What This Bill Does
This bill stops the United States from sending military aid and training to the Philippines' police and military forces. The aid stays suspended until the Philippine government fixes serious human rights problems within its security forces. The bill also requires a detailed report on all past military help sent to the Philippines since 2016.
##
Who It Affects
- The Philippine National Police (the police force of the Philippines)
- The Armed Forces of the Philippines (the military)
- U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense
- U.S. representatives at international development banks (organizations that loan money to countries)
- U.S. Congress committees that oversee foreign affairs
- Philippine government officials responsible for military and police operations
##
Key Provisions
- No federal funds can be used to provide military equipment, training or other assistance to Philippine police or military forces (Sec. 3(a))
- The President must instruct U.S. representatives at multilateral development banks (international lending organizations) to vote against loans to Philippine police or military (Sec. 3(b))
- The State Department and Department of Defense must submit a report within 180 days listing all military aid given to the Philippines since January 1, 2016, including how that aid was used and any misuses (Sec. 3(c))
- The Secretary of State can lift the aid suspension only after certifying that the Philippines has: investigated and prosecuted military and police members who violated human rights; removed the military from domestic police work and made police answer to civilian leaders instead; protected the rights of journalists, labor activists and human rights defenders; created a working court system to hold police and military accountable; and fully cooperated with audits of past military aid (Sec. 3(d))
##
What Changes
If this bill becomes law, the United States must immediately stop providing military equipment and training to Philippine police and military. The U.S. must also vote against any loans to these forces at international development banks. The State Department and Defense Department must produce a detailed accounting of every piece of military equipment and training sent to the Philippines since 2016 and report any misuses, including extrajudicial killings (killings carried out without legal trials), intimidation of political opponents, or theft of equipment.
Security aid only resumes if the Philippine government meets five specific conditions verified by the Secretary of State.
##
Important Definitions
- **Extrajudicial killings:** Killings carried out by government agents without legal arrest, trial or court process
- **Red-tagging:** The practice of labeling activists, critics and organizations as terrorists
- **Multilateral development banks:** International organizations that provide loans and financial help to countries
- **Human rights violations:** Actions by government that harm basic freedoms like life, safety, fair treatment and freedom to speak
##
Effective Date
Not specified in bill text
I
118TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 1433
To suspend the provision of security assistance to the Philippines until the
Government of the Philippines has made certain reforms to the military
and police forces, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 7, 2023
Ms. WILD (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GARCI´A of Illinois, Mr. MCGOV-
ERN, Mr. POCAN, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. OMAR, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. GRIJALVA,
and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Fi-
nancial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within
the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To suspend the provision of security assistance to the Phil-
ippines until the Government of the Philippines has made
certain reforms to the military and police forces, and
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Philippine Human
4
Rights Act’’.
5
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2
•HR 1433 IH
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
1
Congress finds the following:
2
(1) The United States State Department’s
3
2021 Human Rights Report on the Philippines
4
found ‘‘significant human rights issues’’ in the coun-
5
try, including ‘‘extrajudicial killings, by and on be-
6
half of the government and nonstate actors; reports
7
of forced disappearance by and on behalf of the gov-
8
ernment and nonstate actors; torture by and on be-
9
half of the government and nonstate actors; harsh
10
and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary de-
11
tention by and on behalf of the government and
12
nonstate actors; serious problems with the independ-
13
ence of the judiciary.’’ The Report also notes, ‘‘seri-
14
ous restrictions on free expression and media, in-
15
cluding violence, threats of violence, and unjustified
16
arrests or prosecutions of journalists, censorship,
17
and the use of criminal libel laws to punish journal-
18
ists; high-level and widespread government corrup-
19
tion; serious government restrictions on or harass-
20
ment of domestic human rights organizations; and
21
threats and violence against labor activists’’.
22
(2) The United Nations Office of the High
23
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), re-
24
ported in September 2022, that major human rights
25
issues persist in the Philippines, including, ‘‘harass-
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3
•HR 1433 IH
ment, threats, arrests, attacks, red-tagging against
1
civil society actors, as well as the continued drug re-
2
lated killings by police,’’ and, ‘‘access to justice for
3
victims of human rights violations and abuses re-
4
mained very limited’’.
