Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
116TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. R. 6991
To prohibit actions to terminate or withdraw the United States from inter-
national treaties without affirmative approval from both Houses of Con-
gress, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 22, 2020
Mr. PANETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs
A BILL
To prohibit actions to terminate or withdraw the United
States from international treaties without affirmative ap-
proval from both Houses of Congress, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Actions
4
Undermining Security without Endorsement Act’’ or the
5
‘‘PAUSE Act’’.
6
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
7
Congress makes the following findings:
8
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 6991 IH
(1) The COVID–19 global pandemic has high-
1
lighted the need for United States leadership to ad-
2
dress the full range of international security chal-
3
lenges, which the Government of the United States
4
can do by reaffirming its steadfast commitment to
5
those mutually beneficial treaties and agreements
6
forged with its European and Indo-Pacific allies,
7
along with other states parties.
8
(2) For more than 70 years, the United States
9
has shown a bipartisan commitment to the North
10
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), specifically to
11
the principle of collective defense enshrined in Arti-
12
cle 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Wash-
13
ington April 4, 1949.
14
(3) Section 1242 of the National Defense Au-
15
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law
16
116–92) prohibited the use of funds for the United
17
States withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty in
18
recognition that the NATO alliance remains a cor-
19
nerstone for peace and prosperity throughout the
20
world.
21
(4) On January 22, 2019, the House of Rep-
22
resentatives passed H.R. 676 (116th Congress) on a
23
357–22 vote, prohibiting the use of funds for the
24
United States withdrawal from the North Atlantic
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 6991 IH
Treaty, and on December 17, 2019, the Committee
1
on Foreign Relations of the Senate reported out S.J.
2
Res. 4 (116th Congress), which if enacted into law,
3
would require approval of two-thirds of the Senate,
4
or both Houses of Congress, before the President
5
could withdraw the United States from the treaty.
6
(5) The Treaty on Open Skies, signed at Hel-
7
sinki March 24, 1992, provides a critical confidence-
8
building measure for Euro-Atlantic security to the
9
mutual benefit of the 34 States Parties to the trea-
10
ty, and the Open Skies Consultative Commission
11
(OSCC) is one of the few remaining operational dip-
12
lomatic forums from which the United States can
13
engage with the Russian Federation.
14
(6) Although the Government of the United
15
States is right to diplomatically press the Govern-
16
ment of the Russian Federation to return to full
17
compliance with its obligations under the Treaty on
18
Open Skies, withdrawal or termination of the treaty
19
would deprive United States allies and partners of
20
the benefits derived from observation missions over
21
Russian territory and Russian occupied Eastern
22
Ukraine, missions that have vastly outnumbered
23
Russian overflights of United States territory since
24
entry into force of the treaty.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 6991 IH
(7) The Mutual Defense Treaty Between the
1
United States and the Republic of Korea, signed at
2
Washington October 1, 1953, the ratification of
3
which the Senate advised and consented to on Janu-
4
ary 26, 1954, was born from mutual sacrifice during
5
the Korean War, is based on shared values and in-
6
terests, and remains critical to the national security
7
of the United States nearly 7 decades after its sign-
8
ing.
9
(8) A February 2020 report from the Depart-
10
ment of State confirmed, in part, that verifiable lim-
11
its on ‘‘Russia’s strategic nuclear force’’ under the
12
New START Treaty ‘‘currently contribute to the na-
13
tional security of the United States’’.
14
(9) A decision by the President to allow the
15
New START Treaty to expire on February 5, 2021,
16
without the United States having first successfully
17
concluded a verifiable and binding agreement in its
18
place, would lead to the United States losing visi-
19
bility into the location, movement, and disposition of
20
the strategic arsenal of the Russian Federation to
21
the detriment of the national security of the United
22
States and its allies.
23
(10) The Constitution of the United States pro-
24
vides Congress an important role in the treaty proc-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
5
•HR 6991 IH
ess, requiring the advice and consent of two-thirds
1
of the Senate for approval of a resolution of ratifica-
2
tion.
3
SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
4
It is the sense of Congress that—
5
(1) the President should refrain from taking
6
any action to withdraw or terminate any inter-
7
national treaty to which the Senate has given its ad-
8
vice and consent to ratification without proper con-
9
sultation with, and affirmative approval from, Con-
10
gress;
11
(2) the 1979 Supreme Court decision in Gold-
12
water v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979), is not control-
13
ling legal precedent with respect to the role of Con-
14
gress in the withdrawal or termination of the United
15
States from an international treaty, as the Court di-
16
rected the lower court to dismiss the complaint and
17
did not address the constitutionality of the decision
18
by President Carter to terminate the Mutual De-
19
fense Treaty between the United States of America
20
and the Republic of China, signed at Washington
21
December 2, 1954 (commonly referred to as the
22
‘‘Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty’’); and
23
(3) the United States should take every action
24
to reinforce its global reputation as a country that
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
6
•HR 6991 IH
fully complies with its obligations under the inter-
1
national treaties to which it is a party.
2
SEC. 4. AFFIRMATIVE CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FOR
3
TERMINATION OR WITHDRAWAL FROM AN
4
INTERNATIONAL TREATY.
5
No action to terminate or withdraw the United States
6
from any international treaty to which the Senate has
7
given its advice and consent to ratification may occur un-
8
less—
9
(1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
10
of State meet the requirements under section 5; and
11
(2) there is enacted into law a joint resolution
12
that approves such action.
13
SEC. 5. JUSTIFICATION, CERTIFICATIONS, DETERMINA-
14
TION, AND STRATEGY ON ACTIONS TO TERMI-
15
NATE OR WITHDRAW THE UNITED STATES
16
FROM AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY.
17
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days before
18
the provision of notice of intent to terminate or withdraw
19
the United States from any international treaty to which
20
the Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification,
21
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, in
22
consultation with the Director of National Intelligence,
23
shall each submit to the appropriate committees of Con-
24
gress—
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
7
•HR 6991 IH
(1) a detailed justification for the withdrawal
1
from or termination of the treaty;
2
(2) if the justification described in paragraph
3
(1) includes that a state party to the treaty is in
4
material breach of one or more obligations under the
5
treaty, a detailed explanation of the steps taken by
6
that state party to return to compliance with such
7
obligations;
8
(3) a certification that all other state parties to
9
the treaty have been consulted with respect to the
10
justification described in paragraph (1);
11
(4) a certification that withdrawal from or ter-
12
mination of the treaty would be in the best national
13
interests of the United States;
14
(5) a certification that the United States ra-
15
tionale and all steps taken for withdrawal from the
16
treaty are made in compliance with the treaty; and
17
(6) a comprehensive strategy to mitigate
18
against lost capacity of benefits, including a super-
19
seding treaty or potential new bilateral or multilat-
20
eral confidence-building measures.
21
(b) FORM.—The submission required by subsection
22
(a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in-
23
clude a classified annex.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
8
•HR 6991 IH
(c) APPLICABILITY TO NEW STRATEGIC ARMS RE-
1
DUCTION TREATY.—This section shall apply to a decision
2
by the President to not renew the New START Treaty
3
for up to an additional 5 years.
4
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
5
In this Act:
6
(1)
APPROPRIATE
COMMITTEES
OF
CON-
7
GRESS.—The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Con-
8
gress’’ means—
9
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and
10
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Sen-
11
ate; and
12
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and
13
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House
14
of Representatives.
15
(2) NEW
START
TREATY.—The term ‘‘New
16
START Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the
17
United States of America and the Russian Federa-
18
tion on Measures for the Further Reduction and
19
Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed at
20
Prague April 8, 2010.
21
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
18:22 Jun 16, 2020
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H6991.IH
H6991
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.