Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
117TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 393
To prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual
orientation, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
FEBRUARY 23, 2021
Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BENNET, Mr.
BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BROWN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CARPER,
Mr. CASEY, Mr. COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr.
DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HEIN-
RICH, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KELLY, Mr.
KING, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LUJA´N, Mr. MARKEY, Mr.
MENENDEZ, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. OSSOFF, Mr. PADILLA,
Mr. PETERS, Mr. REED, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr.
SCHUMER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. SMITH, Ms. STABENOW,
Mr. TESTER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WARNOCK, Ms. WAR-
REN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender
identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equality Act’’.
4
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
2
•S 393 IS
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
1
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
2
(1) Discrimination can occur on the basis of the
3
sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, pregnancy,
4
childbirth, or a related medical condition of an indi-
5
vidual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes.
6
Each of these factors alone can serve as the basis
7
for discrimination, and each is a form of sex dis-
8
crimination.
9
(2) A single instance of discrimination may
10
have more than one basis. For example, discrimina-
11
tion against a married same-sex couple could be
12
based on the sex stereotype that marriage should
13
only be between heterosexual couples, the sexual ori-
14
entation of the two individuals in the couple, or
15
both. In addition, some persons are subjected to dis-
16
crimination based on a combination or the intersec-
17
tion of multiple protected characteristics. Discrimi-
18
nation against a pregnant lesbian could be based on
19
her sex, her sexual orientation, her pregnancy, or on
20
the basis of multiple factors.
21
(3) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and
22
queer (referred to as ‘‘LGBTQ’’) people commonly
23
experience discrimination in securing access to pub-
24
lic accommodations—including restaurants, senior
25
centers, stores, places of or establishments that pro-
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
3
•S 393 IS
vide entertainment, health care facilities, shelters,
1
government offices, youth service providers including
2
adoption and foster care providers, and transpor-
3
tation. Forms of discrimination include the exclusion
4
and denial of entry, unequal or unfair treatment,
5
harassment, and violence. This discrimination pre-
6
vents the full participation of LGBTQ people in so-
7
ciety and disrupts the free flow of commerce.
8
(4) Women also have faced discrimination in
9
many establishments such as stores and restaurants,
10
and places or establishments that provide other
11
goods or services, such as entertainment or transpor-
12
tation, including sexual harassment, differential pric-
13
ing for substantially similar products and services,
14
and denial of services because they are pregnant or
15
breastfeeding.
16
(5) Many employers already and continue to
17
take proactive steps, beyond those required by some
18
States and localities, to ensure they are fostering
19
positive and respectful cultures for all employees.
20
Many places of public accommodation also recognize
21
the economic imperative to offer goods and services
22
to as many consumers as possible.
23
(6) Regular and ongoing discrimination against
24
LGBTQ people, as well as women, in accessing pub-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
4
•S 393 IS
lic accommodations contributes to negative social
1
and economic outcomes, and in the case of public ac-
2
commodations operated by State and local govern-
3
ments, abridges individuals’ constitutional rights.
4
(7) The discredited practice known as ‘‘conver-
5
sion therapy’’ is a form of discrimination that harms
6
LGBTQ people by undermining individuals’ sense of
7
self worth, increasing suicide ideation and substance
8
abuse, exacerbating family conflict, and contributing
9
to second-class status.
10
(8) Both LGBTQ people and women face wide-
11
spread discrimination in employment and various
12
services, including by entities that receive Federal fi-
13
nancial assistance. Such discrimination—
14
(A) is particularly troubling and inappro-
15
priate for programs and services funded wholly
16
or in part by the Federal Government;
17
(B) undermines national progress toward
18
equal treatment regardless of sex, sexual ori-
19
entation, or gender identity; and
20
(C) is inconsistent with the constitutional
21
principle of equal protection under the Four-
22
teenth Amendment to the Constitution of the
23
United States.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
5
•S 393 IS
(9) Federal courts have widely recognized that,
1
in enacting the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Congress
2
validly invoked its powers under the Fourteenth
3
Amendment to provide a full range of remedies in
4
response to persistent, widespread, and pervasive
5
discrimination by both private and government ac-
6
tors.
7
(10) Discrimination by State and local govern-
8
ments on the basis of sexual orientation or gender
9
identity in employment, housing, and public accom-
10
modations, and in programs and activities receiving
11
Federal financial assistance, violates the Equal Pro-
12
tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
13
Constitution of the United States. In many cir-
14
cumstances, such discrimination also violates other
15
constitutional rights such as those of liberty and pri-
16
vacy under the due process clause of the Fourteenth
17
Amendment.
18
(11) Individuals who are LGBTQ, or are per-
19
ceived to be LGBTQ, have been subjected to a his-
20
tory and pattern of persistent, widespread, and per-
21
vasive discrimination on the bases of sexual orienta-
22
tion and gender identity by both private sector and
23
Federal, State, and local government actors, includ-
24
ing in employment, housing, and public accommoda-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
6
•S 393 IS
tions, and in programs and activities receiving Fed-
1
eral financial assistance. This discrimination inflicts
2
a range of tangible and intangible harms, sometimes
3
even including serious physical injury or death. An
4
explicit and comprehensive national solution is need-
5
ed to address this discrimination, including the full
6
range of remedies available under the Civil Rights
7
Act of 1964.
8
(12) Discrimination based on sexual orientation
9
includes discrimination based on an individual’s ac-
10
tual or perceived romantic, emotional, physical, or
11
sexual attraction to other persons, or lack thereof,
12
on the basis of gender. LGBTQ people, including
13
gender nonbinary people, also commonly experience
14
discrimination because of sex-based stereotypes.
15
Many people are subjected to discrimination because
16
of others’ perceptions or beliefs regarding their sex-
17
ual orientation. Even if these perceptions are incor-
18
rect, the identity imputed by others forms the basis
19
of discrimination.
