing, purposeful or reckless killing or
injuring of an animal may be an act that constitutes domestic violence. (NRS
33.018) Existing law authorizes a court, by a temporary order, to enjoin the adverse
party named in an application for an order for protection against domestic violence
from: (1) physically injuring, threatening to injure or taking possession of any
animal that is owned or kept by the applicant for the order or a minor child and any
animal that is owned or kept by the adverse party; and (2) physically injuring or
threatening to injure any animal that is owned or kept by the adverse party. Existing
law further authorizes the court, by extended order, to specify arrangements for the
possession and care of any animal owned or kept by the adverse party, applicant or
minor child. (NRS 33.030) Section 8 of this bill authorizes the court, by temporary
order, to enjoin the adverse party from taking possession of an animal that is owned
or kept by the adverse party.
Existing law requires, if a child is adjudicated delinquent for an unlawful act
that involves cruelty to or torture of an animal, the juvenile court to order the child
to participate in counseling or other psychological treatment. (NRS 62E.680)
Sections 1.9 and 9 of this bill require the juvenile court to order such a child to also
undergo a psychological evaluation.
Existing law provides that if a person is convicted for an unlawful act involving
animal cruelty, a court may order, as a condition of probation, the person to submit
– 3 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
to a psychiatric evaluation and participate in counseling or therapy. (NRS
176A.416) Sections 1.9 and 11 of this bill authorize a court to also order such a
person to participate in a rehabilitative or educational program.
Section 2 of this bill applies certain definitions in existing law relating to
animal cruelty to the provisions of section 1.9.
Existing law prohibits a person from leaving a pet in a motor vehicle under
certain circumstances. (NRS 202.487) Existing law authorizes a peace officer, an
animal control officer, certain governmental officers and certain other persons to
use any reasonable means necessary to protect a pet left unattended in a motor
vehicle and to remove the pet from the motor vehicle without incurring civil
liability, under certain circumstances. (NRS 202.487) Section 14 of this bill
provides that a person who is immune from civil liability for taking such actions is
also immune from criminal liability. Section 14 also authorizes any other person to
whom existing law does not grant immunity from civil liability to use any
reasonable means necessary to protect a pet left unattended and to remove the pet
from the motor vehicle without incurring civil or criminal liability if the person: (1)
determines that the motor vehicle is locked or there is no other reasonable way to
protect the pet or remove the pet from the vehicle; (2) reports the violation to a law
enforcement agency or certain other governmental entities; (3) remains with the pet
until informed that his or her presence is no longer needed by such law enforcement
agency or other governmental entity; and (4) cooperates with certain persons who
respond to a request for assistance.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Sections 1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8. (Deleted by amendment.)
Sec. 1.9. Chapter 574 of NRS is hereby amended by adding
thereto a new section to read as follows:
In addition to any other penalty or remedy imposed pursuant to
NRS 574.050 to 574.200, inclusive:
1. A court may, pursuant to NRS 176A.416, order a
defendant convicted of a violation of a provision of NRS 574.050
to 574.200, inclusive, as a condition of probation, to:
(a) Submit to a psychiatric evaluation;
(b) Participate in counseling or therapy; or
(c) Participate in a rehabilitative or educational program.
2. If a defendant convicted of a violation of a provision of
NRS 574.050 to 574.200, inclusive, is a child adjudicated
delinquent for an act that involves cruelty to or torture of an
animal, the juvenile court shall, pursuant to NRS 62E.680, order
the child to undergo a psychological evaluation and participate in
counseling or other psychological treatment.
– 4 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
Sec. 2. NRS 574.050 is hereby amended to read as follows:
574.050 As used in NRS 574.050 to 574.200, inclusive [:] ,
and section 1.9 of this act:
1. “Animal” does not include the human race, but includes
every other living creature.
2. “First responder” means a person who has successfully
completed the national standard course for first responders.
3. “Police animal” means an animal which is owned or used by
a state or local governmental agency and which is used by a peace
officer in performing his or her duties as a peace officer.
4. “Torture” or “cruelty” includes every act, omission or
neglect, whereby unjustifiable physical pain, suffering or death is
caused or permitted.
Sec. 3. NRS 574.055 is hereby amended to read as follows:
574.055 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 574.201 to
574.204, inclusive:
1. Any peace officer or animal control officer shall, upon
discovering any animal which is being treated cruelly, take
possession of [it] the animal and [provide it] :
(a) Provide the animal with shelter and care ; or [, upon
obtaining]
(b) Destroy the animal in a humane manner if:
(1) The officer obtains written permission from the owner of
the animal [, may destroy it in a humane manner.] ;
(2) The officer obtains an order from a court; or
(3) A veterinarian, veterinarian technician or euthanasia
technician licensed pursuant to chapter 638 of NRS examines the
animal and recommends that the animal be humanely destroyed.
2. If an officer takes possession of an animal, the officer shall
give to the owner, if the owner can be found, a notice containing a
written statement of the reasons for the taking, the location where
the animal will be cared for and sheltered, the fact that there is a
limited lien on the animal for the cost of shelter and care and , if
applicable, notice of the right of the owner to request a hearing
pursuant to NRS 574.203 [within] not later than [5] 7 calendar
days after receipt of the notice. If the owner is not present at the
taking and the officer cannot find the owner after a reasonable
search, the officer shall post the notice on the property from which
the officer takes the animal. If the identity and address of the owner
are later determined, the notice must be mailed to the owner
immediately after the determination is made.
3. An officer who takes possession of an animal pursuant to
this section has a lien on the animal for the reasonable cost of care
– 5 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
and shelter furnished to the animal and, if applicable, for its humane
destruction. The lien does not extend to the cost of care and shelter
for more than 2 weeks.
4. [Upon proof that] If the owner of an animal has been
notified in accordance with the provisions of subsection 2 and the
owner does not request a hearing pursuant to NRS 574.203 or [, if]
the owner has not been found [or identified, that] not later than 7
calendar days after the required notice has been posted on the
property where the animal was found, [a court of competent
jurisdiction may, after providing an opportunity for a hearing, order]
the animal [sold at auction, humanely destroyed or continued in the
care of] is forfeited to the [officer] county, city or other local
government which took possession of the animal for [such]
disposition as the [officer] county, city or other local government
sees fit [.
5. An officer who seizes an] , which may include, without
limitation, the humane destruction of the animal or transferring
ownership of the animal [pursuant] to [this section] an animal
rescue organization, animal shelter or another person who is able
to provide adequate care and shelter to the animal.
5. The State, political subdivisions of the State, any public
officers or employees of the State or political subdivisions of the
State, and any veterinarian, veterinarian technician or euthanasia
technician who recommends the humane destruction of an animal
pursuant to subsection 1 are not liable for any action arising out of
the taking or humane destruction of the animal.
[6. The provisions of this section do not apply to any animal
which is located on land being employed for an agricultural use as
defined in NRS 361A.030 unless the owner of the animal or the
per
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on LegiScan.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on LegiScan
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.