Federal
Allowing for the Safe Return of Rohingyas to Burma Act of 2019
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,155 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 4392
To direct the President to withdraw the application of the duty-free treatment
with respect to Burma under the Generalized System of Preferences
program, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
Mr. SHERMAN (for himself and Mrs. WAGNER) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To direct the President to withdraw the application of the
duty-free treatment with respect to Burma under the
Generalized System of Preferences program, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Allowing for the Safe
4
Return of Rohingyas to Burma Act of 2019’’.
5
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
6
Congress finds the following:
7
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•HR 4392 IH
(1) Since August 2017, the Burmese military,
1
the Tatmadaw, has engaged in a brutal crackdown
2
on the Rohingya population in the northern Rakhine
3
state of Burma (formerly Myanmar).
4
(2) Before the 2017 crisis, an estimated
5
1,000,000 Rohingya people lived in the Rakhine
6
state.
7
(3) As a result of the brutal crackdown of
8
2017, 740,000 Rohingyas have fled to Bangladesh
9
and another 127,000 Rohingya fled to camps for in-
10
ternally displaced persons (IDPs) in the central
11
Rakhine state.
12
(4) Bangladesh was already enduring a humani-
13
tarian crisis as a result of approximately 287,000
14
Rohingya refugees fleeing Burma during earlier
15
crackdowns by the Burmese military in 2012 and
16
2016.
17
(5) In March 2019, the United Nations Office
18
for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs esti-
19
mated there were 909,000 registered Rohingya in
20
Bangladeshi refugee camps.
21
(6) On March 5, 2019, the United States Agen-
22
cy for International Development reported that the
23
United
States
has
contributed
more
than
24
$494,000,000 to Bangladesh since August 2017 in
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•HR 4392 IH
order to help Bangladesh cope with the influx of
1
Rohingya refugees.
2
(7) The U.S. Secretary of State has called the
3
Burmese security forces attacks on the Rohingya an
4
‘‘ethnic cleansing’’ but has yet to recognize them as
5
a crime against humanity or genocide.
6
(8) On December 13, 2018, the United States
7
House of Representatives passed House Resolution
8
1091, which expressed the sense of the House that
9
‘‘the atrocities committed against the Rohingya by
10
the Burmese military and security forces since Au-
11
gust 2017 constitute crimes against humanity and
12
genocide’’ and called upon the Secretary of State to
13
review the available evidence and make a similar de-
14
termination.
15
(9) The United Nations Human Rights Coun-
16
cil’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission
17
on Myanmar (the Mission) concluded in August
18
2018 and August 2019 reports that ‘‘there is suffi-
19
cient information to warrant the investigation and
20
prosecution’’ of Tatmadaw officials to determine
21
their ‘‘liability for genocide’’ and also found that a
22
‘‘pervasive culture of impunity at the domestic
23
level,’’ which led the Mission to conclude that ‘‘the
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•HR 4392 IH
impetus for accountability must come from the inter-
1
national community’’.
2
(10) The ability of Rohingyas to leave Ban-
3
gladesh to return home is impeded by many factors,
4
not least of which: the lack of Burmese citizenship
5
for the Rohingya minority, that the homes of the
6
Rohingya were largely destroyed in the 2017 vio-
7
lence, and that Rohingya still fear the ongoing vio-
8
lence due to the civil war and military officers who
9
act with impunity against the local civilian popu-
10
lation.
11
(11) In 2016, after a 27-year suspension pe-
12
riod, the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)
13
program for Burma was re-instated, and Burma was
14
designated as a least-developed beneficiary devel-
15
oping country under the program.
16
(12) Just one year after having the GSP pro-
17
gram reinstated, Burma’s GSP-eligible exports to
18
the United States were valued at $93,900,000, the
19
second highest value for least-developed beneficiary
20
developing countries after Cambodia.
21
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•HR 4392 IH
SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL OF DESIGNATION OF BURMA UNDER
1
THE
GENERALIZED
SYSTEM
OF
PREF-
2
ERENCES PROGRAM.
3
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the
4
date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall with-
5
draw the application of the duty-free treatment under title
6
V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.) with
7
respect to Burma.
8
(b) CERTIFICATION.—The President may reinstate
9
the application of duty-free treatment under title V of the
10
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.) with respect
11
to Burma after the date on which the authority of sub-
12
section (a) is exercised only if the President submits to
13
the appropriate congressional committees a certification
14
that contains a determination of the President that the
15
Government of Burma—
16
(1) allows for the safe, voluntary, and dignified
17
return of Rohingya refugees;
18
(2) has taken the necessary steps to provide
19
Burmese citizenship to such Rohingya refugees; and
20
(3) has addressed the root causes of the crisis
21
in Rakhine State.
22
SEC. 4. APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE-
23
FINED.
24
In this Act, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional com-
25
mittees’’ means—
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•HR 4392 IH
(1) the congressional defense committees (as
1
such term is defined in section 101 of title 10,
2
United States Code);
3
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Per-
4
manent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the
5
Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
6
Representatives; and
7
(3) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the
8
Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Com-
9
mittee on Finance of the Senate.
10
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
01:35 Sep 21, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H4392.IH
H4392
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.