5
(3) A 2021 international independent investiga-
6
tion, Investigate Philippines, found that since 2020,
7
‘‘the perpetuation of human rights violations by
8
State forces has become more institutionalized,
9
streamlined, and entrenched, and domestic remedies
10
for such violations are insufficient, ineffective at pro-
11
viding redress and halting continued abuses’’. Said
12
investigation further found: police and military
13
forces are perpetuating violations and obstructing
14
justice; investigations are not impartial; mechanisms
15
for civilians to hold police and military accountable
16
are failing; court protections are inaccessible, slow
17
and discriminatory; government forces are orches-
18
trating political repression and militarizing govern-
19
ance; counterinsurgency activities are targeting law-
20
yers and denying victims access to counsel; efforts to
21
challenge unjust laws through legal channels are
22
being dismissed; public institutions and bodies which
23
should provide checks and balances or oversight have
24
been eviscerated or lack clout.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
4
•HR 1433 IH
(4) In a 2023 report, Human Rights Watch re-
1
ports there has been ‘‘no letup’’ in the War on drugs
2
in the Philippines under the Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
3
administration, which leading human rights organi-
4
zations estimate took up to 30,000 lives under
5
former President Rodrigo Duterte.
6
(5) According to the Joint Report of Trade
7
Unions to the International Labor Organization,
8
from 2019 to the beginning of 2023, there have been
9
16 killing of trade unionists, two cases of forced dis-
10
appearances, 68 cases of arrests and detention, 90
11
cases of forced disaffiliation, 58 cases of red-tagging,
12
and 127 cases of intimidation of union leaders and
13
members. Additionally, the Report notes that the
14
Government of the Philippines has failed to act on
15
any previous recommendations by the International
16
Labor Organization to protect workers’ rights, and
17
responded directly to recommendations that, ‘‘it re-
18
quires further clarification as to what constitutes ef-
19
fective measures to prevent violence against workers;
20
what constitutes immediate and effective investiga-
21
tion’’.
22
(6) In 2022, the International Trade Union
23
Confederation (ITUC) listed the Philippines as one
24
of the ‘‘10 worst countries in the world for working
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
5
•HR 1433 IH
people’’ for the sixth consecutive year. In its 2022
1
report, the ITUC stated: ‘‘Workers and their rep-
2
resentatives in the Philippines remained particularly
3
vulnerable to violent attacks, intimidation and arbi-
4
trary arrests. Trade unionists, maliciously red-
5
tagged by President Duterte, remained under imme-
6
diate threat from the police and the army, which
7
conducted targeted raids against them. Over 50
8
trade unionists have been killed since President
9
Duterte came to power in 2016’’.
10
(7) In the first six months of the Marcos ad-
11
ministration alone, the Alliance for Advancement of
12
People’s Rights (Karapatan) has documented 17
13
extrajudicial killings, 165 illegal arrests, 9,159
14
forced evacuations, and 357,726 cases of harassment
15
and intimidation.
16
(8) In 2021, the international NGO Global Wit-
17
ness declared the Philippines to be the deadliest
18
country in Asia for environmental activists for the
19
ninth consecutive year. Since President Duterte took
20
office in 2016, 30 environmentalists, 54 indigenous
21
people, and 207 farmers and peasants have been
22
extrajudicially killed. Included in the targeting of en-
23
vironmental activists during this timeframe, was
24
United States citizen, Brandon Lee, who was sub-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
6
•HR 1433 IH
jected to an assassination attempt on August 6,
1
2019. Brandon Lee has been subjected to repeated
2
threats and harassment by the Philippine military
3
due to his advocacy relating to the land and rights
4
of indigenous people in Ifugao province and the sur-
5
rounding Cordillera region of the Philippines. While
6
Brandon Lee survived the attack, he has been left
7
paralyzed and his assailants have not been brought
8
to justice.
9
(9) Philippine State actors have targeted law-
10
yers, judges, and politicians for repression. Accord-
11
ing to the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers, 133
12
Filipino lawyers have been murdered over the past
13
40 years, with 59 being murdered during Duterte’s
14
6-year term as President.
15
(10) Since February 2017, Senator Leila de
16
Lima, vocal critic of the Government of the Phil-
17
ippines’ human rights violations, has been jailed on
18
spurious charges. Amnesty International, other lead-
19
ing human rights organizations, and the Working
20
Group on Arbitrary Detention in the Office of the
21
United Nations High Commissioner for Human
22
Rights have documented the fabricated charges, co-
23
erced testimonies, and other violations of Senator de
24
Lima’s rights that have occurred. This case reflects
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
7
•HR 1433 IH
a broader pattern, with authorities in the Philippines
1
consistently targeting political opposition leaders
2
through politically motivated, spurious charges.
3
(11) It is widely recognized that the Govern-
4
ment of the Philippines silences dissent and the
5
press. In May 2020, ABS-CBN, one of the Phil-
6
ippines’ two major sources of news, and an occa-
7
sional critic of Duterte’s policies, was forced off air
8
due to the denial of a franchise license by the Con-
9
gress of the Philippines, at the behest of the Duterte
10
administration. Similarly, Maria Ressa, a vocal critic
11
of the repressive practices of State security forces,
12
recipient of the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize, and found-
13
er of the digital news site Rappler was convicted of
14
cyber libel in June 2020. Multiple journalists critical
15
of the Government, including Percy Lapid—a radio
16
broadcaster and critic of the Marcos administration
17
who was killed in October 2022—have been mur-
18
dered since the beginning of the Marcos administra-
19
tion. And according to Freedom House’s 2022 re-
20
port on the Philippines, ‘‘impunity remains the norm
21
for violent crimes against activists and journalists’’.
