Federal
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the House of Representatives should, consistent with long-standing practice and precedent, prior to proceeding any further with its impeachment investigation into President Donald J. Trump, vote to open a formal impeachment inquiry and provide President Trump with fundamental constitutional protections.
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,145 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
III
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. RES. 378
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the House of Representatives should,
consistent with long-standing practice and precedent, prior to proceeding
any further with its impeachment investigation into President Donald
J. Trump, vote to open a formal impeachment inquiry and provide
President Trump with fundamental constitutional protections.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER 24, 2019
Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. THUNE, Mr.
BLUNT, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BURR, Mr. BAR-
RASSO, Mr. WICKER, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. LEE,
Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. CRUZ,
Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. COTTON, Mr. DAINES,
Mr. PERDUE, Ms. ERNST, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. YOUNG, Mr.
KENNEDY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr.
SHELBY, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr.
BRAUN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. SASSE, Mr. TOOMEY,
Ms. MCSALLY, and Mr. SULLIVAN) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the House of Rep-
resentatives should, consistent with long-standing prac-
tice and precedent, prior to proceeding any further with
its impeachment investigation into President Donald J.
Trump, vote to open a formal impeachment inquiry and
provide President Trump with fundamental constitutional
protections.
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:35 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6652
E:\BILLS\SR378.IS
SR378
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•SRES 378 IS
Whereas one of the cornerstones of the American Constitu-
tion is due process: the right to confront your accuser,
call witnesses on your behalf, and challenge the accusa-
tions against you;
Whereas the House of Representatives is abandoning more
than a century’s worth of precedent and tradition in im-
peachment proceedings and denying President Trump
basic fairness and due process accorded every American;
Whereas, in our nation’s history, the House has on three oc-
casions moved to formally investigate whether sufficient
grounds exist to impeach a President, and in all three of
these cases, the full House voted on a resolution author-
izing the House Judiciary Committee to determine
whether to impeach the President;
Whereas, in the case of President Trump, a formal impeach-
ment process involving debate and a vote by the full
House prior to taking each step in the process has been
replaced by a press conference by the Speaker of the
House;
Whereas the proposition that the Speaker acting alone may
direct committees to initiate impeachment proceedings
without any debate or a vote on the House floor is un-
precedented and undemocratic;
Whereas the House is denying President Trump due process
within the ‘‘inquiry’’ itself;
Whereas, for the impeachment investigations of President
Richard M. Nixon and President William J. Clinton, the
House Judiciary Committee adopted rules of procedure to
provide due process rights and ensure fairness;
Whereas these rights included—
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:35 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SR378.IS
SR378
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•SRES 378 IS
(1) allowing the President to be represented by
counsel;
(2) permitting the President’s counsel to be present
at all hearings and depositions;
(3) permitting the President’s counsel to present evi-
dence and object to the admission of evidence;
(4) allowing the President’s counsel to call and
cross-examine witnesses; and
(5) giving the President’s counsel access to, and the
ability to respond to, the evidence adduced by the Com-
mittee;
Whereas, by contrast, the House’s current impeachment ‘‘in-
quiry’’ provides none of these basic rights and protections
to President Trump;
Whereas the main allegations against President Trump are
based on assertions and testimony from witnesses whom
he is unable to confront, as part of a process in which
he is not able to offer witnesses in his defense or have
a basic understanding of the allegations lodged against
him;
Whereas all witness interviews that have been conducted thus
far in the House have been behind closed doors with lim-
ited minority participation;
Whereas the House’s current impeachment ‘‘inquiry’’ ignores
the procedural rights given to the investigating commit-
tee’s minority in previous Presidential impeachments, in-
cluding granting equal subpoena power to both the chair
and ranking member of the committee;
Whereas, the House is denying President Trump the same
basic pre-inquiry rights afforded to President Clinton;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:35 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SR378.IS
SR378
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•SRES 378 IS
Whereas the Whitewater Investigation involved nearly five
years of painstaking investigative work by a special coun-
sel and an independent counsel before the House even
voted to have the Judiciary Committee open an impeach-
ment inquiry;
Whereas President Clinton vigorously fought that investiga-
tion, including by raising multiple privilege claims and he
was permitted to fully litigate those claims through the
courts;
Whereas President Trump, by contrast, fully cooperated with
Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller’s investigation;
Whereas, during the course of the Mueller investigation,
President Trump never raised privilege claims, he turned
over more than one million pages of documents, he di-
rected senior aides to testify freely, including making the
White House Counsel available to testify for more than
thirty hours, and he agreed to answer written questions
on penalty of perjury; and
Whereas, rather than giving President Trump the same due
process rights that President Clinton had to raise and
litigate claims of constitutional privilege, House Intel-
ligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has repeatedly
threatened to use President Trump’s assertion of his con-
stitutional rights as evidence of obstruction and to im-
peach President Trump for trying to litigate those claims:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Senate—
1
(1) calls on the House of Representatives, prior
2
to proceeding any further with its impeachment in-
3
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:35 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\SR378.IS
SR378
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•SRES 378 IS
vestigation into President Trump, to vote to initiate
1
a formal impeachment inquiry;
2
(2) calls on the House of Representatives to
3
provide President Trump, like every other American,
4
with due process, to include the ability to confront
5
his accusers, call witnesses on his behalf, and have
6
a basic understanding of the accusations against him
7
that would form any basis for impeachment; and
8
(3) calls on the House of Representatives to
9
provide members of the minority with the ability to
10
participate fully in all proceedings and have equal
11
authority to issue subpoenas and other compulsory
12
process.
13
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:35 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\SR378.IS
SR378
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.