Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
Calendar No. 192
118TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 1865
[Report No. 118–89]
To direct agencies to be transparent when using automated and augmented
systems to interact with the public or make critical decisions, and for
other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 7, 2023
Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the
following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
AUGUST 22, 2023
Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 27, 2023, by Mr.
PETERS, with an amendment
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
A BILL
To direct agencies to be transparent when using automated
and augmented systems to interact with the public or
make critical decisions, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2
•S 1865 RS
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
1
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparent Auto-
2
mated Governance Act’’ or the ‘‘TAG Act’’.
3
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
4
In this Act:
5
(1)
AGENCY.—The
term
‘‘agency’’
has
the
6
meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44,
7
United States Code.
8
(2)
AUGMENTED
CRITICAL
DECISION
PROC-
9
ESS.—The term ‘‘augmented critical decision proc-
10
ess’’ means the use by an agency, or by a third
11
party on behalf of the agency, of an automated sys-
12
tem to determine or substantially influence the out-
13
comes of critical decisions.
14
(3) AUTOMATED
SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘auto-
15
mated system’’—
16
(A) means a set of computational processes
17
derived from statistics or artificial intelligence
18
techniques, or that otherwise rely on data about
19
specific individuals or groups, to substantially
20
influence the outcome of critical decisions, in-
21
cluding
computational
processes
that
stand
22
alone or are embedded within another process,
23
system, or application, including paper-based
24
processes; and
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3
•S 1865 RS
(B) does not include computational proc-
1
esses or infrastructure the function of which is
2
not directly related to influencing or deter-
3
mining the outcome of critical decisions.
4
(4) CRITICAL
DECISION.—The term ‘‘critical
5
decision’’ means an agency determination, including
6
the assignment of a score or classification, related to
7
the status, rights, property, or well-being of specific
8
individuals or groups, the outcome of which—
9
(A) is likely to meaningfully differ from
10
one individual or group to another; and
11
(B) meaningfully affects access to, or the
12
cost, terms, or availability of—
13
(i) education and vocational training;
14
(ii) employment;
15
(iii) essential utilities, including elec-
16
tricity, heat, water, and internet;
17
(iv) transportation;
18
(v) any benefits or assistance under
19
any Federal public assistance program or
20
under any State or local public assistance
21
program financed in whole or in part with
22
Federal funds;
23
(vi) financial services, including access
24
to credit or insurance;
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4
•S 1865 RS
(vii) asylum and immigration services;
1
(viii) healthcare;
2
(ix) housing, lodging, or public accom-
3
modations; and
4
(x) any other service, program, or op-
5
portunity
a
determination
about
which
6
would have a legal, material, or significant
7
effect on the life of an individual, as deter-
8
mined by the Director.
9
(5) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means
10
the Director of the Office of Management and Budg-
11
et.
12
(6) PLAIN LANGUAGE.—The term ‘‘plain lan-
13
guage’’ has the meaning given the term in section
14
1311(e)(3)(B) of the Patient Protection and Afford-
15
able Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(e)(3)(B)).
16
(7) TRANSPARENT
AUTOMATED
GOVERNANCE
17
GUIDANCE.—The term ‘‘transparent automated gov-
18
ernance guidance’’ means the guidance issued by the
19
Director pursuant to section 3(a).
20
SEC. 3. TRANSPARENT AUTOMATED GOVERNANCE GUID-
21
ANCE.
22
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the
23
date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall issue
24
guidance that—
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
5
•S 1865 RS
(1) is consistent with relevant legal authorities
1
relating to privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties
2
protections; and
3
(2) requires agencies to provide disclosure and
4
opportunity for appeal when using certain auto-
5
mated systems and augmented critical decision proc-
6
esses.
7
(b) GUIDANCE.—The transparent automated govern-
8
ance guidance issued under subsection (a) shall include—
9
(1) an identification by the Director of any ad-
10
ditional services, programs, or opportunities relating
11
to critical decisions described in section 2(4)(B)(x),
12
if appropriate, for use by agencies with respect to
13
the requirements under this Act;
14
(2) a list of automated systems that may be
15
used in augmented critical decision processes, that,
16
as determined by the Director, are not subject to the
17
requirements of this Act;
18
(3) with respect to automated systems that con-
19
tribute to augmented critical decision processes and
20
interact with the public, guidance for how agencies
21
shall design, develop, or update those automated sys-
22
tems to provide plain language notice to individuals
23
not later than the time and at the place of inter-
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
6
•S 1865 RS
action with such an automated system that they are
1
interacting with such an automated system;
2
(4) the proper contents of the notice described
3
in paragraph (3);
4
(5) examples of what the notice described in
5
paragraph (3) could look like in practice;
6
(6) with respect to augmented critical decision
7
processes, guidance for how agencies shall provide
8
plain language notice to individuals not later than
9
the time a critical decision is issued to an individual
10
that a critical decision concerning the individual was
11
made using an augmented critical decision process;
12
(7) the proper contents of the notice described
13
in paragraph (6);
14
(8) examples of what the notice described in
15
paragraph (6) could look like in practice;
16
(9) guidance for how agencies shall establish an
17
appeals process for critical decisions made by an
18
augmented critical decision process in which an indi-
19
vidual is harmed as a direct result of the use of an
20
automated system in the augmented critical decision
21
process;
22
(10) with respect to critical decisions made by
23
an augmented critical decision process, guidance for
24
how agencies should provide individuals with the op-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
7
•S 1865 RS
portunity for an alternative review, as appropriate,
1
by an individual working for or on behalf of the
2
agency with respect to the critical decision, inde-
3
pendent of the augmented critical decision process;
4
and
5
(11) criteria for information that each agency is
6
required to track and collect relating to issues that
7
arise during the use of augmented critical decision
8
processes—
9
(A) to ensure that the information col-
10
lected can be used to determine whether each
11
automated system and augmented critical deci-
12
sion process covered by this Act is accurate, re-
13
liable, and, to the greatest extent practicable,
14
explainable; and
15
(B) that the agency shall make accessible
16
for use by the agency, the Comptroller General
17
of the United States, and Congress.
18
(c) CONSULTATION.—In developing the transparent
19
automated governance guidance, the Director shall solicit
20
input from experts from—
21
(1) other agencies, including the National Insti-
22
tute for Science and Technology, the Office of
23
Science and Technology Policy, and the Government
24
Accountability Office;
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
8
•S 1865 RS
(2) academia;
1
(3) the private sector; and
2
(4) the nonprofit sector, including experts in
3
civil rights and civil liberties.
4
(d)
ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE
GUIDANCE.—The
5
guidance required by section 104 of the AI in Government
6
Act of 2020 (40 U.S.C. 11301 note) may be used to sat-
7
isfy the requirement for the transparent automated gov-
8
ernance guidance with respect to relevant automated sys-
9
tems and augmented critical decision processes, or a sub-
10
set thereof, if such guidance addresses each requirement
11
under subsection (b) of this section with respect to the
12
automated system or augmented critical decision process.
13
(e) UPDATES.—Not later than 2 years after the date
14
on which the Director issues the transparent automated
15
governance guidance, and biennially thereafter, the Direc-
16
tor shall issue updates to the guidance.
17
SEC. 4. AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION.
18
(a) AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION
OF TRANSPARENT
19
AUTOMATED GOVERNANCE GUIDANCE.—Not later than
20
270 days after the date on which the Director issues the
21
transparent automated governance guidance, the head of
22
each agency shall implement the transparent automated
23
governance guidance to the extent that implementation
24
does not require rulemaking.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6401
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
9
•S 1865 RS
(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later
1
than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and
2
biannually thereafter, the Comptroller General of the
3
United States shall review agency compliance with this Act
4
and submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and
5
Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee
6
on Oversight and Accountability of the House of Rep-
7
resentatives a report with findings and recommendations.
8
SEC. 5. SUNSET.
9
Beginning on the date that is 10 years after the date
10
of enactment of this Act, this Act shall have no force or
11
effect.
12
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
13
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparent Automated
14
Governance Act’’ or the ‘‘TAG Act’’.
15
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
16
In this Act:
17
(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the mean-
18
ing given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United
19
States Code.
20
(2) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.—The term ‘‘arti-
21
ficial intelligence’’ has the meaning given the term in
22
section 238(g) of the John S. McCain National De-
23
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10
24
U.S.C. note prec. 4061; Public Law 115–232).
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
10
•S 1865 RS
(3) AUGMENTED CRITICAL DECISION PROCESS.—
1
The term ‘‘augmented critical decision process’’ means
2
the use by an agency, or by a third party on behalf
3
of the agency, of an automated system to determine
4
or substantially influence the outcomes of critical de-
5
cisions.
6
(4) AUTOMATED SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘automated
7
system’’—
8
(A) means a set of computational processes
9
derived from statistics or artificial intelligence
10
techniques, or that otherwise rely on data about
11
specific individuals or groups, to substantially
12
influence the outcome of critical decisions, in-
13
cluding computational processes that stand alone
14
or are embedded within another process, system,
15
or application, including paper-based processes;
16
and
17
(B) does not include computational proc-
18
esses or infrastructure the function of which is
19
not directly related to influencing or determining
20
the outcome of critical decisions.
21
(5) CRITICAL DECISION.—The term ‘‘critical de-
22
cision’’ means an agency determination, including the
23
assignment of a score or classification, related to the
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
11
•S 1865 RS
status, rights, property, or wellbeing of specific indi-
1
viduals or groups, the outcome of which—
2
(A) is likely to meaningfully differ from one
3
individual or group to another; and
4
(B) meaningfully affects access to, or the
5
cost, terms, or availability of—
6
(i) education and vocational training;
7
(ii) employment;
8
(iii) essential utilities, including elec-
9
tricity, heat, water, and internet;
10
(iv) transportation;
11
(v) any benefits or assistance under
12
any Federal public assistance program or
13
under any State or local public assistance
14
program financed in whole or in part with
15
Federal funds;
16
(vi) financial services, including access
17
to credit or insurance;
18
(vii) asylum and immigration services;
19
(viii) healthcare;
20
(ix) housing, lodging, or public accom-
21
modations; and
22
(x) any other service, program, or op-
23
portunity a determination about which
24
would have a legal, material, or significant
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6203
E:\BILLS\S1865.RS
S1865
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
12
•S 1865 RS
effect on the life of an individual, as deter-
1
mined by the Director.
2
(6) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means the
3
Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
4
(7) PLAIN
LANGUAGE.—The term ‘‘plain lan-
5
guage’’ has the meaning given the term in section
6
1311(e)(3)(B) of the Patient Protection and Afford-
7
able Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(e)(3)(B)).
8
(8) TRANSPARENT
AUTOMATED
GOVERNANCE
9
GUIDANCE.—The term ‘‘transparent automated gov-
10
ernance guidance’’ means the guidance issued by the
11
Director pursuant to section 3(a).
12
SEC. 3. TRANSPARENT AUTOMATED GOVERNANCE GUID-
13
ANCE.
14
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the
15
date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall issue guid-
16
ance that—
17
(1) is consistent with relevant legal authorities
18
relating to privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties
19
protections; and
20
(2) requires agencies to provide disclosure and
21
opportunity for appe
[Text truncated for display. Full text available on Congress.gov.]
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.