Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
118TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 2894
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to launch a nuclear weapon using
an autonomous weapons system that is not subject to meaningful human
control, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 26, 2023
Mr. LIEU (for himself, Mr. BUCK, and Mr. BEYER) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in ad-
dition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subse-
quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to launch a nuclear
weapon using an autonomous weapons system that is
not subject to meaningful human control, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Block Nuclear Launch
4
by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act of 2023’’.
5
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
6
Congress finds the following:
7
VerDate Sep 11 2014
05:22 May 05, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2894.IH
H2894
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 2894 IH
(1) Department of Defense Directive 3000.09
1
defines ‘‘autonomous weapons system’’ as a weapons
2
system that, once activated, can select and engage
3
targets without further intervention by an operator.
4
(2) Article 3, clause 8 of the United Nations
5
Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons pro-
6
hibits the indiscriminate use of weapons, which is
7
defined as ‘‘any placement of such weapons . . .
8
which may be expected to cause incidental loss of ci-
9
vilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian ob-
10
jects, or a combination thereof, which would be ex-
11
cessive in relation to the concrete and direct military
12
advantage anticipated’’.
13
(3) Section 5.10 of the Department of Defense
14
Law of War Manual states ‘‘[c]ommanders, at all
15
levels, have a great responsibility to exercise the
16
leadership necessary to reduce the risk of harm to
17
civilians and civilian objects’’.
18
(4) In a report on autonomous weapons systems
19
published on December 1, 2021, Human Rights
20
Watch and the International Human Rights Clinic
21
of Harvard Law School argue that ‘‘[r]obots lack
22
the compassion, empathy, mercy, and judgment nec-
23
essary to treat humans humanely, and they cannot
24
understand the inherent worth of human life’’.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
05:22 May 05, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2894.IH
H2894
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 2894 IH
(5) The 2022 Nuclear Posture Review states
1
‘‘[i]n all cases, the United States will maintain a
2
human ‘in the loop’ for all actions critical to inform-
3
ing and executing decisions by the President to ini-
4
tiate and terminate nuclear weapon employment’’.
5
(6) The National Security Commission on Arti-
6
ficial Intelligence, established by Congress pursuant
7
to section 1051 of the National Defense Authoriza-
8
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–
9
232), recommends that the United States ‘‘clearly
10
and publicly affirm existing U.S. policy that only
11
human beings can authorize employment of nuclear
12
weapons and seek similar commitments from Russia
13
and China’’.
14
(7) On February 16, 2023, the Department of
15
State issued a Political Declaration on Responsible
16
Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy,
17
which includes the following statement: ‘‘States
18
should maintain human control and involvement for
19
all actions critical to informing and executing sov-
20
ereign decisions concerning nuclear weapons’’.
21
(8) Large-scale nuclear war would lead to the
22
deaths of millions of people, firestorms, radioactive
23
fallout contamination, agricultural failure, and cata-
24
strophic climate results.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
05:22 May 05, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2894.IH
H2894
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 2894 IH
(9) To comply with international humanitarian
1
law, human control and human legal judgment are
2
essential in the nuclear command and control proc-
3
ess.
4
SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
5
It is the sense of Congress that—
6
(1) the use of lethal, autonomous nuclear weap-
7
ons systems that are not subject to meaningful
8
human control cannot properly adhere to inter-
9
national humanitarian law; and
10
(2) any decision to launch any nuclear weapon
11
should not be made by artificial intelligence.
12
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO DE-
13
PLOY NUCLEAR WEAPONS WITH AUTONO-
14
MOUS WEAPONS SYSTEMS NOT SUBJECT TO
15
MEANINGFUL HUMAN CONTROL.
16
(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to
17
be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal
18
year may be obligated or expended to use an autonomous
19
weapons system that is not subject to meaningful human
20
control to—
21
(1) launch a nuclear weapon; or
22
(2) select or engage targets for the purposes of
23
launching a nuclear weapon.
24
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
05:22 May 05, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2894.IH
H2894
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
5
•HR 2894 IH
(1) The term ‘‘autonomous weapons system’’
1
has the meaning given such term in Department of
2
Defense Directive 3000.09, titled ‘‘Autonomy in
3
Weapons Systems’’ as in effect on the date of the
4
enactment of this Act.
5
(2) The term ‘‘meaningful human control’’
6
means, with respect to an autonomous weapons sys-
7
tem, human control of—
8
(A) the selection and engagement of tar-
9
gets; and
10
(B) the time, location, and manner of use.
11
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
05:22 May 05, 2023
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2894.IH
H2894
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS