Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
PUBLIC LAW 116–275—DEC. 31, 2020
ONE SMALL STEP TO PROTECT HUMAN
HERITAGE IN SPACE ACT
VerDate Sep 11 2014
15:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 019139
PO 00275
Frm 00001
Fmt 6579
Sfmt 6579
E:\PUBLAW\PUBL275.116
PUBL275
dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS
134 STAT. 3358
PUBLIC LAW 116–275—DEC. 31, 2020
Public Law 116–275
116th Congress
An Act
To require the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to add recommenda-
tions and inform other relevant agencies of information relating to the principle
of due regard and the limitation of harmful interference with Apollo landing
site artifacts, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘One Small Step to Protect
Human Heritage in Space Act’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On July 16, 1969, the Apollo 11 spacecraft launched
from the John F. Kennedy Space Center carrying Neil A. Arm-
strong, Edwin E. ‘‘Buzz’’ Aldrin, Jr., and Michael Collins.
(2) July 20, 2019, marked the 50th anniversary of the
date on which the Apollo 11 spacecraft landed on the Moon
and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans
to set foot on a celestial body off the Earth.
(3) The landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft and humanity’s
first off-world footprints are achievements unparalleled in his-
tory, a direct product of the work and perseverance of the
more than 400,000 individuals who contributed to the develop-
ment of the Apollo missions on the shoulders of centuries
of science and engineering pioneers from all corners of the
world.
(4) Among the thousands of individuals who have contrib-
uted to the achievements of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (in this section referred to as ‘‘NASA’’) are
African-American women such as Katherine Johnson, Dorothy
Vaughn, Mary Jackson, and Dr. Christine Darden, who made
critical contributions to NASA space programs. Katherine John-
son worked at NASA for 35 years and calculated the trajectory
of the Apollo 11 landing and the trajectories for the spaceflights
of astronauts Alan Shepard and John Glenn. Katherine John-
son, together with many other individuals the work of whom
often went unacknowledged, helped broaden the scope of space
travel and charted new frontiers for humanity’s exploration
of space.
(5) The landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft was made
on behalf of all humankind, and Neil Armstrong and Buzz
Aldrin were accompanied by messages of peace from the leaders
of more than 70 countries.
Alan Shepard.
John Glenn.
Katherine
Johnson.
Dorothy Vaughn.
Mary Jackson.
Christine
Darden.
Neil A.
Armstrong.
Edwin E. Aldrin,
Jr.
Michael Collins.
One Small Step
to Protect
Human Heritage
in Space Act.
51 USC 30301
note prec.
Dec. 31, 2020
[S. 1694]
VerDate Sep 11 2014
15:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 019139
PO 00275
Frm 00002
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
E:\PUBLAW\PUBL275.116
PUBL275
dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS
134 STAT. 3359
PUBLIC LAW 116–275—DEC. 31, 2020
(6) The lunar landing sites of the Apollo 11 spacecraft,
the robotic spacecraft that preceded the Apollo 11 mission,
and the crewed and robotic spacecraft that followed, are of
outstanding universal value to humanity.
(7) Such landing sites—
(A) are the first archaeological sites with human
activity that are not on Earth;
(B) provide evidence of the first achievements of
humankind in the realm of space travel and exploration;
and
(C) contain artifacts and other evidence of human
exploration activities that remain a potential source of
cultural, historical, archaeological, anthropological, sci-
entific, and engineering knowledge.
(8) On July 20, 2011, NASA published the voluntary guid-
ance entitled ‘‘NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Enti-
ties: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific
Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts’’.
(9) In March 2018, the Office of Science and Technology
Policy published a report entitled ‘‘Protecting & Preserving
Apollo Program Lunar Landing Sites & Artifacts’’.
(10) Article one of the ‘‘Treaty on Principles Governing
the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer
Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies,’’ com-
monly known as the ‘‘Outer Space Treaty,’’ states ‘‘[o]uter space,
including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be free
for exploration and use by all States without discrimination
of any kind, on a basis of equality and in accordance with
international law, and there shall be free access to all areas
of celestial bodies.’’
(11) Article eight of the Outer Space Treaty states, ‘‘[a]
State Party to the Treaty on whose registry an object launched
into outer space is carried shall retain jurisdiction and control
over such object, and over any personnel thereof, while in
outer space or on a celestial body. Ownership of objects
launched into outer space, including objects landed or con-
structed on a celestial body, and of their component parts,
is not affected by their presence in outer space or on a celestial
body or by their return to the Earth.’’
