Federal
Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act of 2019
Source: Congress.gov ·
2,495 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 2878
To limit the use of facial recognition technology by Federal agencies, and
for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
NOVEMBER 14, 2019
Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was
read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To limit the use of facial recognition technology by Federal
agencies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Facial Recognition
4
Technology Warrant Act of 2019’’.
5
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
6
In this Act:
7
(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the
8
meaning given the term in section 551 of title 5,
9
United States Code.
10
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•S 2878 IS
(2) COVERED COURT ORDER.—The term ‘‘cov-
1
ered court order’’ means a court order obtained in
2
accordance with rule 41 of the Federal Rules of
3
Criminal Procedure and in connection with the in-
4
vestigation of an offense for which an order could be
5
sought under section 2516 of title 18, United States
6
Code.
7
(3) FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY.—The
8
term ‘‘facial recognition technology’’ means tech-
9
nology that analyzes facial features and is used for
10
the unique personal identification of individuals in
11
still or video images.
12
(4) ONGOING SURVEILLANCE.—The term ‘‘on-
13
going surveillance’’—
14
(A) means the utilization of facial recogni-
15
tion technology to engage in a sustained effort
16
to track the physical movements of an identified
17
individual through 1 or more public places
18
where such movements occur over a period of
19
time greater than 72 hours, whether in real
20
time or through application of such technology
21
to historical records; and
22
(B) does not include instances where facial
23
recognition technology is utilized for a single
24
identification or attempted identification of an
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•S 2878 IS
individual, if no subsequent attempt is made to
1
track that individual’s movement in real time or
2
through the use of historical records after the
3
individual has been identified.
4
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION
5
TECHNOLOGY.
6
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), an offi-
7
cer or employee of an agency may not use facial recogni-
8
tion technology to engage in ongoing surveillance of an
9
individual or group of individuals in a public space, un-
10
less—
11
(1) the use of the facial recognition technology
12
is in support of a law enforcement activity; and
13
(2)(A) a covered court order has been obtained
14
to allow the use of facial recognition technology for
15
ongoing surveillance of the individual or group of in-
16
dividuals; or
17
(B) an investigative or law enforcement offi-
18
cer—
19
(i) reasonably determines that exigent cir-
20
cumstances and compelling law enforcement
21
needs make it impractical to obtain a covered
22
court order;
23
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•S 2878 IS
(ii) reasonably determines that there are
1
grounds for which a covered court order could
2
be obtained under subparagraph (A); and
3
(iii) causes an application for a covered
4
court order to be made in accordance with sub-
5
paragraph (A) not later than 48 hours after the
6
use of facial recognition technology to engage in
7
ongoing surveillance.
8
(b) REQUIREMENT.—If an application for a covered
9
court order made under subsection (a)(2)(B) is denied, the
10
use of facial recognition technology shall terminate at the
11
time of the denial.
12
(c) DURATION OF ORDERS.—
13
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), a
14
covered court order may only authorize ongoing sur-
15
veillance until the date on which the objective of the
16
order is satisfied, except that such order may not
17
authorize ongoing surveillance for a period of longer
18
than 30 days.
19
(2) REQUIREMENT.—The 30-day period de-
20
scribed in paragraph (1) shall begin on the earlier
21
of—
22
(A) the date on which the agency begins to
23
use facial recognition technology; or
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•S 2878 IS
(B) the date that is 10 days after the
1
court order is issued.
2
(3) EXTENSION.—A court may grant an exten-
3
sion of the 30-day period described in paragraph (1)
4
if the extension satisfies the requirements of sub-
5
section (a)(2)(A) and such extension may last not
6
longer than 30 days.
7
(d) MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENT.—Any use of fa-
8
cial recognition technology pursuant to a covered court
9
order shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize
10
the acquisition, retention, and dissemination of informa-
11
tion about the individuals other than those for whom there
12
was probable cause to seek the covered court order ob-
13
tained under subsection (a)(2)(A).
14
(e) MOTION TO SUPPRESS.—
15
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para-
16
graph (2), any aggrieved individual who has been
17
the subject of ongoing surveillance using facial rec-
18
ognition technology, in any trial, hearing, or pro-
19
ceeding in or before any court, department, officer,
20
agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the
21
United States, a State, or a political subdivision
22
thereof, may move to suppress information directly
23
obtained through the use of facial recognition tech-
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•S 2878 IS
nology, or evidence derived therefrom, in violation of
1
this section, on the grounds that—
2
(A) the information was unlawfully ob-
3
tained;
4
(B) the order of authorization or approval
5
under which the information was obtained is in-
6
sufficient on its face; or
7
(C) the use of facial recognition technology
8
was not used in conformity with the order of
9
authorization or approval.
10
(2) EXCEPTION.—Evidence obtained through
11
the use of facial recognition technology in violation
12
of this section shall not be suppressed under para-
13
graph (1) if the evidence was acquired by an officer
14
or an employee of an agency with an objectively rea-
15
sonable belief that the use of facial recognition tech-
16
nology was in compliance with this section.
17
(3) REQUIREMENT.—A motion described in
18
paragraph (1) shall be made before the trial, hear-
19
ing, or proceeding unless there was no opportunity
20
to make such motion or the individual was not aware
21
of the grounds of the motion. If the motion is grant-
22
ed, the information directly obtained through the use
23
of facial recognition technology, or evidence derived
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
7
•S 2878 IS
therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained
1
in violation of this section.
