Federal
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that dark money undermines the integrity of the judicial system and damages the perception that all people receive equal justice under law.
Source: Congress.gov ·
882 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
III
116TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
S. RES. 759
Expressing the sense of the Senate that dark money undermines the integrity
of the judicial system and damages the perception that all people receive
equal justice under law.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER 24 (legislative day, OCTOBER 19), 2020
Mr. WHITEHOUSE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that dark money under-
mines the integrity of the judicial system and damages
the perception that all people receive equal justice under
law.
Whereas dark money organizations, funded by anonymous do-
nors, have played an outsized role in the selection of
judges and justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘Supreme
Court’’) under President Trump and spent millions of
anonymous dollars on advertising campaigns supporting
those selections;
Whereas the people of the United States have no idea who
is funding these campaigns and what business the
funders might have before the courts;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:19 Oct 24, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SR759.IS
SR759
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2
•SRES 759 IS
Whereas, under President Trump, the Federalist Society for
Law and Public Policy Studies (referred to in this pre-
amble as the ‘‘Federalist Society’’) has played a central
role in the selection of President Trump’s judicial nomi-
nees, including his 3 nominees to the Supreme Court, for
example—
(1) in 2016, then-candidate Trump said that all of
his judicial selections would ‘‘be hand-picked by the Fed-
eralist Society’’;
(2) in 2017, then-White House Counsel Don
McGahn boasted that the judicial selection process had
been ‘‘in-sourced’’ to the Federalist Society;
(3) Leonard Leo, the Co-Chairman of the Federalist
Society, twice took a leave of absence from the Federalist
Society to work in the White House and advise President
Trump on his Supreme Court nominations;
(4) approximately 86 percent of President Trump’s
Supreme Court and appellate court nominees have been
members of the Federalist Society; and
(5) Judge Amy Coney Barret has spoken at 26 Fed-
eralist Society events since 2014 and, at the time of his
confirmation in 2018, Justice Brett Kavanaugh had spo-
ken at over 50 Federalist Society events;
Whereas the Washington Post reported that Leonard Leo has
helped raise $250,000,000 from mostly anonymous do-
nors to promote conservative legal causes and judges;
Whereas groups engaged in these activities do not disclose
their funders, meaning the people of the United States
have no idea who is behind this sophisticated operation
to influence the selection of judges and justices;
Whereas dark money groups like the Judicial Crisis Network
(referred to in the preamble as ‘‘JCN’’) have helped
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:19 Oct 24, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SR759.IS
SR759
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3
•SRES 759 IS
shape the composition of the Supreme Court by spending
tens of millions of anonymous dollars on advertising cam-
paigns opposing or supporting Supreme Court nominees,
specifically—
(1) JCN spent $7,000,000 to block President
Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to be an
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 2016;
(2) JCN pledged to spend $10,000,000 to support
President Trump’s nomination of then-Judge Neil
Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
in 2017;
(3) JCN also spent $10,000,000 to support Presi-
dent
Trump’s
nomination
of
then-Judge
Brett
Kavanaugh to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme
Court in 2018; and
(4) JCN has pledged to spend $10,000,000 to sup-
port President Trump’s nomination of Judge Amy Coney
Barrett to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court;
Whereas JCN is a dark money organization and does not dis-
close its funders to the people of the United States;
Whereas JCN has received multiple massive contributions
from the anonymous donors, specifically—
(1) a $15,881,000 anonymous contribution in tax
year 2018;
(2) a $17,100,000 anonymous contribution in tax
year 2017;
(3) a $21,464,995 anonymous contribution in tax
year 2016; and
(4) a $17,920,000 anonymous contribution in tax
year 2015; and
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:19 Oct 24, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SR759.IS
SR759
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
4
•SRES 759 IS
Whereas the American people have no idea who made these
massive contributions and what business the contributors
might have before the courts: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—
1
(1) fair and impartial courts are a bedrock of
2
American democracy and crucial to maintaining the
3
faith of the people of the United States in the justice
4
system;
5
(2) this massive dark money operation to influ-
6
ence the selection and confirmation of judges and
7
justices creates significant conflict of interest con-
8
cerns for the judiciary and undermines the integrity
9
of the courts and the justice system; and
10
(3) the people of the United States deserve to
11
know who is behind this massive dark money cam-
12
paign to capture the courts.
13
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:19 Oct 24, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\SR759.IS
SR759
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.