Nevada
AB275
AB275 - Revises provisions related to criminal procedure. (BDR 14-548)
Source: LegiScan ·
1,588 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
A.B. 275
-
*AB275*
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 275–ASSEMBLYMEMBERS O’NEILL, DELONG,
DICKMAN; EDGEWORTH, GRAY, GURR, HARDY, HIBBETTS,
KASAMA, KOENIG AND YUREK
FEBRUARY 24, 2025
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises provisions related to criminal procedure.
(BDR 14-548)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State: No.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
AN ACT relating to criminal procedure; providing that the
interception, listening or recording of a wire, electronic or
oral communication by a peace officer or certain other
persons is not unlawful in certain circumstances; and
providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law provides that the interception, listening or recording of a wire,
1
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer or certain other persons is not
2
unlawful if the peace officer or person is intercepting the communication of a
3
person who has: (1) barricaded himself or herself, resulting in an imminent risk of
4
harm to the life of another person; (2) created a hostage situation; or (3) threatened
5
the imminent illegal use of an explosive. (NRS 179.463, 200.620) Sections 3 and 6
6
of this bill similarly provide that the interception, listening or recording of a wire,
7
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer or certain persons acting under
8
the direction or request of a peace officer is not unlawful if the peace officer or
9
person is intercepting the communication for the sole purpose of investigating a
10
sexual offense against a child. Section 2 of this bill defines the term “sexual offense
11
against a child” for purposes of section 3 and certain other provisions of existing
12
law relating to the interception of communications. Section 4 of this bill makes
13
certain definitions prescribed by existing law applicable to sections 2 and 3.
14
Section 5 of this bill makes a conforming change by eliminating certain language
15
made redundant by section 2.
16
– 2 –
-
*AB275*
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 179 of NRS is hereby amended by adding
1
thereto the provisions set forth as sections 2 and 3 of this act.
2
Sec. 2. “Sexual offense against a child” includes any act
3
upon a child constituting:
4
1. Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180;
5
2. Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230;
6
3. Sado-masochistic abuse pursuant to NRS 201.262;
7
4. Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366;
8
5. Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368;
9
6. Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210; or
10
7. Luring a child or a person with mental illness pursuant to
11
NRS 201.560, if punished as a felony.
12
Sec. 3. 1. The interception, listening or recording of a wire,
13
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer, or a person
14
acting under the direction or request of a peace officer, is not
15
unlawful if the peace officer or person is intercepting the
16
communication for the sole purpose of investigating a sexual
17
offense against a child.
18
2. As used in this section, “person” means:
19
(a) A child, with the consent of the parent or legal guardian of
20
the child; or
21
(b) The parent or legal guardian of a child.
22
Sec. 4. NRS 179.410 is hereby amended to read as follows:
23
179.410 As used in NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, and
24
sections 2 and 3 of this act, except where the context otherwise
25
requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 179.415 to 179.455,
26
inclusive, and section 2 of this act have the meanings ascribed to
27
them in those sections.
28
Sec. 5. NRS 179.460 is hereby amended to read as follows:
29
179.460 1. The Attorney General or the district attorney of
30
any county may apply to a Supreme Court justice or to a district
31
judge in the county where the interception is to take place for an
32
order authorizing the interception of wire, electronic or oral
33
communications, and the judge may, in accordance with NRS
34
179.470 to 179.515, inclusive, grant an order authorizing the
35
interception of wire, electronic or oral communications by
36
investigative or law enforcement officers having responsibility for
37
the investigation of the offense as to which the application is made,
38
when the interception may provide evidence of the commission of
39
murder, kidnapping, robbery, extortion, bribery, escape of an
40
offender in the custody of the Department of Corrections,
41
destruction of public property by explosives, a sexual offense
42
– 3 –
-
*AB275*
against a child, sex trafficking, a violation of NRS 200.463, 200.464
1
or 200.465, trafficking in persons in violation of NRS 200.467 or
2
200.468, a violation of NRS 201.553, the commission of any
3
offense which is made a felony by the provisions of chapter 453 or
4
454 of NRS or a violation of NRS 463.160 or 465.086.
5
2. A provider of electronic communication service or a public
6
utility, an officer, employee or agent thereof or another person
7
associated with the provider of electronic communication service or
8
public utility who, pursuant to an order issued pursuant to
9
subsection 1, provides information or otherwise assists an
10
investigative or law enforcement officer in the interception of a
11
wire, electronic or oral communication is immune from any liability
12
relating to any interception made pursuant to the order.
13
[3. As used in this section, “sexual offense against a child”
14
includes any act upon a child constituting:
15
(a) Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180;
16
(b) Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230;
17
(c) Sado-masochistic abuse pursuant to NRS 201.262;
18
(d) Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366;
19
(e) Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368;
20
(f) Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210; or
21
(g) Luring a child or a person with mental illness pursuant to
22
NRS 201.560, if punished as a felony.]
23
Sec. 6. NRS 200.620 is hereby amended to read as follows:
24
200.620 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5 and
25
NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, 209.419 and 704.195, it is
26
unlawful for any person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire
27
communication unless:
28
(a) The interception or attempted interception is made with the
29
prior consent of one of the parties to the communication; and
30
(b) An emergency situation exists and it is impractical to obtain
31
a court order as required by NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive,
32
before the interception, in which event the interception is subject to
33
the requirements of subsection 3. If the application for ratification is
34
denied, any use or disclosure of the information so intercepted is
35
unlawful, and the person who made the interception shall notify the
36
sender and the receiver of the communication that:
37
(1) The communication was intercepted; and
38
(2) Upon application to the court, ratification of the
39
interception was denied.
40
2. This section does not apply to any person, or to the officers,
41
employees or agents of any person, engaged in the business of
42
providing service and facilities for wire communication where the
43
interception or attempted interception is to construct, maintain,
44
conduct or operate the service or facilities of that person.
45
– 4 –
-
*AB275*
3. Any person who has made an interception in an emergency
1
situation as provided in paragraph (b) of subsection 1 shall, within
2
72 hours of the interception, make a written application to a justice
3
of the Supreme Court or district judge for ratification of the
4
interception. The interception must not be ratified unless the
5
applicant shows that:
6
(a) An emergency situation existed and it was impractical to
7
obtain a court order before the interception; and
8
(b) Except for the absence of a court order, the interception met
9
the requirements of NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive.
10
4. NRS 200.610 to 200.690, inclusive, do not prohibit the
11
recording, and NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, do not prohibit
12
the reception in evidence, of conversations on wire communications
13
installed in the office of an official law enforcement or fire-fighting
14
agency, or a public utility, if the equipment used for the recording is
15
installed in a facility for wire communications or on a telephone
16
with a number listed in a directory, on which emergency calls or
17
requests by a person for response by the law enforcement or fire-
18
fighting agency or public utility are likely to be received. In
19
addition, those sections do not prohibit the recording or reception in
20
evidence of conversations initiated by the law enforcement or fire-
21
fighting agency or public utility from such a facility or telephone in
22
connection with responding to the original call or request, if the
23
agency or public utility informs the other party that the conversation
24
is being recorded.
25
5. The interception or attempted interception of a wire
26
communication is not unlawful under the circumstances set forth in
27
subsection 1 of NRS 179.463 [.] or subsection 1 of section 3 of this
28
act.
29
H
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on LegiScan
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.