2
(4) INSPECTION OF INFORMATION.—The judge,
3
upon the filing of a motion under this subsection by
4
the aggrieved individual, may in his or her discretion
5
make available to the aggrieved individual or counsel
6
of the aggrieved individual for inspection such por-
7
tions of the information or evidence derived there-
8
from as the judge determines to be in the interests
9
of justice.
10
(5) APPEAL.—In addition to any other right to
11
appeal, the United States shall have the right to ap-
12
peal from an order granting a motion to suppress
13
made under this subsection, or the denial of an ap-
14
plication for an order of approval, if the United
15
States attorney shall certify to the judge or other of-
16
ficial granting such motion or denying such applica-
17
tion that the appeal is not taken for purposes of
18
delay. Such appeal shall be taken within 30 days
19
after the date the order was entered and shall be
20
diligently prosecuted.
21
(6) LIMITATION.—The remedies and sanctions
22
described in this subsection with respect to the use
23
of facial recognition technology are the only judicial
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
8
•S 2878 IS
remedies and sanctions for nonconstitutional viola-
1
tions of this section involving such technology.
2
(f) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION.—Noth-
3
ing in this section shall be construed to affect the use of
4
facial recognition technology to engage in ongoing surveil-
5
lance connected with the acquisition of foreign intelligence
6
information, as defined in section 101(e) of the Foreign
7
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801(e)).
8
SEC. 4. REPORTS ON GOVERNMENT USE OF FACIAL REC-
9
OGNITION TECHNOLOGY.
10
(a) REPORT BY JUDGE.—Not later than 30 days
11
after issuance of a covered court order under section
12
3(a)(2)(A) or an extension thereof under section 3(c)(3),
13
or the denial of such a warrant or extension, the issuing
14
or denying judge shall report to the Administrative Office
15
of the United States Courts—
16
(1) the fact that a warrant or extension was ap-
17
plied for;
18
(2) the fact that the warrant or extension was
19
granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied;
20
(3) the period of time for which the warrant ap-
21
proves the use of facial recognition technology, and
22
the number and duration of any extensions; and
23
(4) the offense specified in the warrant or ap-
24
plication.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
9
•S 2878 IS
(b) REPORTS.—Beginning 1 year after the date of
1
enactment of this Act, and not later than September 30
2
of each year thereafter, the Director of the Administrative
3
Office of the United States Courts shall transmit to the
4
Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Com-
5
mittee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives,
6
and make available to the public, a full and complete re-
7
port summarizing the data required to be filed with the
8
Administrative Office under subsection (a), including—
9
(1) the number of applications for covered court
10
orders and extensions authorizing delayed notice;
11
(2) the number of covered court orders and ex-
12
tensions granted or denied during the preceding fis-
13
cal year;
14
(3) for each covered court order or extension
15
granted—
16
(A) the period of time for which the war-
17
rant approves the use of facial recognition tech-
18
nology, and the number and duration of any ex-
19
tensions;
20
(B) the offense specified in the covered
21
court order or application, or extension of an
22
order;
23
(C) the identity of the applying investiga-
24
tive or law enforcement officer and agency mak-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
10
•S 2878 IS
ing the application and the person authorizing
1
the application; and
2
(D) the nature of the facilities or cameras
3
from which the data analyzed by facial recogni-
4
tion technology came from;
5
(4) a general description of the identifications
6
made under a covered court order or extension, in-
7
cluding—
8
(A) the approximate nature and frequency
9
of use of the facial recognition technology;
10
(B) the approximate number of persons
11
who were subjected to analysis using the facial
12
recognition technology; and
13
(C) the approximate nature, amount, and
14
cost of the manpower and other resources dur-
15
ing the use of the facial recognition technology;
16
and
17
(5) the number of misidentifications, including
18
any arrest of an individual that does not result in
19
charges being entered against the individual, made
20
based upon information directly obtained through
21
the use of facial recognition technology, or evidence
22
derived therefrom.
23
(c) REGULATIONS.—The Director of the Administra-
24
tive Office of the United States Courts, in consultation
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
11
•S 2878 IS
with the Attorney General, may issue guidance regarding
1
the content and form of the reports required to be filed
2
under subsection (a).
3
SEC. 5. HUMAN REVIEW AND TESTING.
4
(a) HUMAN REVIEW OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECH-
5
NOLOGY.—An agency shall require a trained officer to ex-
6
amine the output or recommendation of any facial recogni-
7
tion system before the agency investigates or otherwise
8
interacts with an individual identified by the system in
9
connection with a covered court order issued under section
10
3(a)(2)(A) or in connection with an emergency under sec-
11
tion 3(a)(2)(B).
12
(b) TESTING.—The head of each agency, in consulta-
13
tion with the Director of the National Institute of Stand-
14
ards and Technology, shall establish testing procedures re-
15
garding all facial recognition technology systems used by
16
the agency, including a process to—
17
(1) periodically undertake independent tests of
18
the performance of the system in typical operational
19
conditions;
20
(2) identify relative performance across dif-
21
ferent subpopulations, including error rates when
22
the system is tested across subpopulations, alone
23
and in combination with, different skin tones, ages,
24
and genders; and
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
12
•S 2878 IS
(3) review such tests and take action to improve
1
the accuracy of the system across subpopulations
2
upon a finding indicating there are disparate error
3
rates when the system is tested across subpopula-
4
tions.
5
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:39 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 099200
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\S2878.IS
S2878
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.