Federal
Measuring Real Income Growth Act of 2019
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,260 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 3102
To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce
to provide estimates relating to the distribution of aggregate economic
growth across specific percentile groups of income.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
DECEMBER 18, 2019
Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. UDALL, Mr. PETERS, Ms.
SMITH, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. VAN HOLLEN,
Mr. DURBIN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, Mr.
WYDEN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BENNET, Mr.
REED, Mr. WARNER, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. MARKEY) intro-
duced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Com-
mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
A BILL
To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Depart-
ment of Commerce to provide estimates relating to the
distribution of aggregate economic growth across specific
percentile groups of income.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Measuring Real In-
4
come Growth Act of 2019’’.
5
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•S 3102 IS
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
1
Congress finds the following:
2
(1) Economic inequality in the United States
3
has increased dramatically during the 4 decades pre-
4
ceding the date of enactment of this Act, with fewer
5
households taking home a larger share of the na-
6
tional income.
7
(2) While growth was once distributed relatively
8
evenly across all individuals in the United States, re-
9
search shows that economic gains are increasingly
10
enjoyed by the most affluent. By contrast, the ma-
11
jority of individuals in the United States have seen
12
income and wage growth significantly below what is
13
suggested by national measures of output and in-
14
come.
15
(3) The Bureau of Economic Analysis of the
16
Department of Commerce (referred to in this section
17
as ‘‘BEA’’) reports annual and quarterly estimates
18
of gross domestic product (referred to in this section
19
as ‘‘GDP’’) in the United States. These estimates
20
are important measures of the overall size and
21
health of the economy of the United States but do
22
not describe how economic gains are distributed
23
across the population of the United States.
24
(4) In a country of 325,000,000 individuals,
25
top-line GDP numbers do not capture the full range
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•S 3102 IS
of household economic experiences and may be mis-
1
leading. For example, the real GDP grew more than
2
3 percent annually between 2003 and 2005, but the
3
average income for 1⁄2 of all individuals in the
4
United States fell during that period.
5
(5) Disaggregating economic growth by income
6
groups will provide a more complete picture of how
7
families in the United States are faring across all
8
rungs of the economic ladder and whether economic
9
growth is benefitting all individuals in the United
10
States.
11
(6) Recent academic estimates of distributional
12
growth show how much of the economic gains during
13
the 40 years preceding the date of enactment of this
14
Act have accrued to the top of the income distribu-
15
tion. Between 1980 and 2014, the average income of
16
the top 1 percent of the income distribution grew 5
17
times as much as the average income of the bottom
18
90 percent of the income distribution and more than
19
9 times as much as the average income of the bot-
20
tom 1⁄2.
21
(7) Official and timely estimates of distribu-
22
tional growth from BEA, reported alongside top-line
23
GDP numbers, would enable Congress to better
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•S 3102 IS
evaluate economic policies that impact every indi-
1
vidual in the United States.
2
(8) Efforts to address slow wage growth, stag-
3
nant incomes, and growing economic inequality re-
4
quire broadening the focus beyond GDP and obtain-
5
ing metrics that better correspond to the experiences
6
of all families in the United States.
7
SEC. 3. ESTIMATES OF AGGREGATE ECONOMIC GROWTH
8
ACROSS INCOME GROUPS.
9
(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
10
(1) BUREAU.—The term ‘‘Bureau’’ means the
11
Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of
12
Commerce.
13
(2) GROSS
DOMESTIC
PRODUCT
ANALYSIS.—
14
The term ‘‘gross domestic product analysis’’—
15
(A) means a quarterly or annual analysis
16
conducted by the Bureau with respect to the
17
gross domestic product of the United States;
18
and
19
(B) includes a revision prepared by the
20
Bureau of an analysis described in subpara-
21
graph (A).
22
(b) INCLUSION IN REPORTS.—
23
(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each gross
24
domestic product analysis that is conducted on or
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•S 3102 IS
after the date that is 1 year after the date of enact-
1
ment of this Act, the Bureau shall include in the
2
gross domestic product analysis a recent estimate of,
3
with respect to specific percentile groups of income,
4
the total amount that was added to the economy of
5
the United States during the period to which the
6
gross domestic product analysis pertains, including
7
in—
8
(A) each of the 10 deciles of income; and
9
(B) the highest 1 percent of income.
10
(2) RECENT ESTIMATES.—With respect to each
11
recent estimate that, under paragraph (1), the Bu-
12
reau is required to include in a gross domestic prod-
13
uct analysis, that estimate shall be the most recent
14
estimate that is available on the date on which that
15
gross domestic product analysis is conducted.
16
(3) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.—
17
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec-
18
retary of Commerce such sums as are necessary to
19
carry out this subsection.
20
(c) AUTHORITY TO SHARE INFORMATION WITH
21
BEA.—
22
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section
23
6103(j)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is
24
amended by striking ‘‘such return information re-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•S 3102 IS
flected on returns of corporations’’ and inserting
1
‘‘such returns, or return information reflected there-
2
on,’’.
3
(2) APPLICATION OF SUBCHAPTER III OF CHAP-
4
TER 35 OF TITLE 44.—The provisions of subchapter
5
III of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, re-
6
lating to the confidentiality and disclosure of infor-
7
mation shall apply to any return or return informa-
8
tion
acquired
by
the
Bureau
under
section
9
6103(j)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, as
10
amended by paragraph (1).
11
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:57 Dec 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\S3102.IS
S3102
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.