20
(13) Numerous provisions of Federal law ex-
21
pressly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex,
22
and Federal courts and agencies have correctly in-
23
terpreted these prohibitions on sex discrimination to
24
include discrimination based on sexual orientation,
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
7
•S 393 IS
gender identity, and sex stereotypes. In particular,
1
the Supreme Court of the United States correctly
2
held in Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731
3
(2020) that the prohibition on employment discrimi-
4
nation because of sex under title VII of the Civil
5
Rights Act of 1964 inherently includes discrimina-
6
tion because of sexual orientation or transgender
7
status.
8
(14) This Act makes explicit that existing Fed-
9
eral statutes prohibiting sex discrimination in em-
10
ployment
(including
in
access
to
benefits),
11
healthcare, housing, education, credit, and jury serv-
12
ice also prohibit sexual orientation and gender iden-
13
tity discrimination.
14
(15) LGBTQ people often face discrimination
15
when seeking to rent or purchase housing, as well as
16
in every other aspect of obtaining and maintaining
17
housing. LGBTQ people in same-sex relationships
18
are often discriminated against when two names as-
19
sociated with one gender appear on a housing appli-
20
cation, and transgender people often encounter dis-
21
crimination when credit checks or inquiries reveal a
22
former name.
23
(16) National surveys, including a study com-
24
missioned by the Department of Housing and Urban
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
8
•S 393 IS
Development, show that housing discrimination
1
against LGBTQ people is very prevalent. For in-
2
stance, when same-sex couples inquire about housing
3
that is available for rent, they are less likely to re-
4
ceive positive responses from landlords. A national
5
matched-pair testing investigation found that nearly
6
one-half of same-sex couples had encountered ad-
7
verse, differential treatment when seeking elder
8
housing. According to other studies, transgender
9
people have half the homeownership rate of non-
10
transgender people and about 1 in 5 transgender
11
people experience homelessness. Another survey
12
found that 82 percent of gender nonbinary people
13
experiencing homelessness lacked access to shelter.
14
(17) As a result of the absence of explicit prohi-
15
bitions against discrimination on the basis of sexual
16
orientation and gender identity, credit applicants
17
who are LGBTQ, or are perceived to be LGBTQ,
18
have unequal opportunities to establish credit.
19
LGBTQ people can experience being denied a mort-
20
gage, credit card, student loan, or many other types
21
of credit simply because of their sexual orientation
22
or gender identity.
23
(18)
Numerous
studies
demonstrate
that
24
LGBTQ people, especially transgender people and
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
9
•S 393 IS
women, are economically disadvantaged and at a
1
higher risk for poverty compared with other groups
2
of people. For example, the poverty rate for older
3
women in same-sex couples is twice that of older dif-
4
ferent-sex couples.
5
(19) The right to an impartial jury of one’s
6
peers and the reciprocal right to jury service are
7
fundamental to the free and democratic system of
8
justice in the United States and are based in the
9
Bill of Rights. There is, however, an unfortunate
10
and long-documented history in the United States of
11
attorneys discriminating against LGBTQ individ-
12
uals, or those perceived to be LGBTQ, in jury selec-
13
tion. Failure to bar peremptory challenges based on
14
the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender
15
identity of an individual not only erodes a funda-
16
mental right, duty, and obligation of being a citizen
17
of the United States, but also unfairly creates a sec-
18
ond class of citizenship for LGBTQ victims, wit-
19
nesses, plaintiffs, and defendants.
20
(20) Numerous studies document the shortage
21
of qualified and available homes for the approxi-
22
mately 424,000 youth in the child welfare system
23
and the negative outcomes for the many youth who
24
live in group care as opposed to a loving home or
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
10
•S 393 IS
who age out of care without a permanent family
1
placement. Although same-sex couples are 7 times
2
more likely to foster or adopt than their different-
3
sex counterparts, many child-placing agencies refuse
4
to serve same-sex couples and LGBTQ individuals.
5
This has resulted in a reduction of the pool of quali-
6
fied and available homes for youth in the child wel-
7
fare system who need placement on a temporary or
8
permanent basis. It also sends a negative message
9
about LGBTQ people to children and youth in the
10
child welfare system about who is, and who is not,
11
considered fit to be a parent. While the priority
12
should be on providing the supports necessary to
13
keep children with their families, when removal is re-
14
quired, barring discrimination in foster care and
15
adoption will increase the number of homes available
16
to foster children waiting for foster and adoptive
17
families.
18
(21) LGBTQ youth are overrepresented in the
19
foster care system by at least a factor of two and
20
report twice the rate of poor treatment while in care
21
compared
to
their
non-LGBTQ
counterparts.
22
LGBTQ youth in foster care have a higher average
23
number of placements, higher likelihood of living in
24
a group home, and higher rates of hospitalization for
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
17:22 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S393.IS
S393
11
•S 393 IS
emotional reasons and of juvenile justice involvement
1
than their non-LGBTQ peers because of the high
2
level of bias and discrimination that they face and
3
the difficulty of finding affirming foster placements.
4
Further, due to their physical distance from friends
5
and family, traumatic experiences, and potentially
6
unstable living situations, all youth involved with
7
child welfare services are at risk for being targeted
8
by traffickers seeking to exploit children. Barring
9
discrimination in child welfare services will ensure
10
improved treatment and outcomes for LGBTQ foster
11
children.
12
(22) Courts consistently have found that the
13
government has a compelling interest in preventing
14
and remedying discrimination. For example, the Su-
15
preme Court of the United States found there to be
16
a compelling government interest in eliminating sex
17
discrimination in Board of Directors of Rotary
18
International v. Rotary
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on Congress.gov.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.