Federal
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) continues to make an invaluable contribution to United States and international security, and noting former Senator Richard G. Lugar's indispensable contributions to international security and reducing nuclear weapons-related risks.
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,826 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
III
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. CON. RES. 16
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) continues to make an invaluable contribution
to United States and international security, and noting former Senator
Richard G. Lugar’s indispensable contributions to international security
and reducing nuclear weapons-related risks.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MAY 15, 2019
Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. PAUL, Mr.
MARKEY, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. BROWN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CARDIN, Mrs.
GILLIBRAND, Ms. SMITH, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign
Relations
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) continues
to make an invaluable contribution to United States and
international security, and noting former Senator Rich-
ard G. Lugar’s indispensable contributions to inter-
national security and reducing nuclear weapons-related
risks.
Whereas the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Weapons (NPT) opened for signature 50 years ago on
July 1, 1968;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2
•SCON 16 IS
Whereas the United States and the former Soviet Union
averted a catastrophic nuclear exchange during the Octo-
ber 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, which led to a series of
bilateral and multilateral agreements to lessen the chance
of nuclear war, including the NPT;
Whereas President John F. Kennedy predicted in 1963 that
as many as 25 countries would acquire nuclear weapons
by 1970 absent a treaty to control nuclear weapons;
Whereas the United States Senate provided its advice and
consent to the NPT on March 13, 1969, with a vote on
ratification of 83 to 15;
Whereas the NPT has grown to include 191 State Parties,
making an irreplaceable contribution to international se-
curity by preventing the spread of nuclear weapons;
Whereas former Senator Richard G. Lugar made indispen-
sable contributions to reducing nuclear weapon risks,
most notably through his leadership in standing up the
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (commonly re-
ferred to as the ‘‘Nunn-Lugar Program’’), which elimi-
nated 7,600 nuclear weapons in the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Senator Lugar successfully secured the advice and
consent of the Senate to the Treaty between the United
States of America and the Russian Federation on Meas-
ures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Stra-
tegic Offensive Arms, signed at Prague April 8, 2010,
and entered into force February 5, 2011 (commonly
known as the ‘‘New START Treaty’’);
Whereas Article III of the NPT obligates each nonnuclear
weapon state to the NPT to conclude a Safeguards
Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) to verify treaty compliance, 174 of which are
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3
•SCON 16 IS
Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements crafted to detect
the diversion of nuclear materials from peaceful to non-
peaceful uses;
Whereas the 2018 Department of Defense Nuclear Posture
Review affirms, ‘‘The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT) is a cornerstone of the nuclear nonproliferation
regime. It plays a positive role in building consensus for
non-proliferation and enhances international efforts to
impose costs on those that would pursue nuclear weapons
outside the Treaty.’’;
Whereas the success of the NPT has and will continue to de-
pend upon the full implementation by all State Parties of
the Treaty’s three mutually reinforcing pillars: non-
proliferation, access to peaceful uses of nuclear energy,
and disarmament;
Whereas, over the past half century, the United States has
exhibited leadership in strengthening each of the NPT’s
three pillars for the global good, including—
(1) reducing its nuclear weapons stockpile by more
than 85 percent from its Cold War heights of 31,225 in
parallel with equally massive reductions of the Russian
Federation’s stockpile through bilateral coordination;
(2) cooperating with Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and
Belarus to facilitate the surrender of nuclear weapons on
their soil after the fall of the Soviet Union—leading to
each country’s accession to the NPT as nonnuclear weap-
ons states;
(3) providing voluntary contributions to the IAEA to
promote
peaceful
nuclear
activities
exceeding
$378,000,000 since 2010, including activities that help in
the treatment of cancer and other life-saving applications;
and
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4
•SCON 16 IS
(4) extending deterrence to United States allies in
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Japan,
and the Republic of Korea—which is an unmistakable
demonstration of the United States commitment to col-
lective security;
Whereas heightened geopolitical tensions in recent years have
made cooperation on nonproliferation and arms control
issues with the Russian Federation more challenging;
Whereas a range of actions by the Government of the Rus-
sian Federation has led to a deterioration in bilateral re-
lations with the United States, including Russia’s brazen
interference in the 2016 United States presidential elec-
tions, its violation of the Treaty between the United
States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Re-
publics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range
and Shorter-Range Missiles (commonly known as the
‘‘INF Treaty’’), signed at Washington, DC, December 8,
1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988, its use of a
chemical nerve agent in an assassination attempt against
Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in the United
Kingdom in March 2018, its illegal annexation of Cri-
mea, its invasion of Eastern Ukraine, and its desta-
bilizing actions in Syria;
Whereas, within a difficult environment, preserving agree-
ments that continue to contribute to United States and
global security, particularly the New START Treaty, is
important, and that to that end, the Department of State
confirmed in February 2018 that Russia had met New
START’s Central Treaty Limits and stated that ‘‘imple-
mentation of the New START Treaty enhances the safe-
ty and security of the United States’’;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
5
•SCON 16 IS
Whereas United States efforts to reduce dangers associated
with nuclear arsenals through ambitious arms control
agreements with both the Russian Federation and the
People’s Republic of China would advance United States
and global security, adding to the benefits of stability and
transparency provided by existing agreements;
Whereas, in a March 2018 speech, President Vladimir Putin
of the Russian Federation unveiled details of new kinds
of strategic nuclear weapons under development, includ-
ing hypersonic nuclear weapons, nuclear-powered cruise
missiles, and multi-megaton nuclear torpedoes shot from
drone submarines that may be accountable under the
New START Treaty;
Whereas the Russian Federation erroneously claimed that the
United States may have not reached New START Treaty
central limits by February 5, 2018, as is mandated by
the Treaty;
Whereas the Bilateral Consultative Commission (BCC) is the
appropriate forum for the Parties to engage construc-
tively on any New START Treaty implementation issues
that arise; and
Whereas the collapse of the INF Treaty and expiration of the
New START Treaty would lead to the absence of any
binding, bilateral treaty or agreement governing United
States and Russian nuclear forces, which account for 90
percent of those currently in existence globally, for the
first time since 1972: Now, therefore be it
Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives
1
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—
2
(1) the United States should continue to en-
3
courage all States Party to the Treaty on the Non-
4
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
6
•SCON 16 IS
Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) to comply
1
fully with the Treaty;
2
(2) the United States should maintain support
3
for the IAEA through its assessed and voluntary
4
contributions and promote the universal adoption of
5
the IAEA Additional Protocol;
6
(3) the United States should—
7
(A) consider extending the New START
8
Treaty, within the context of wider enhance-
9
ment of strategic stability between the United
10
States and the Russian Federation and pro-
11
vided the Treaty continues to advance United
12
States national security;
13
(B) assess whether Russia’s recently an-
14
nounced nuclear capabilities should be account-
15
able under the New START Treaty, and raise
16
the issue directly with the Russian Federation;
17
(C) conclude an interagency process to
18
consider an extension of the New START Trea-
19
ty and to engage with the Russian Federation
20
on the full range of strategic stability issues
21
and other arms control and nonproliferation
22
issues;
23
(D) begin negotiations with the Russian
24
Federation on an agreement to address the
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
7
•SCON 16 IS
massive disparity between the nonstrategic nu-
1
clear weapons stockpiles of the Russian Federa-
2
tion and of the United States and to secure and
3
reduce nonstrategic nuclear weapons in a
4
verifiable manner; and
5
(E) consider the consequences of the New
6
START Treaty’s expiration in 2021 in relation
7
to the insights it provides into the location,
8
movement, and disposition of current and fu-
9
ture Russian strategic systems;
10
(4) the United States strongly condemns the
11
Russian Federation’s violations of the INF Treaty
12
and its noncompliance with its other arms control
13
commitments and treaty obligations, and urges the
14
Russian Federation to come back into full compli-
15
ance;
16
(5) in responding to the Russian Federation’s
17
deployment of INF-range systems, advocate for
18
those defense and deterrence steps which preserve
19
NATO alliance cohesion and are aimed at averting
20
an arms race on the European continent;
21
(6) pursuit of a verifiable and comprehensive
22
arms control agreement with the Russian Federation
23
and the People’s Republic of China, which may cap-
24
ture strategic and nonstrategic nuclear weapons ca-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
8
•SCON 16 IS
pabilities, would enhance United States and global
1
security by building upon other treaties, agreements,
2
and transparency measures that reduce nuclear risk;
3
and
4
(7) the United States should continue to en-
5
courage opportunities for cooperation with other nu-
6
clear weapon possessing states to reduce the sa-
7
lience, number, and role of nuclear weapons in their
8
national military strategies.
9
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:45 May 16, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\SC16.IS
SC16
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.