Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 608
To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, relating
to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enroll-
ment agreements made between students and certain institutions of high-
er education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to
pursue claims against certain institutions of higher education.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
FEBRUARY 28, 2019
Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. REED, Mr.
BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee
on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
A BILL
To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States
Code, relating to the enforcement of arbitration agree-
ments, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made
between students and certain institutions of higher edu-
cation, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of stu-
dents to pursue claims against certain institutions of
higher education.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:31 Mar 07, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S608.IS
S608
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•S 608 IS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
1
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Legal Access
2
and Student Support (CLASS) Act of 2019’’.
3
SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9,
4
UNITED STATES CODE, TO ENROLLMENT
5
AGREEMENTS MADE BETWEEN STUDENTS
6
AND CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER
7
EDUCATION.
8
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 9 of the United
9
States Code (relating to the enforcement of arbitration
10
agreements) shall not apply to an enrollment agreement
11
made between a student and an institution of higher edu-
12
cation.
13
(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘institu-
14
tion of higher education’’ has the meaning given such term
15
in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
16
U.S.C. 1002).
17
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON LIMITATIONS ON ABILITY OF STU-
18
DENTS TO PURSUE CLAIMS AGAINST CER-
19
TAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
20
Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965
21
(20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the
22
following:
23
‘‘(30) The institution will not require any stu-
24
dent to agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation
25
or restriction (including a limitation or restriction on
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:31 Mar 07, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S608.IS
S608
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•S 608 IS
any available choice of applicable law, a jury trial,
1
or venue) on the ability of a student to pursue a
2
claim, individually or with others, against an institu-
3
tion in court.’’.
4
SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
5
This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall
6
take effect 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
7
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:31 Mar 07, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\S608.IS
S608
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS