Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
118TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 1522
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study
on the designation of biosimilar biological products as interchangeable.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MAY 10, 2023
Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
A BILL
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services
to conduct a study on the designation of biosimilar bio-
logical products as interchangeable.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. STUDY ON THE SUBSTITUTION OF INTER-
3
CHANGEABLE BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS.
4
(a) REPORT ON BIOSIMILAR BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT
5
INTERCHANGEABILITY.—Not later than 4 years after the
6
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and
7
Human Services (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Sec-
8
retary’’), acting through the Commissioner of Food and
9
Drugs, shall submit to the Committee on Health, Edu-
10
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:59 May 19, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S1522.IS
S1522
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2
•S 1522 IS
cation, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Com-
1
mittee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Rep-
2
resentatives a report on the designation of biosimilar bio-
3
logical products as interchangeable, under section
4
351(k)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
5
262(k)(4)). Such report shall—
6
(1) describe any challenges faced by manufac-
7
turers in developing and obtaining approval under
8
section 351(k) of such Act for biosimilar biological
9
products that receive such interchangeability des-
10
ignation;
11
(2) summarize the experience of the Food and
12
Drug Administration in reviewing applications for
13
biosimilar biological products that seek an inter-
14
changeability designation, including compared to ap-
15
plications for biosimilar biological products under
16
such section 351(k) that do not seek such designa-
17
tion;
18
(3) summarize, at a high level, the data and in-
19
formation that the Food and Drug Administration
20
has reviewed to support applications for interchange-
21
ability under section 351(k)(4) of such Act, includ-
22
ing data from switching studies, and the differences
23
between the findings from such data and informa-
24
tion compared to the data and information that the
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:59 May 19, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S1522.IS
S1522
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3
•S 1522 IS
Food and Drug Administration has reviewed for bio-
1
similar biological products that have not received a
2
designation of interchangeability;
3
(4) describe the existing authority of the Food
4
and Drug Administration to determine, on a case-
5
by-case basis, the evidence needed to support an
6
interchangeability designation, and how the Food
7
and Drug Administration has used such authority,
8
including the factors that the agency may consider
9
when making those judgements;
10
(5) describe how the Food and Drug Adminis-
11
tration has considered real-world evidence or other
12
data and information, including from use of the bio-
13
logical product in other countries, in determining
14
whether a biosimilar biological product meets the
15
criteria for the interchangeability designation;
16
(6) describe the differences between the regu-
17
latory and scientific considerations for determining a
18
biological product to be interchangeable under sec-
19
tion 351(k)(4) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 262(k)(4))
20
and the system for assigning therapeutic equivalence
21
ratings to drugs approved under section 505 of the
22
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
23
355); and
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:59 May 19, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S1522.IS
S1522
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4
•S 1522 IS
(7) assess the uptake of biosimilar biological
1
products, and the impact of the efforts of the Food
2
and Drug Administration to improve adoption of
3
biosimilar biological products through multimedia
4
education and curriculum materials.
5
(b) STAKEHOLDER INPUT.—For purposes of devel-
6
oping the report described in subsection (a), the Secretary
7
may convene workshops or listening sessions, establish
8
dockets to receive public comment, or use other means to
9
obtain input from interested stakeholders.
10
(c) INFORMATION DISCLOSURE.—Nothing in this
11
section shall be construed to authorize the disclosure of
12
information that is prohibited from disclosure under sec-
13
tion 301(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
14
(21 U.S.C. 331(j)) or section 1905 of title 18, United
15
States Code, or subject to withholding under paragraph
16
(4) of section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code (com-
17
monly referred to as the ‘‘Freedom of Information Act’’).
18
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:59 May 19, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\S1522.IS
S1522
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS