Federal
Police Exercising Absolute Care With Everyone Act of 2019
Source: Congress.gov ·
2,324 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 4359
To provide that a Federal law enforcement officer may not use deadly force
or less lethal force unless such force is necessary, to encourage States
to adopt similar laws or policies, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 17, 2019
Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Mr. CLAY, Mr. RUSH, Mr. THOMPSON of Mis-
sissippi, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. NOR-
TON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. VEASEY,
Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JACKSON
LEE, Mr. GARCI´A of Illinois, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. CARSON of
Indiana, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. POCAN, Ms. WATERS, and Ms.
JAYAPAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide that a Federal law enforcement officer may not
use deadly force or less lethal force unless such force
is necessary, to encourage States to adopt similar laws
or policies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police Exercising Ab-
4
solute Care With Everyone Act of 2019’’.
5
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•HR 4359 IH
SEC. 2. USE OF FORCE BY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
1
OFFICERS.
2
(a) PROHIBITION ON LESS LETHAL FORCE.—A Fed-
3
eral law enforcement officer may not use any less lethal
4
force unless such less lethal force is necessary and propor-
5
tional in order to effectuate an arrest of a person who
6
the officer has probable cause to believe has committed
7
a criminal offense, and only after exhausting reasonable
8
alternatives to the use of such force.
9
(b) PROHIBITION ON DEADLY USE OF FORCE.—A
10
Federal law enforcement officer may not use deadly force
11
against a person unless—
12
(1) such force is necessary, as a last resort, to
13
prevent imminent and serious bodily injury or death
14
to the officer or another person;
15
(2) the use of such forces creates no substantial
16
risk of injury to a third person; and
17
(3) reasonable alternatives to the use of such
18
force have been exhausted.
19
(c) REQUIREMENT TO GIVE VERBAL WARNING.—
20
When feasible, prior to using force against a person, a
21
Federal law enforcement officer shall identify himself or
22
herself as a law enforcement officer, and issue a verbal
23
warning to the person that the law enforcement officer
24
seeks to apprehend, which warning includes—
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•HR 4359 IH
(1) a request that the person surrender to the
1
law enforcement officer; and
2
(2) notifies the person that the law enforcement
3
officer will use force against the person if the person
4
resists arrest or flees.
5
(d) GUIDANCE ON USE OF FORCE.—Not later than
6
120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
7
Attorney General, in consultation with impacted persons,
8
communities, or organizations, including representatives
9
of civil and human rights organizations, victims of police
10
use of force, and representatives of law enforcement asso-
11
ciations, shall provide guidance to Federal law enforce-
12
ment agencies on the types of less lethal force and deadly
13
force that are prohibited under subsections (a) and (b),
14
and how a Federal law enforcement officer can assess
15
whether the use of force is appropriate and necessary, and
16
use the least amount of force when interacting with—
17
(1) pregnant women;
18
(2) children and youth under age 21;
19
(3) elderly persons;
20
(4) persons with mental, behavioral, or physical
21
disabilities or impairments;
22
(5) persons experiencing perceptual or cognitive
23
impairments due to use of alcohol, narcotics, hallu-
24
cinogenic, or other drugs;
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•HR 4359 IH
(6) persons suffering from a serious medical
1
condition; and
2
(7) persons with limited English proficiency.
3
(e) TRAINING.—The Attorney General shall provide
4
training to Federal law enforcement officers on interacting
5
people described in paragraphs (1) through (7) of sub-
6
section (d).
7
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
8
(1) DEADLY FORCE.—The term ‘‘deadly force’’
9
means force that creates a substantial risk of caus-
10
ing death or serious bodily injury, including the dis-
11
charge of a firearm, respiratory chokeholds, and
12
multiple discharges of an electronic control weapon.
13
(2) FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.—
14
The term ‘‘Federal law enforcement officer’’ means
15
any officer, agent, or employee of the United States
16
authorized by law or by a Government agency to en-
17
gage in or supervise the prevention, detection, inves-
18
tigation, or prosecution of any violation of Federal
19
criminal law.
20
(3) LESS LETHAL FORCE.—The term ‘‘less le-
21
thal force’’ means any degree of force that is not
22
likely to have lethal effect.
23
(4) NECESSARY.—The term ‘‘necessary’’ means
24
that another reasonable Federal law enforcement of-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•HR 4359 IH
ficer would objectively conclude, under the totality of
1
the circumstances, that there was no reasonable al-
2
ternative to the use of force.
3
(5) REASONABLE
ALTERNATIVES.—The term
4
‘‘reasonable alternatives’’ means tactics and methods
5
used by a law enforcement officer to effectuate an
6
arrest that do not unreasonably increase the risk
7
posed to the law enforcement officer or another per-
8
son, including verbal communication, distance, warn-
9
ings, deescalation tactics and techniques, tactical
10
repositioning, and other tactics and techniques in-
11
tended to stabilize the situation and reduce the im-
12
mediacy of the risk so that more time, options, and
13
resources can be called upon to resolve the situation
14
without the use of force. With respect to the use of
15
deadly force, such term includes the use of less le-
16
thal force.
17
(6)
DEESCALATION
TACTICS
AND
TECH-
18
NIQUES.—The term ‘‘deescalation tactics and tech-
19
niques’’ means proactive actions and approaches
20
used by a law enforcement officer to stabilize the sit-
21
uation so that more time, options, and resources are
22
available to gain a person’s voluntary compliance
23
and reduce or eliminate the need to use force, in-
24
cluding verbal persuasion, warnings, tactical tech-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•HR 4359 IH
niques, slowing down the pace of an incident, wait-
1
ing out a subject, creating distance between the offi-
2
cer and the threat, and requesting additional re-
3
sources to resolve the incident.
4
(7) TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES.—The
5
term ‘‘totality of the circumstances’’ means all cred-
6
ible facts known to the law enforcement officer lead-
7
ing up to and at the time of the use of force, includ-
8
ing the actions of the person against whom the law
9
enforcement officer uses such force and the actions
10
of the law enforcement officer.
11
(g) LIMITATION ON JUSTIFICATION DEFENSE.—
12
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Chapter 51 of title 18,
13
United States Code, is amended by adding at the
14
end the following:
15
‘‘§ 1123. Limitation on justification defense for Fed-
16
eral law enforcement officers
17
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It is not a defense to an offense
18
under section 1111 or 1112 that the use of less lethal or
19
deadly force was justified in the case of a Federal law en-
20
forcement officer—
21
‘‘(1) whose use of such force was inconsistent
22
with section 2 of the Police Exercising Absolute
23
Care With Everyone Act of 2019; or
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
7
•HR 4359 IH
‘‘(2) whose gross negligence, leading up to and
1
at the time of the use of force, contributed to the
2
necessity of the use of such force.
3
‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘Federal
4
law enforcement officer’ has the meaning given such term
5
in section 115.’’.
6
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec-
7
tions for chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code,
8
is amended by inserting after the item related to
9
section 1122 the following:
10
‘‘1123. Limitation on justification defense for Federal law enforcement offi-
cers.’’.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON THE RECEIPT OF FUNDS UNDER
11
THE EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE AS-
12
SISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM.
13
(a) LIMITATION.—A State or other jurisdiction may
14
not receive funds that the State or other jurisdiction would
15
otherwise receive under subpart 1 of part E of title I of
16
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
17
(34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq.) for any fiscal year in which
18
the State or other jurisdiction does not have in place a
19
law that is consistent with section 2 of this Act and section
20
1123 of title 18, United States Code, as determined by
21
the Attorney General.
22
(b) SUBSEQUENT ENACTMENT.—In the case that
23
funds described in subsection (a) are withheld from a
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
8
•HR 4359 IH
State or other jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (a), and
1
the State or other jurisdiction subsequently enacts or puts
2
in place a law described in subsection (a), and dem-
3
onstrates substantial efforts to enforce such law, the State
4
or other jurisdiction shall be eligible, in the subsequent
5
fiscal year, to receive the total amount that the State or
6
other jurisdiction would have received in each fiscal year
7
for which funds were withheld, not to exceed the total that
8
such State or other jurisdiction would have received for
9
a period of 5 years.
10
(c) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 120 days after the
11
date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General,
12
in consultation with impacted persons, communities, orga-
13
nizations (including representatives of civil and human
14
rights organizations), individuals against whom a law en-
15
forcement officer used force, and representatives of law
16
enforcement associations, shall make guidance available to
17
States and other jurisdictions on the criteria that the At-
18
torney General will use in determining whether the State
19
or jurisdiction has in place a law described in subsection
20
(a).
21
(d) APPLICATION.—This section shall apply begin-
22
ning in the first fiscal year that begins after the date that
23
is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
9
•HR 4359 IH
SEC. 4. GRANTS FOR USE OF FORCE POLICY.
1
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Attorney General is au-
2
thorized to make grants to units of local government in
3
States that do not have in place a law that is substantially
4
similar to section 2 of this Act and section 1123 of title
5
18, United States Code, and which State did not receive
6
funds under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus
7
Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C.
8
10151 et seq.) pursuant to section 3, if the law enforce-
9
ment agency of that unit of local government has in place
10
a policy related to the use of force by law enforcement
11
officers that is consistent with section 2 of this Act.
12
(b) APPLICATION.—A unit of local government seek-
13
ing a grant under this section may submit to the Attorney
14
General an application at such time, in such manner, and
15
containing such information as the Attorney General may
16
reasonably require.
17
(c) AMOUNT.—The amount of a grant under this sec-
18
tion shall be an amount which is equal to the amount the
19
unit of local government would otherwise have received
20
under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime
21
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151
22
et seq.), if the State in which the unit of local government
23
is located had received funds under such program.
24
(d) USE OF FUNDS.—A grant under this section may
25
be used for the purposes described in section 501 of title
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
10
•HR 4359 IH
I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of
1
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10152).
2
(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
3
authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be nec-
4
essary to carry out this section for each fiscal year, begin-
5
ning 2020 through 2024.
6
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:16 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4359.IH
H4359
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.