Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
118TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 3353
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to amend provisions relating
to franchise term and termination and provisions relating to the elimi-
nation or modification of requirements in franchises, and for other pur-
poses.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 15, 2023
Mr. WEBER of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to amend provi-
sions relating to franchise term and termination and
provisions relating to the elimination or modification of
requirements in franchises, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cable Transparency
4
Act’’.
5
SEC. 2. CABLE FRANCHISE TERM AND TERMINATION.
6
(a) ELIMINATION OR MODIFICATION OF REQUIRE-
7
MENT IN FRANCHISE.—Section 625 of the Communica-
8
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 3353 IH
tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 545) is amended to read
1
as follows:
2
‘‘SEC. 625. ELIMINATION OR MODIFICATION OF REQUIRE-
3
MENT IN FRANCHISE.
4
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—During the period in which a
5
franchise is in effect, the cable operator may obtain the
6
elimination or modification of any requirement in the fran-
7
chise by submitting to the franchising authority a request
8
for the elimination or modification of such requirement.
9
‘‘(b) ELIMINATION OR MODIFICATION OF REQUIRE-
10
MENT IN FRANCHISE.—
11
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The franchising author-
12
ity shall eliminate or modify a requirement in ac-
13
cordance with a complete request submitted under
14
subsection (a) not later than 120 days after receiv-
15
ing such request if the cable operator demonstrates
16
in the request—
17
‘‘(A) good cause for the elimination or
18
modification of the requirement, including the
19
need to eliminate or modify the requirement—
20
‘‘(i) to conform to an applicable Fed-
21
eral or State law;
22
‘‘(ii) to address changes in technology;
23
or
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 3353 IH
‘‘(iii) in the case of a requirement ap-
1
plicable to the cable operator, due to com-
2
mercial impracticability; and
3
‘‘(B) that the mix, quality, and level of
4
cable services required by the franchise at the
5
time the franchise was granted will be main-
6
tained notwithstanding the elimination or modi-
7
fication of the requirement;
8
‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term
9
‘commercial impracticability’ means that it is com-
10
mercially impracticable for the operator to comply
11
with the requirement as a result of a change in con-
12
ditions which is beyond the control of the operator
13
and the nonoccurrence of which was a basic assump-
14
tion on which the requirement was based.
15
‘‘(c) DEEMED ELIMINATION
OR MODIFICATION.—
16
Except in the case of a request for the elimination or
17
modification of a requirement for services relating to pub-
18
lic, educational, or governmental access, if the franchising
19
authority fails to approve or deny the complete request
20
submitted under subsection (a) by the date described
21
under subsection (b), the requirement shall be deemed
22
eliminated or modified in accordance with the request on
23
the day after such date.
24
‘‘(d) APPEAL.—
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 3353 IH
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any cable operator whose
1
request for elimination or modification of a require-
2
ment in a franchise under subsection (a) has been
3
denied by a final decision of a franchising authority
4
may seek judicial review of the decision pursuant to
5
the provisions of section 635.
6
‘‘(2) GRANT OF REQUEST.—In the case of any
7
proposed elimination or modification of a require-
8
ment in a franchise under subsection (a), the court
9
shall grant such elimination or modification only if
10
the cable operator demonstrates to the court that
11
the standards in subsection (b) have been met.
12
‘‘(e) WHEN REQUEST CONSIDERED COMPLETE.—
13
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of this
14
section, a request to a franchising authority shall be
15
considered complete if the cable operator—
16
‘‘(A) has taken the first procedural step
17
within the control of the cable operator that the
18
franchising authority requires as part of the
19
process established by the franchising authority
20
for reviewing any requests related to franchises;
21
and
22
‘‘(B) has not received a written notice from
23
the franchising authority within 30 days after
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
5
•HR 3353 IH
the date on which the request is received by the
1
franchising authority—
2
‘‘(i) stating that all the information
3
(including any form or other document) re-
4
quired by the franchising authority to be
5
submitted for the request to be considered
6
complete has not been submitted;
7
‘‘(ii) identifying the information re-
8
quired to be submitted that was not sub-
9
mitted; and
10
‘‘(iii) identifying the publicly available
11
rules, regulations, or standards issued by
12
the franchising authority requiring that
13
the information be submitted with such a
14
request.
15
‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term
16
‘the date on which the request is received by the
17
franchising authority’ means—
18
‘‘(A) in the case of a request submitted
19
electronically, the date on which the request is
20
transmitted;
21
‘‘(B) in the case of a request submitted in
22
person, the date on which the request is deliv-
23
ered to the individual or at the location speci-
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
6
•HR 3353 IH
fied by the franchising authority for in-person
1
submission; and
2
‘‘(C) in the case of a request submitted in
3
any other manner, the date determined under
4
regulations promulgated by the Commission for
5
the manner in which the request is submitted.’’.
6
(b) IN GENERAL.—Section 626 of the Communica-
7
tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 546) is amended to read
8
as follows:
9
‘‘SEC. 626. FRANCHISE TERM AND TERMINATION.
10
‘‘(a) FRANCHISE TERM.—A franchise shall continue
11
in effect (without any requirement for renewal) until the
12
date on which the franchise is revoked or terminated in
13
accordance with subsection (b).
14
‘‘(b) LIMITS.—
15
‘‘(1) PROHIBITION AGAINST REVOCATION; TER-
16
MINATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), a
17
franchise may not be—
18
‘‘(A) revoked by a franchising authority;
19
‘‘(B) terminated by a cable operator; or
20
‘‘(C) revoked or terminated by operation of
21
law, including by a term in a franchise that re-
22
vokes or terminates such franchise on a specific
23
date, after a period of time, or upon the occur-
24
rence of an event.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
7
•HR 3353 IH
‘‘(2) WHEN TERMINATION OR REVOCATION OF
1
FRANCHISE PERMITTED.—
2
‘‘(A) TERMINATION
BY
CABLE
OPER-
3
ATOR.—
4
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A cable operator
5
may terminate a franchise by submitting
6
to the franchising authority a written re-
7
quest for the franchising authority to re-
8
voke such franchise.
9
‘‘(ii) TIME
OF
REVOCATION.—If the
10
cable operator submits a complete request
11
under clause (i), the franchising authority
12
shall revoke the franchise on the date that
13
is 90 days after the franchising authority
14
receives such request.
15
‘‘(iii) DEEMED TO BE REVOKED.—If a
16
franchising authority does not approve a
17
request by the date required under clause
18
(ii), the franchise is deemed revoked on the
19
day after such date.
20
‘‘(B) TERMINATION BY FRANCHISING AU-
21
THORITY.—A franchising authority may revoke
22
a franchise if the franchising authority—
23
‘‘(i) finds that the cable operator has
24
knowingly and willfully failed to substan-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
8
•HR 3353 IH
tially meet a material requirement imposed
1
by the franchise;
2
‘‘(ii) provides the cable operator a rea-
3
sonable opportunity to cure such failure,
4
after which the cable operator fails to cure
5
such failure; and
6
‘‘(iii) does not waive the material re-
7
quirement or acquiesce with the failure to
8
substantially meet such requirement.
9
‘‘(c) REVIEW OF REVOCATION OF FRANCHISE BY
10
FRANCHISING AUTHORITY.—
11
‘‘(1) ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL REVIEW.—
12
With respect to a determination by a franchising au-
13
thority to revoke a franchise under subsection
14
(b)(2)(B), a cable operator may—
15
‘‘(A) petition the Commission for review of
16
such determination; or
17
‘‘(B) seek judicial review of such deter-
18
mination pursuant to the provisions of 635.
19
‘‘(2) COMMISSION REVIEW.—With respect to a
20
petition for the review of a determination brought
21
under paragraph (1)(A), the Commission shall—
22
‘‘(A) review the determination de novo; and
23
‘‘(B) invalidate the determination if, based
24
on the evidence presented during the review, the
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
9
•HR 3353 IH
Commission determines that the franchising au-
1
thority has not demonstrated by a preponder-
2
ance of the evidence that the franchising au-
3
thority revoked the franchise in accordance with
4
subsection (b)(2)(B).
5
‘‘(3) STAY
OF
DETERMINATION
TO
REVOKE
6
FRANCHISE.—A revocation of a franchise under sub-
7
section (b)(2)(B) may be stayed—
8
‘‘(A) in the case the cable operator peti-
9
tions the Commission for review of the deter-
10
mination on which such revocation is based, by
11
the Commission; and
12
‘‘(B) in the case the cable operator seeks
13
judicial review of the determination on which
14
such revocation is based, by the court in which
15
the cable operator seeks judicial review of the
16
determination.’’.
17
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
18
The Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.)
19
is amended—
20
(1) in section 601—
21
(A) in paragraph (4), by striking the semi-
22
colon at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’;
23
(B) by striking paragraph (5); and
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
10
•HR 3353 IH
(C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as
1
paragraph (5);
2
(2) in section 602(9)—
3
(A) by striking ‘‘initial’’; and
4
(B) by striking ‘‘, or renewal thereof (in-
5
cluding a renewal of an authorization which has
6
been granted subject to section 626),’’;
7
(3) in section 611(b), by striking ‘‘and may re-
8
quire as part of a cable operator’s proposal for a
9
franchise renewal, subject to section 626’’;
10
(4) in section 612(b)(3)—
11
(A) by striking ‘‘or as part of a proposal
12
for renewal, subject to section 626,’’; and
13
(B) by striking ‘‘, or proposal for renewal
14
thereof,’’;
15
(5) in section 621(b)(3)—
16
(A) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking
17
‘‘or franchise renewal’’; and
18
(B) in subparagraph (D)—
19
(i) by striking ‘‘initial’’; and
20
(ii) by striking ‘‘, a franchise re-
21
newal,’’;
22
(6) in section 624—
23
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
11
•HR 3353 IH
(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘(in-
1
cluding requests for renewal proposals, subject
2
to section 626)’’; and
3
(B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘or
4
renewal thereof’’;
5
(7) in section 635A(a), by striking ‘‘renewal,’’.
6
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION.—
7
(1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section, and the
8
amendments made by this section, shall take effect
9
6 months after the date of the enactment of this
10
Act.
11
(2)
APPLICATION.—This
section,
and
the
12
amendments made by this section, shall apply to a
13
franchise granted—
14
(A) on or after the effective date estab-
15
lished by paragraph (1); or
16
(B) before such date, if—
17
(i) such franchise (including, any re-
18
newal thereof before the date of the enact-
19
ment of this Act) is in effect on such date;
20
or
21
(ii) such franchise is expired and the
22
cable operator has continued to perform
23
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
12
•HR 3353 IH
under the provisions of such franchise as if
1
such franchise were not expired.
2
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
02:06 May 30, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H3353.IH
H3353
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.