22
(12) On March 7, 2021, nine activists were
23
killed in a joint operation conducted by the Phil-
24
ippine National Police and the Armed Forces of the
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
8
•HR 1433 IH
Philippines in an event widely referred to as ‘‘Bloody
1
Sunday’’ in the Philippines. Included in those who
2
were killed by State security forces was labor leader
3
Emmanuel ‘‘Manny’’ Asuncion. The Philippines’ De-
4
partment of Justice has declined to prosecute indi-
5
viduals implicated in the murder of Manny Asun-
6
cion, as well as in the murders of other activists.
7
This failure to bring perpetrators to justice reflects
8
the systemic lack of accountability within Philippine
9
State security forces and prosecutorial agencies.
10
(13) On July 3, 2020, the Anti-Terrorism Act
11
of the Philippines was passed into law. While pur-
12
porting to counter terrorism, the bill rolls back many
13
civil liberties by lessening requirements for judicial
14
warrants, allows for extended pre-trial detention,
15
and allows for the prosecution of conduct that is
16
considered protected political speech. The Anti-Ter-
17
rorism Act is viewed by many as a threat to Free-
18
dom of Speech in the Philippines. Representative
19
Jan Schakowsky, along with 49 other members of
20
the United States Congress, urged the Government
21
of the Philippines to repeal ‘‘this repressive legisla-
22
tion’’.
23
(14) The practice of ‘‘red-tagging’’, wherein the
24
Government labels activists, critics, and non-govern-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
9
•HR 1433 IH
mental organizations as terrorists, has been growing
1
in the Philippines, including the red-tagging of over-
2
seas Filipinos, United States citizens, and Philippine
3
election observers. This tactic is used to isolate indi-
4
viduals or groups and chill political speech, and in
5
many cases, mark them for harassment or assassina-
6
tion by Philippines security or paramilitary forces.
7
(15) The Government of the Philippines fails to
8
cooperate in matters of international law, including
9
the International Criminal Court investigation into
10
alleged crimes committed in the Philippines between
11
November 1, 2011, and March 16, 2019, in the con-
12
text of the so-called ‘‘war on drugs’’ campaign.
13
(16) The Armed Forces of the Philippines uses
14
tactics of strafing and aerial bombings in military
15
operations that have killed dozens and displaced
16
thousands of civilians. In 2017, Armed Forces con-
17
ducted a widespread bombing campaign on Marawi
18
City, displacing 400,000 people and destroying the
19
city. In 2019, AFP bombings in Mindanao displaced
20
300 Indigenous People. In November 2021, peace
21
advocates called for a stop to ongoing aerial bomb-
22
ings in Bukidnon. In February 2022, the Armed
23
Forces dropped at least 30 bombs in Cagayan Valley
24
where there is a population of 41,680 people. In Oc-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
10
•HR 1433 IH
tober 2022, the 94th infantry battalion conducted
1
strafing and bombings in Negros Occidental, result-
2
ing in over 15,000 evacuees.
3
(17) The United States continues to provide ro-
4
bust assistance to state security forces of the Phil-
5
ippines. Despite clear documentation of abuses and
6
international condemnation, in April 2020, the
7
United States announced a pair of arms sales total-
8
ing $2,000,000,000 for items including hellfire mis-
9
siles and attack helicopters. In July 2020, the
10
United States announced an additional sale of
11
$126,000,000 worth of assault boats and arma-
12
ments. In October 2022, the United States provided
13
$100,000,000 in military financing.
14
SEC. 3. SUSPENSION OF SECURITY ASSISTANCE.
15
(a) SUSPENSION
OF SECURITY ASSISTANCE.—No
16
Federal funds are authorized to be appropriated or other-
17
wise made available to provide assistance for the police
18
or military of the Philippines, including assistance in the
19
form of equipment or training, until the date described
20
in subsection (d).
21
(b) LOANS FROM MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT
22
BANKS.—The President shall instruct United States rep-
23
resentatives at multilateral development banks to vote
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 Mar 25, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1433.IH
H1433
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
11
•HR 1433 IH
against providing any loans to the police or military of
1
the Philippines.
2
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days
3
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspectors
4
General of the Department of State and Department of
5
Defense shall jointly submit to the Committee on Foreign
6
Affairs of the House of Represen
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on Congress.gov.]