(12) Article nine of the Outer Space Treaty states, ‘‘[i]n
the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon
and other celestial bodies, States Parties to the Treaty shall
be guided by the principle of co-operation and mutual assistance
and shall conduct all their activities in outer space, including
the moon and other celestial bodies, with due regard to the
corresponding interests of all other States Parties to the
Treaty,’’ and continues, ‘‘[i]f a State Party to the Treaty has
reason to believe that an activity or experiment planned by
it or its nationals in outer space, including the moon and
other celestial bodies, would cause potentially harmful inter-
ference with activities of other States Parties in the peaceful
exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and
other celestial bodies, it shall undertake appropriate inter-
national consultations before proceeding with any such activity
or experiment. A State Party to the Treaty which has reason
to believe that an activity or experiment planned by another
VerDate Sep 11 2014
15:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 019139
PO 00275
Frm 00003
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
E:\PUBLAW\PUBL275.116
PUBL275
dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS
134 STAT. 3360
PUBLIC LAW 116–275—DEC. 31, 2020
State Party in outer space, including the moon and other celes-
tial bodies, would cause potentially harmful interference with
activities in the peaceful exploration and use of outer space,
including the moon and other celestial bodies, may request
consultation concerning the activity or experiment.’’.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) as commercial enterprises and more countries acquire
the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to encourage
the development of best practices to respect the principle of
due regard and to limit harmful interference to the Apollo
landing site artifacts in acknowledgment of the human effort
and innovation they represent, as well as their archaeological,
anthropological, historical, scientific, and engineering signifi-
cance and value; and
(2) the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration should continue to develop best practices
to respect the principle of due regard and limit harmful inter-
ference with historic Apollo lunar landing site artifacts.
SEC. 3. BEST PRACTICES RELATED TO APOLLO HISTORIC LUNAR
LANDING SITE ARTIFACTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration shall—
(1) add the recommendations in subsection (b) as a condi-
tion or requirement to contracts, grants, agreements, partner-
ships or other arrangements pertaining to lunar activities car-
ried out by, for, or in partnership with the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration;
(2) inform other relevant Federal agencies of the rec-
ommendations described in subsection (b); and
(3) encourage the use of best practices, consistent with
the recommendations in subsection (b), by other relevant Fed-
eral agencies.
(b) RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIBED.—The recommendations
described in this subsection are—
(1) ‘‘NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities:
How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value
of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts’’ issued by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration on July 20, 2011, and
updated on October 28, 2011; and
(2) any successor recommendations, guidelines, best prac-
tices, or standards relating to the principle of due regard and
the limitation of harmful interference with Apollo landing site
artifacts issued by the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
(c) EXEMPTION.—The Administrator may waive the conditions
or requirements from subsection (a)(1) as it applies to an individual
contract, grant, agreement, partnership or other arrangement per-
taining to lunar activities carried out by, for, or in partnership
with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration so long
as—
(1) such waiver is accompanied by a finding from the
Administrator that carrying out the obligation of subsection
(a)(1) would be unduly prohibitive to an activity or activities
of
legitimate
and
significant
historical,
archaeological,
anthropological, scientific, or engineering value; and
Waiver authority.
Applicability.
VerDate Sep 11 2014
15:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 019139
PO 00275
Frm 00004
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
E:\PUBLAW\PUBL275.116
PUBL275
dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS
134 STAT. 3361
PUBLIC LAW 116–275—DEC. 31, 2020
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1694:
SENATE REPORTS: No. 116–194 (Comm. on Commerce, Science, and Transporta-
tion).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
Vol. 165 (2019): July 18, considered and passed Senate.
Vol. 166 (2020): Dec. 16, considered and passed House, amended.
Dec. 19, Senate concurred in House amendments.
Æ
(2) the finding in paragraph (1) is provided to the Com-
mittee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate not later than 30 days prior
to the waiver taking effect.
Approved December 31, 2020.
Deadline.
VerDate Sep 11 2014
15:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 019139
PO 00275
Frm 00005
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6580
E:\PUBLAW\PUBL275.116
PUBL275
dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS