Federal
Opposing any inclusion of apparel, textile, and footwear products in the Generalized System of Preferences.
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,108 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
IV
116TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. RES. 1178
Opposing any inclusion of apparel, textile, and footwear products in the
Generalized System of Preferences.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
OCTOBER 2, 2020
Mr. SIRES (for himself, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. ESPAILLAT, and Ms. BASS)
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee
on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Af-
fairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each
case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of
the committee concerned
RESOLUTION
Opposing any inclusion of apparel, textile, and footwear
products in the Generalized System of Preferences.
Whereas the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) was
authorized by title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19
U.S.C. 2461 et seq.) to promote economic growth in de-
veloping countries and, from January 1, 1976, has pro-
vided duty-free treatment to goods of designated bene-
ficiary countries;
Whereas the 115th Congress most recently reauthorized the
GSP program until December 31, 2020;
Whereas GSP was carefully designed to exclude import-sen-
sitive industries, such as textiles and apparel, to ensure
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:05 Oct 03, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1178.IH
HR1178
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2
•HRES 1178 IH
that domestic producers and component suppliers would
not be harmed;
Whereas certain industry groups have proposed expanding
GSP-eligible products to include textile, apparel, and
footwear products;
Whereas in a joint letter sent to the Committee on Ways and
Means of the House of Representatives on November 27,
2019, the governments of Colombia, Costa Rica, the Do-
minican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Hon-
duras warned that expanding GSP to include textile, ap-
parel, and footwear products would lead to massive lay-
offs in these sectors, which provide 2,000,000 direct jobs
in Latin America;
Whereas the United States trade in goods and services with
the Western Hemisphere totaled $1,900,000,000,000 in
2018;
Whereas according to the Department of Commerce, United
States exports of goods and services to the Western
Hemisphere supported an estimated 3,800,000 jobs in
2015;
Whereas according to data from the Office of Textiles and
Apparel, the Western Hemisphere trade in textile and ap-
parel products directly supports nearly 70 percent of
United
States
textile
and
apparel
exports
and
$35,000,000,000 in two-way trade;
Whereas United States trade relations with other countries in
the Western Hemisphere not only advance United States
economic interests, but also advance prosperity, security,
and economic opportunity in these countries, reducing the
root causes of irregular migration and minimizing the
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:05 Oct 03, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1178.IH
HR1178
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3
•HRES 1178 IH
conditions of poverty and unemployment that can enable
drug-trafficking and other illegal economic activity;
Whereas United States trade agreements such as the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the Dominican Repub-
lic-Central America Free Trade Agreement, and the
United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement in-
clude clear standards for labor and environmental rights
and rules of origin;
Whereas GSP does not include any standards for environ-
mental protection under its eligibility criteria for bene-
ficiary developing countries;
Whereas while Haiti is also a beneficiary under GSP, its tex-
tile industry is heavily dependent on exports to the
United States under the Caribbean Basin Trade Partner-
ship Act (CBTPA) and the Haitian Hemispheric Oppor-
tunity through Partnership Encouragement Act;
Whereas adding textile and apparel to GSP would diminish
the preferences Haiti receives under the CBTPA;
Whereas China, while not GSP-eligible, would indirectly ben-
efit from a GSP expansion because it is a major supplier
of textile and apparel component parts to numerous bene-
ficiary countries under GSP, with 36 percent of China’s
global textile exports being shipped currently to GSP na-
tions;
Whereas the United States has a strong interest in sup-
porting trade and investment with sub-Saharan Africa
beyond the African Growth and Opportunity Act
(AGOA), which is scheduled to terminate in 2025;
Whereas AGOA has provided duty-free treatment for essen-
tially all goods from eligible sub-Saharan African coun-
tries with the goal of leveraging expanded trade and in-
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:05 Oct 03, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1178.IH
HR1178
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
4
•HRES 1178 IH
vestment to promote economic development and poverty
alleviation across the continent while strengthening
United States-Africa economic ties;
Whereas AGOA’s apparel imports from sub-Saharan Africa
have
risen
from
$355,000,000
in
2000,
to
$1,400,000,000 in 2019, generating an estimated
1,300,000 new garment jobs in Africa, yet still rep-
resenting less than 2 percent of global United States ap-
parel imports of $83,800,000,000 in 2019;
Whereas key apparel producers currently receiving GSP bene-
fits already export more apparel to the United States in-
dividually than all apparel exporters in the 38 AGOA-eli-
gible countries combined, including—
(1) $4,400,000,000 from Indonesia;
(2) $2,700,000,000 from Cambodia; and
(3) $1,500,000,000 from Pakistan;
Whereas members of the African Diplomatic Corps, on Sep-
tember 9, 2020, requested that the House of Representa-
tives Subcommittee on Trade seriously consider the ‘‘dev-
astating impact to Africa’’ if the GSP program were ex-
panded to include duty-free treatment for apparel; and
Whereas similar concerns about the inclusion of garments
and textiles in GSP were registered by the Government
of Ghana, the African Cotton and Textile Industry Fed-
eration, and members of the United States bipartisan
AGOA coalition: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
1
(1) reiterates its support for preserving West-
2
ern Hemisphere supply chains, recognizing that
3
these supply chains have provided economic benefits
4
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:52 Oct 22, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR1178.IH
HR1178
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
5
•HRES 1178 IH
for the United States and its partners, while fos-
1
tering efforts to improve labor and environmental
2
standards in the hemisphere;
3
(2) recognizes that inclusion of apparel, textiles,
4
and footwear in the Generalized System of Pref-
5
erences program would be detrimental to imports to
6
the United States receiving preferential treatment
7
under the African Growth and Opportunity Act
8
(AGOA) and to jobs that depend on AGOA trade in
9
Africa; and
10
(3) supports a reauthorization of the General-
11
ized System of Preferences, but opposes any inclu-
12
sion of apparel, textile, and footwear products in the
13
Generalized System of Preferences.
14
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:05 Oct 03, 2020
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR1178.IH
HR1178
pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.