Federal
Protect Children, Farmers, and Farmworkers from Nerve Agent Pesticides Act of 2019
Source: Congress.gov ·
2,583 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 921
To prohibit the use of chlorpyrifos on food, to prohibit the registration
of pesticides containing chlorpyrifos, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MARCH 28, 2019
Mr. UDALL (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. CARDIN, Mrs.
FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MARKEY,
Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and
Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and re-
ferred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
A BILL
To prohibit the use of chlorpyrifos on food, to prohibit the
registration of pesticides containing chlorpyrifos, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Children,
4
Farmers, and Farmworkers from Nerve Agent Pesticides
5
Act of 2019’’.
6
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
7
Congress finds as follows:
8
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•S 921 IS
(1) In 1996, Congress unanimously passed the
1
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (Public Law
2
104–170; 110 Stat. 1489) (referred to in this sec-
3
tion as ‘‘FQPA’’), a comprehensive overhaul of Fed-
4
eral pesticide and food safety policy. That Act
5
amended the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
6
Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.) (referred to
7
in this section as ‘‘FIFRA’’) and the Federal Food,
8
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the
9
laws that govern how the Environmental Protection
10
Agency (referred to in this section as the ‘‘EPA’’)
11
registers pesticides and pesticide labels for use in the
12
United States and establishes tolerances or accept-
13
able levels for pesticide residues on food.
14
(2) The FQPA directs the EPA to ensure with
15
‘‘reasonable certainty’’ that ‘‘no harm’’ will result
16
from food, drinking water, and other exposures to a
17
pesticide. If the EPA cannot make this safety find-
18
ing, it must prohibit residues and use of the pes-
19
ticide on food. The FQPA mandates that the EPA
20
must consider children’s special sensitivity and expo-
21
sure to pesticide chemicals and must make an ex-
22
plicit determination that the pesticide can be used
23
with a ‘‘reasonable certainty of no harm’’ to chil-
24
dren. In determining acceptable levels of pesticide
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•S 921 IS
residue, the EPA must account for the potential
1
health harm from pre- and postnatal exposures. The
2
economic benefits of pesticides cannot be used to
3
override this health-based standard for children from
4
food and other exposures.
5
(3) Chlorpyrifos is a widely used pesticide first
6
registered by the EPA in 1965. Chlorpyrifos is an
7
organophosphate pesticide, a class of pesticides de-
8
veloped as nerve agents in World War II and adapt-
9
ed for use as insecticides after the war. Chlorpyrifos
10
and other organophosphate pesticides affect the
11
nervous system through inhibition of cholinesterase,
12
an enzyme required for proper nerve functioning.
13
Acute poisonings occur when nerve impulses pulsate
14
through the body, causing symptoms like nausea,
15
vomiting, convulsions, respiratory paralysis, and, in
16
extreme cases, death. Based on dozens of peer-re-
17
viewed scientific articles, the EPA determined that
18
exposure during pregnancy to even low levels of
19
chlorpyrifos that caused only minimal cholinesterase
20
inhibition (10 percent or less) in the mothers could
21
lead to measurable long-lasting and possibly perma-
22
nent neurobehavioral and functional deficits in pre-
23
natally exposed children.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•S 921 IS
(4) People, including pregnant women, are ex-
1
posed to chlorpyrifos through residues on food, con-
2
taminated drinking water, and toxic spray drift from
3
nearby pesticide applications. Chlorpyrifos is used on
4
an extensive variety of crops, including fruit and nut
5
trees, vegetables, wheat, alfalfa, and corn. Between
6
2006 and 2012, chlorpyrifos was applied to more
7
than 50 percent of the Nation’s apple and broccoli
8
crops, 45 percent of onion crops, 46 percent of wal-
9
nut crops, and 41 percent of cauliflower crops.
10
(5) Chlorpyrifos is acutely toxic and associated
11
with neurodevelopmental harms in children. Prenatal
12
exposure to chlorpyrifos is associated with elevated
13
risks of reduced IQ, loss of working memory, delays
14
in motor development, attention-deficit disorders,
15
and structural changes in the brain.
16
(6) There is no nationwide chlorpyrifos use re-
17
porting. The United States Geological Survey esti-
18
mates annual pesticide use on agricultural land in
19
the United States, and estimates that chlorpyrifos
20
use on crops in 2014 ranged from 5,000,000 to
21
7,000,000 pounds of chlorpyrifos.
22
(7) In its 2016 report, the Federal Insecticide,
23
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory
24
Panel recognized ‘‘the growing body of literature
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•S 921 IS
with laboratory animals (rats and mice) indicating
1
that gestational and/or early postnatal exposure to
2
chlorpyrifos may cause persistent effects into adult-
3
hood along with epidemiology studies which have
4
evaluated prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure in mother-
5
infant pairs and reported associations with neurode-
6
velopment outcomes in infants and children.’’.
7
(8) Chlorpyrifos has long been of concern to the
8
EPA. Residential uses of chlorpyrifos ended in 2000
9
after the EPA found unsafe exposures to children.
10
The EPA also discontinued use of chlorpyrifos on to-
11
matoes and restricted its use on apples and grapes
12
in 2000, and obtained no-spray buffers around
13
schools, homes, playfields, day cares, hospitals, and
14
other public places, ranging from 10 to 100 feet. In
15
2015, the EPA proposed to ban all chlorpyrifos food
16
tolerances, based on unsafe drinking water contami-
17
nation, which would end use of chlorpyrifos on food
18
in the United States. After updating the risk assess-
19
ment for chlorpyrifos in November 2016 to protect
20
against prenatal exposures associated with brain im-
21
pacts, the EPA found that expected residues from
22
use on food crops exceeded the safety standard, and
23
additionally the majority of estimated drinking water
24
exposures from currently allowed uses of chlorpyrifos
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•S 921 IS
also exceeded acceptable levels, reinforcing the need
1
to revoke all food tolerances for the pesticide.
2
(9) Chlorpyrifos threatens the healthy develop-
3
ment of children. Children experience greater expo-
4
sure to chlorpyrifos and other pesticides because,
5
relative to adults, they eat and drink more propor-
6
tional to their body weight. A growing body of evi-
7
dence shows that prenatal exposure to very low lev-
8
els of chlorpyrifos can lead to lasting and possibly
9
permanent neurological impairments. In November
10
2016, the EPA released a revised human health risk
11
assessment for chlorpyrifos that confirmed that
12
there are no acceptable uses for the pesticide, all
13
food uses exceed acceptable levels, with children ages
14
1 to 2 exposed to levels of chlorpyrifos that are 140
15
times what the EPA considers acceptable.
16
(10) Chlorpyrifos threatens agricultural work-
17
ers. Farm workers are exposed to chlorpyrifos from
18
mixing, handling, and applying the pesticide, as well
19
as from entering fields where chlorpyrifos was re-
20
cently sprayed. Chlorpyrifos is one of the pesticides
21
most often linked to acute pesticide poisonings, and
22
in many States, it is regularly identified among the
23
5 pesticides linked to the highest number of pes-
24
ticide poisoning incidents. This is significant given
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
7
•S 921 IS
widespread underreporting of pesticide poisonings
1
due to such factors as inadequate reporting systems,
2
fear of retaliation from employers, and reluctance to
3
seek medical treatment. According to the EPA, all
4
workers who mix and apply chlorpyrifos are exposed
5
to unsafe levels of the pesticide even with maximum
6
personal protective equipment and engineering con-
7
trols. Field workers are currently allowed to re-enter
8
fields within 1 to 5 days after chlorpyrifos is sprayed
9
based on current restricted entry intervals on the
10
registered chlorpyrifos labels but unsafe exposures
11
continue on average 18 days after applications.
12
(11) Chlorpyrifos threatens families in agricul-
13
tural communities. Rural families are exposed to un-
14
safe levels of chlorpyrifos on their food and in their
15
drinking water. They are also exposed to toxic levels
16
of chlorpyrifos when it drifts from the fields to
17
homes, schools, and other places people gather. The
18
EPA’s 2016 revised human health risk assessment
19
found that chlorpyrifos drift reaches unsafe levels at
20
300 feet away from the edge of the treated field, and
21
the chemical chlorpyrifos is found at unsafe levels in
22
the air at schools, homes, and communities in agri-
23
cultural areas. The small buffers put in place in
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
8
•S 921 IS
2012 leave children unprotected from this toxic pes-
1
ticide drift.
2
(12) Chlorpyrifos threatens drinking water. The
3
EPA’s 2014 and 2016 risk assessments have found
4
that chlorpyrifos levels in drinking water are unsafe.
5
People living and working in agricultural commu-
6
nities are likely to be exposed to higher levels of
7
chlorpyrifos and other organophosphate pesticides in
8
their drinking water.
9
(13) In 2015, leading scientific and medical ex-
10
perts, along with children’s health advocates, came
11
together, under ‘‘Project TENDR: Targeting Envi-
12
ronmental Neuro-Developmental Risks’’ (referred to
13
in this section as ‘‘TENDR’’), to issue a call to ac-
14
tion to reduce widespread exposures to chemicals
15
that interfere with fetal and children’s brain develop-
16
ment. Based on the available and peer-reviewed sci-
17
entific evidence, the TENDR authors identified
18
prime examples of neurodevelopmentally toxic chemi-
19
cals ‘‘that can contribute to learning, behavioral, or
20
intellectual
impairment,
as
well
as
specific
21
neurodevelopmental disorders such as ADHD or au-
22
tism spectrum disorder,’’ and listed organophosphate
23
pesticides, among them. In 2018, leading scientists
24
involved with TENDR published an article in PLOS
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
9
•S 921 IS
Medicine that found that prenatal exposure to
1
organophosphate pesticides such as chlorpyrifos,
2
even at low levels that were previously considered
3
safe, are putting children at risk for cognitive and
4
behavioral deficits and neurodevelopmental dis-
5
orders. The scientists recommended phasing out
6
chlorpyrifos.
7
(14) In August 2018, based on overwhelming
8
findings that chlorpyrifos is unsafe for public health,
9
and particularly harmful to children and farm-
10
workers, the United States Court of Appeals for the
11
Ninth Circuit ordered the EPA to move forward
12
with a ban of chlorpyrifos, stating that ‘‘the time
13
has come to put a stop to this patent evasion’’ of the
14
law. However, instead of complying with the court
15
order, the EPA has appealed the ruling.
16
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CHLORPYRIFOS ON FOOD.
17
Section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
18
Act (21 U.S.C. 342) is amended by adding at the end the
19
following:
20
‘‘(j) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if
21
it bears or contains chlorpyrifos, including any residue of
22
chlorpyrifos, or any other added substance that is present
23
on or in the food primarily as a result of the metabolism
24
or other degradation of chlorpyrifos.’’.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
10
•S 921 IS
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON REGISTRATION OF PESTICIDES
1
CONTAINING CHLORPYRIFOS.
2
Section 3(f) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
3
and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is amended by
4
adding at the end the following:
5
‘‘(5) PROHIBITION ON REGISTRATION OF PES-
6
TICIDES CONTAINING CHLORPYRIFOS.—
7
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The Administrator
8
shall not register under this Act any pesticide
9
containing chlorpyrifos as an active ingredient.
10
‘‘(B)
CANCELLATION
OF
REGISTRA-
11
TIONS.—The Administrator shall cancel the
12
registration under this Act of any pesticide con-
13
taining chlorpyrifos as an active ingredient.
14
‘‘(C)
ADMINISTRATION.—The
Adminis-
15
trator shall carry out subparagraph (B) without
16
regard to sections 6(a)(1), 6(b), and 15.’’.
17
SEC. 5. PESTICIDES AND DEVICES INTENDED FOR EXPORT.
18
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 17(a) of the Federal In-
19
secticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C.
20
136o(a)) is amended—
21
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as
22
subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and indent-
23
ing appropriately;
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
07:26 Apr 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S921.IS
S921
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
11
•S 921 IS
(2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)
1
(as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’
2
and inserting the following:
3
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
4
graph (3), notwithstanding’’;
5
(3) in the undesignated matter following para-
6
graph (1)(B) (as so designated), by striking ‘‘A copy
7
of that statement’’ and inserting the following:
8
‘‘(2) TRANSMISSION
TO
APPROPRIATE
OFFI-
9
CIAL.—A copy of the statement described in para-
10
graph (1)(B)’’; and
11
(4) by adding at the end the following:
12
‘‘(3) EXCEPTION FOR PESTICIDES CONTAINING
13
CHLORPYRIFOS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to
14
any pesticide containing chlorpyrifos as an active in-
15
gredient.’’.
16
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on Congress.gov.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.