Nevada
AB239
AB239 - Revises provisions relating to business entities. (BDR 7-669)
Source: LegiScan ·
17,942 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
-
83rd Session (2025)
Assembly Bill No. 239–Assemblymember Dalia
CHAPTER..........
AN ACT relating to business entities; revising provisions relating to
notice or other communications by business entities; making
a conforming change relating to fiduciary duties owed by
directors and officers of a corporation; revising provisions
governing voting relating to the approval of a reverse stock
split of a corporation; removing certain provisions governing
the issuance of shares of a corporation; making changes to
certain approvals by a board of directors; clarifying
provisions relating to voting agreements by stockholders;
revising provisions governing the amendment of articles of
incorporation after issuance of stock; revising certain terms
relating to business entities; revising provisions relating to
the last known address of members and managers of a
limited-liability company and the dissolution of a limited-
liability company; establishing a process by which a
corporation may reorganize through the formation of a
holding corporation; revising provisions relating to the
approval of a plan of merger, conversion or exchange of a
domestic corporation and the conversion of a domestic entity
into a foreign entity; revising provisions governing the right
of a stockholder to dissent from certain corporate actions;
making various other changes relating to business entities;
and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law sets forth various provisions governing business entities, including
private corporations and limited-liability companies. (Chapters 78 and 86 of NRS)
This bill makes various changes to business entities.
Section 1 of this bill clarifies that the inclusion of certain materials provided
with a notice or other communication by a business entity are deemed to be part of
the notice or communication. Section 1.5 of this bill authorizes the articles of
incorporation of a corporation to require certain internal actions to be tried before a
judge and not a jury. Section 2 of this bill makes a conforming change relating to
the fiduciary duties of directors and officers of a private corporation for consistency
within existing law.
Sections 3 and 4 of this bill require that votes relating to the approval of a
reverse stock split be approved by the vote of the relevant stockholders of such a
class or series of stock. Sections 5 and 9 of this bill remove the phrase “share
dividend” from provisions governing the issuance of shares of a private
corporation. Section 5.5 of this bill sets forth provisions relating to the fiduciary
duties of certain stockholders of a corporation, limits the individual liability of a
stockholder of a corporation under certain circumstances and defines certain terms
for such purposes.
– 2 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
Section 6 of this bill authorizes a board of directors of a private corporation to
take certain actions in final form or such preliminary form as the directors deem
appropriate in their business judgment.
Section 7 of this bill: (1) provides that voting agreements entered into by
stockholders may include a private corporation; and (2) makes conforming changes
authorizing the reference in such an agreement to facts or events outside of the
agreement as provided in existing law. Section 8 of this bill: (1) provides that a
proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation of a private corporation after
the issuance of stock that designates one or more new series of an existing class
does not adversely alter or change the preferences or rights of the existing series;
and (2) authorizes a publicly traded corporation to amend its articles of
incorporation to increase or decrease the shares it is authorized to issue through a
stockholder vote.
Section 11 of this bill clarifies the notice required if the approval of a
dissolution of a corporation was obtained by written consent and replaces the
phrase “certificate of dissolution” with “articles of dissolution” for purposes of
provisions relating to the dissolution of a corporation. Sections 10-12, 15 and 18-
21 of this bill make conforming changes to reference “articles of dissolution” for
purposes of provisions relating to the dissolution of a corporation or a limited-
liability company, as applicable. Section 13 of this bill makes a conforming change
to replace “certificate of dissolution” with “record of dissolution.” Section 16 of
this bill provides an effective date and time for filing the articles of dissolution of a
limited-liability company.
Sections 14 and 17 of this bill provide for either the residence or business
address of members and managers of a limited-liability company to be listed for
certain records.
Section 22 of this bill establishes a new process by which a corporation may:
(1) reorganize through the formation of a holding corporation; and (2) issue
stockholders shares in the new holding corporation in exchange for their previous
shares. Section 23 of this bill: (1) revises the steps required for a board of directors
to approve a plan of merger, conversion or exchange; and (2) removes provisions of
existing law which allowed for the board to cancel a proposed meeting to consider
or remove a plan of merger, conversion or exchange. Section 24 of this bill makes a
conforming change relating to voting for purposes of the new process of
reorganization into a holding corporation.
Section 25 of this bill makes a technical change relating to one domestic entity
converting into one foreign entity.
Section 26 of this bill provides that the right to dissent is the exclusive remedy
for stockholders who have the ability to dissent from a particular corporate action.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. NRS 75.150 is hereby amended to read as follows:
75.150 1. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute:
(a) Any notice or other communication described in this title
may be given or sent by any method of delivery [;] and each
agreement, instrument, certificate or other document enclosed
– 3 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
with, or annexed or appended to, such notice or other
communication shall be deemed part of the notice or
communication solely for purposes of determining whether notice
was duly given under this title and the organic rules of the entity
giving or sending the notice or other communication; and
(b) An electronic transmission must be in accordance with this
section.
2. A notice or other communication given or sent pursuant to
the organic law or organic rules of an entity may be delivered by
electronic transmission if:
(a) Consented to by the recipient or authorized by subsection 9;
and
(b) The electronic transmission contains or is accompanied by
information from which the recipient can determine the date of the
transmission.
3. Any consent under subsection 2 may be revoked by the
person who consented by written or electronic notice to the person
to whom the consent was delivered. Any such consent is deemed
revoked if:
(a) The person is unable to receive two consecutive electronic
transmissions given by the entity or organization in accordance with
such consent; and
(b) Such inability becomes known to the secretary of the entity
sending the electronic transmissions or to the transfer agent or other
person responsible for the giving of notice or other communications.
The inadvertent failure to treat any such inability as a revocation
does not invalidate any meeting or other action.
4. Unless otherwise agreed between sender and recipient, an
electronic transmission is received when:
(a) It enters an information processing system that the recipient
has designated or uses for the purpose of receiving electronic
transmissions or information of the type sent; and
(b) It is in a form ordinarily capable of being processed by that
system.
5. Receipt of an electronic acknowledgment from an
information processing system described in paragraph (a) of
subsection 4 establishes that an electronic transmission was received
but, by itself, does not establish that the content sent corresponds to
the content received.
6. An electronic transmission is received under this section
even if no natural person is aware of its receipt.
– 4 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
7. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, any notice
or other communication, if in a comprehensible form or manner, is
effective at the earliest of the following:
(a) If in a physical form, when it is left at:
(1) The address of a stockholder, member, partner or other
owner of an entity, whichever is applicable, as it appears upon the
records of the entity;
(2) The residence or usual place of business of a director,
manager or general partner, whichever is applicable;
(3) The entity’s principal place of business; or
(4) If to a recipient other than a stockholder, director,
member, partner or other owner of an entity or an entity, such
person’s residence or usual place of business;
(b) If mailed by United States mail postage prepaid and
correctly addressed to a stockholder, member, partner or other
owner of an entity, upon deposit in the United States mail;
(c) If mailed by United States mail postage prepaid and correctly
addressed to a recipient other than a stockholder, member, partner or
other owner of an entity, the earliest of:
(1) If sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, the date shown on the return receipt signed by or on
behalf of the addressee; or
(2) Five days after it is deposited in the United States mail;
(d) If an electronic transmission, when it is received as provided
in subsection 4; and
(e) If oral, when communicated.
In the absence of fraud, an affidavit of the secretary of the entity
or the transfer agent or any other agent of the entity that the notice
has been given by a form of electronic transmission is prima facie
evidence of the facts stated in the affidavit.
8. A notice or other communication may be in the form of an
electronic transmission that cannot be directly reproduced in paper
form by the recipient through an automated process used in
conventional commercial practice only if:
(a) The electronic transmission is otherwise retrievable in
perceivable form; and
(b) The sender and the recipient have consented in writing to the
use of such form of electronic transmission.
9. If any provision of this title prescribes requirements for
notices or other communication in particular circumstances, those
requirements govern. If the organic rules of an entity prescribe
requirements for notices or other communications, not inconsistent
with this section or other provisions of this title, those requirements
– 5 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
govern. The organic rules of an entity may authorize, require or
prohibit delivery of notices of meetings of directors, managers,
members, partners or other owners of the entity by electronic
transmission.
10. In the event that any provisions of this section are deemed
to modify, limit or supersede the federal Electronic Signatures in
Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 7001 et seq., the
provisions of this section shall be deemed to control to the
maximum extent permitted by section 102(a)(2) of that Act, 15
U.S.C. § 7002(a)(2).
11. As used in this section:
(a) “Entity” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 77.060.
(b) “Organic law” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 77.170.
(c) “Organic rules” has the meaning ascribed to it in
NRS 77.180.
Sec. 1.5. NRS 78.046 is hereby amended to read as follows:
78.046 1. The articles of incorporation or bylaws of a
corporation may require, to the extent not inconsistent with any
applicable jurisdictional requirements and the laws of the United
States, that any, all or certain:
(a) Concurrent jurisdiction actions must be brought solely or
exclusively in the court or courts specified in the requirement; and
(b) Internal actions must be brought solely or exclusively in the
court or courts specified in the requirement, which must include at
least one court in this State.
2. Unless otherwise expressly set forth in the articles of
incorporation or bylaws, any requirement described in subsection 1
must not be interpreted as prohibiting any corporation from
consenting, or requiring any corporation to consent, to any
alternative forum in any instance.
3. The provisions of this section do not create or authorize any
cause of action against a corporation , [or] its directors or officers [.]
or any controlling stockholder.
4. The articles of incorporation of a corporation may require,
to the extent not inconsistent with any applicable laws of the
United States, that any, all or certain internal actions to be tried in
any court of this State must be tried before the presiding judge as
the trier of fact and not before a jury. Upon and during its
effectiveness, any such requirement must conclusively operate as a
waiver of the right to trial by jury by each party to any internal
action to which such requirement applies. Nothing in this section
or any such requirement shall be construed as to limit or
– 6 –
-
83rd Session (2025)
otherwise affect any right to a jury trial in any action, suit or
proceeding that is not an internal action.
5. As used in this section:
(a) “Concurrent jurisdiction action” means any action, suit or
proceeding against the corporation or any of its directors or officers,
that:
(1) Asserts a cause of action under the laws of the United
States;
(2) Could be properly commenced in either a federal forum
or a forum of this State or any other state; and
(3) Is brought by or in the name or on behalf of:
(I) The corporation;
(II) Any stockholder of the corporation; or
(III) Any subscriber for, or purchaser or offeree of, any
shares or other securities of the corporation.
(b) “Controlling stockholder” has the meaning ascribed to it in
NRS 78.240.
(c) “Court” means any court of:
(1) This State, including, without limitation, those courts in
any county having a business court, as that term is defined in
NRS 13.050;
(2) A state other than this State; or
(3) The United States.
[(c)] (d) “Internal action” means any action, suit or proceeding:
(1) Brought in the name or right of the corporation or on its
behalf, including, without limitation, any action subject to
NRS 41.520;
(2) For or based upon any breach of any fid
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on LegiScan.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on LegiScan
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.