Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

IV 116TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. RES. 1063 Raising a question of the privileges of the House. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JULY 23, 2020 Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. CRAWFORD) submitted the following resolu- tion; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration RESOLUTION Raising a question of the privileges of the House. Whereas, on July 22, 2020, H.R. 7573 was brought to the House floor for a vote, with the purpose of eliminating four specific statues or busts from the United States Capitol along with all others that include individuals who ‘‘served as an officer or voluntarily with the Confederate States of America or of the military forces or government of a State while the State was in rebellion against the United States’’ yet failed to address the most ever- present historical stigma in the United States Capitol; that is the source that so fervently supported, condoned and fought for slavery was left untouched, without whom, the evil of slavery could never have continued as it did, to such extreme that it is necessary to address it here in order for the U.S. House of Representatives to avoid deg- VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:18 Jul 24, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1063.IH HR1063 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS 2 •HRES 1063 IH radation of historical fact and blatant hypocrisy for gen- erations to come; Whereas the Democratic Party Platform of 1840, 1844, 1848, 1852, and 1856 states ‘‘That Congress has no power under the Constitution, to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs, not prohibited by the Constitution; that all efforts of the abolitionists, or oth- ers, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery . . . are calculated to lead to the most alarm- ing and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.’’; Whereas the Democratic Party Platform of 1856 further de- clares that ‘‘new states’’ to the Union should be admitted ‘‘with or without domestic slavery, as [the state] may elect.’’; Whereas the Democratic Party Platform of 1856 also re- solves that ‘‘we recognize the right of the people of all the Territories . . . to form a Constitution, with or with- out domestic slavery.’’; Whereas the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 penalized officials who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave and made them liable for a fine of $1,000 (about $28,000 in present-day value); law-enforcement officials everywhere were required to arrest people suspected of being a run- away slave on as little as a claimant’s sworn testimony of ownership; the Democratic Party Platform of 1860 di- rectly, in seeking to uphold the Fugitive Slave Act, states VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:18 Jul 24, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1063.IH HR1063 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS 3 •HRES 1063 IH that ‘‘the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law are hos- tile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revo- lutionary in their effect.’’; Whereas the 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94 percent Republican sup- port and 0 percent Democrat support in Congress; the 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100 pecent Republican support and 0 percent Democrat support in Congress; Whereas Democrats systematically suppressed African-Ameri- cans’ right to vote, and by specific example in the 1902 Constitution of the State of Virginia, actually disenfran- chised about 90 percent of the Black men who still voted at the beginning of the twentieth century and nearly half of the White men, thereby suppressing Republican voters; the number of eligible African-American voters were thereby forcibly reduced from about 147,000 in 1901 to about 10,000 by 1905; that measure was supported al- most exclusively by Virginia Democrats; Whereas Virginia’s 1902 Constitution was engineered by Car- ter Glass, future Democratic Party U.S. Representative, Senator, and even Secretary of the Treasury under Dem- ocrat President Woodrow Wilson, who proclaimed the goal of the constitutional convention as follows: This Democrat exclaimed ‘‘Discrimination! Why, that is pre- cisely what we propose. That, exactly, is what this Con- vention was elected for—to discriminate to the very ex- tremity of permissible action under the limits of the Fed- eral Constitution, with a view to the elimination of every [African-American] Negro voter who can be gotten rid of legally.’’; VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:18 Jul 24, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1063.IH HR1063 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS 4 •HRES 1063 IH Whereas, in 1912, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson’s administration began a racial segregation policy for U.S. government employees and, by 1914, the Wilson adminis- tration’s Civil Service instituted the requirement that a photograph be submitted with each employment applica- tion; Whereas the 1924 Democratic National Convention convened in New York City at Madison Square Garden; the con- vention is commonly known as the ‘‘Klan-Bake’’ due to the overwhelming influence of the Ku Klux Klan in the Democratic Party; Whereas, in 1964, the Democratic Party led a 75-calendar- day filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act; Whereas leading the Democrats in their opposition to civil rights for African Americans was a fellow member of the Democratic Party, Senator Robert Byrd from West Vir- ginia—a known recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan; Whereas Democrats enacted and enforced Jim Crow laws and civil codes that forced segregation and restricted free- doms of Black Americans in the United States; and Whereas, on June 18, 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or- dered the removal from the Capitol portraits of four pre- vious Speakers of the House who served in the Confed- eracy saying that the portraits, ‘‘set back our Nation’s work to confront and combat bigotry’’; the men depicted in the portraits were Democrat Robert M.T. Hunter, Democrat Howell Cobb, Democrat James L. Orr and Democrat Charles F. Crisp: Now, therefore, be it VerDate Sep 11 2014 22:59 Sep 11, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1063.IH HR1063 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS 5 •HRES 1063 IH Resolved, 1 (1) That the Speaker of the House of Rep- 2 resentatives shall remove any item that names, sym- 3 bolizes or mentions any political organization or 4 party that has ever held a public position that sup- 5 ported slavery or the Confederacy, from any area 6 within the House wing of the Capitol or any House 7 office building, and shall donate any such item or 8 symbol to the Library of Congress; and 9 (2) that any political organization or party that 10 has ever held a public position that supported slav- 11 ery or the Confederacy shall either change its name 12 or be barred from participation in the House of Rep- 13 resentatives. 14 Æ VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:18 Jul 24, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\HR1063.IH HR1063 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS