Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 5478
To amend title 35, United States Code, restore patent rights to inventors,
and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
DECEMBER 18, 2019
Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 35, United States Code, restore patent rights
to inventors, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inventor Rights Act’’.
4
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
5
Congress finds the following:
6
(1) Inventors have contributed significantly to
7
innovation in the United States and their continued
8
dedication to inventing and sharing solutions to
9
modern technical challenges is essential for the
10
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•HR 5478 IH
United States to maintain leadership in the global
1
economy.
2
(2) Inventors, not employees or investors, are
3
the source of innovation intended by the Constitu-
4
tion (‘‘securing to inventors’’) and the Patent Act
5
‘‘(Whoever invents or discovers . . . may obtain a
6
patent therefore . . .)’’.
7
(3) Recent changes to patent laws and proce-
8
dures and Supreme Court decisions have adversely
9
affected inventors such that the promise of Article 1,
10
section 8 of the Constitution of ‘‘securing for limited
11
times to inventors the exclusive right to their discov-
12
eries’’ is no longer attainable.
13
(4) Inventors are denied the fundamental right
14
to ‘‘exclude others’’ by the Supreme Court’s 2006
15
decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC.
16
(5) Inventors were stripped of the right to file
17
suit in their own judicial district by the Supreme
18
Court’s 2017 decision in TC Heartland LLC v.
19
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC.
20
(6) Issued patents fail to secure to inventors
21
their exclusive rights because—
22
(A) the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in-
23
stitutes trials in over 60 percent of cases and
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•HR 5478 IH
invalidates one or more claims in over 80 per-
1
cent of trials which reach a final decision;
2
(B) many patents are subjected to multiple
3
post issuance reviews; or
4
(C) most inventors cannot afford the costs
5
of defending a patent challenged in a single
6
post issuance review, as these costs can reach
7
hundreds of thousand of dollars.
8
(7) Infringement trials can cost tens of millions
9
of dollars and can take up to ten years to reach a
10
final judgment after all appeals, making legal relief
11
unattainable for inventors.
12
(8) These obstacles have given rise to an ‘‘effi-
13
cient infringement’’ business model whereby large
14
corporations infringe patent rights held by inventors
15
without concern for any legal consequences.
16
(9) Patent protection has led to patient cures,
17
positive changes to the standard of living for all peo-
18
ple in the United States, and improvements to the
19
agricultural, telecommunications, software, biotech,
20
pharmaceutical and electronics industries, among
21
others.
22
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•HR 5478 IH
SEC. 3. INVENTOR PROTECTIONS.
1
(a) INVENTOR-OWNED PATENT.—Section 100 of title
2
35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
3
the following:
4
‘‘(k) The term ‘inventor-owned patent’ means a pat-
5
ent with respect to which the inventor of the invention
6
claimed by the patent or an entity controlled by that in-
7
ventor—
8
‘‘(1) is the patentee; and
9
‘‘(2) holds all substantial rights.’’.
10
(b) INVENTOR-OWNED
PATENT
PROTECTIONS.—
11
Chapter 32 of title 35, United States Code, is amended
12
by adding at the end the following new section:
13
‘‘§ 330. Inventor protections
14
‘‘(a) PROTECTION
FROM
POST
ISSUANCE
PRO-
15
CEEDINGS IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADE-
16
MARK OFFICE.—The United States Patent and Trade-
17
mark Office shall not undertake a proceeding to reexam-
18
ine, review, or otherwise make a determination about the
19
validity of an inventor-owned patent without the consent
20
of the patentee.
21
‘‘(b) CHOICE OF VENUE.—Any civil action for in-
22
fringement of an inventor-owned patent or any action for
23
a declaratory judgment that an inventor-owned patent is
24
invalid or not infringed may be brought in a judicial dis-
25
trict—
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•HR 5478 IH
‘‘(1) in accordance with section 1400(b) of title
1
28;
2
‘‘(2) where the defendant has agreed or con-
3
sented to be sued in the instant action;
4
‘‘(3) where an inventor named on the patent in
5
suit conducted research or development that led to
6
the application for the patent in suit;
7
‘‘(4) where a party has a regular and estab-
8
lished physical facility that such party controls and
9
operates, not primarily for the purpose of creating
10
venue, and has—
11
‘‘(A) engaged in management of significant
12
research and development of an invention
13
claimed in a patent in suit prior to the effective
14
filing date of the patent;
15
‘‘(B) manufactured a tangible good that is
16
alleged to embody an invention claimed in a
17
patent in suit; or
18
‘‘(C) implemented a manufacturing process
19
for a tangible good in which the process is al-
20
leged to embody an invention claimed in a pat-
21
ent in suit; or
22
‘‘(5) in the case of a foreign defendant that
23
does not meet the requirements of section 1400(b)
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•HR 5478 IH
of title 28, in accordance with section 1391(c)(3) of
1
such title.
2
‘‘(c) INJUNCTION.—
3
‘‘(1) PRESUMPTION.—Upon a finding by a
4
court of infringement of an inventor-owned patent
5
not proven invalid or unenforceable, the court shall
6
presume, respectively, that—
7
‘‘(A) further infringement of the patent
8
would cause irreparable injury; and
9
‘‘(B) remedies available at law are inad-
10
equate to compensate for that injury.
11
‘‘(2) OVERCOMING THE PRESUMPTION.—A pre-
12
sumption described under subparagraphs (A) or (B)
13
of paragraph (1) may be overcome if the infringing
14
party shows clear and convincing evidence that the
15
patentee would not be irreparably harmed by further
16
infringement of the patent, including evidence of un-
17
reasonable delay by the patentee from the date on
18
which the infringement was known or reasonably
19
could have been known to the patentee.
20
‘‘(d) RECOVERY.—A patentee that asserts a claim for
21
infringement of an inventor-owned patent in a civil action
22
under subsection (a), (b), (c), (f), or (g) of section 271
23
may elect, at any time before final judgment is entered
24
by the court, recovery under this subsection in lieu of dam-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
7
•HR 5478 IH
ages under section 284. If an election for recovery under
1
this subsection is made, the following provisions apply
2
upon a finding of infringement:
3
‘‘(1) PROFIT DISGORGEMENT.—The court shall
4
award the patentee the profits from the use made of
5
the invention by the infringer. In assessing profits
6
the patentee shall be required to prove only the in-
7
fringer’s revenues resulting from the infringement;
8
the infringer must prove all elements of cost or de-
9
duction claimed.
10
‘‘(2) INTEREST AND COSTS.—The court shall
11
award the patentee the costs described under section
12
1920 of title 28.
13
‘‘(3) INFRINGEMENT FOUND WILLFUL.—If the
14
court finds the infringement to be willful, the court
15
may award the patentee damages equal to no more
16
than three times the amount of the profits found in
17
paragraph (1).
18
‘‘(4) ATTORNEYS FEES.—The court shall award
19
the patentee any amount of their attorneys fees that
20
exceeds 10 percent of the amount of the profits and
21
damages of paragraphs (1) to (3).’’.
22
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—
23
The table of sections for chapter 32 of title 35, United
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
8
•HR 5478 IH
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-
1
lowing:
2
‘‘330. Inventor protections.’’.
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
00:09 Dec 28, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H5478.IH
H5478
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.