Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 2122
To require the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a
study on the contracting practices of the Corps of Engineers, with
a specific focus on how the Corps complies with and enforces the require-
ment to pay prevailing wages on federally financed construction jobs.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 8, 2019
Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. NORCROSS) introduced the fol-
lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Education and
Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdic-
tion of the committee concerned
A BILL
To require the Comptroller General of the United States
to carry out a study on the contracting practices of
the Corps of Engineers, with a specific focus on how
the Corps complies with and enforces the requirement
to pay prevailing wages on federally financed construc-
tion jobs.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 2122 IH
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
1
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Workers
2
Act’’.
3
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
4
The Congress finds the following:
5
(1) The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 (40 U.S.C.
6
3141 et seq.) requires that contractors and sub-
7
contractors on certain government projects pay con-
8
struction workers locally prevailing wages as deter-
9
mined by the Department of Labor.
10
(2) Locally prevailing wages vary by job classi-
11
fication and consist of a basic hourly rate of pay and
12
benefits.
13
(3) Generally, the Davis-Bacon Act applies to
14
projects that meet three criteria—
15
(A) there is a contract for construction in
16
excess of $2,000;
17
(B) the United States or the District of
18
Columbia is a party to the contract; and
19
(C) the contract is for construction, alter-
20
ation, or repair.
21
(4) Under the Davis-Bacon Act, the Govern-
22
ment may terminate a contract if locally prevailing
23
wages have not been paid to employees working on
24
the project.
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 2122 IH
(5) For close to 90 years, this law has helped
1
ensure quality craftsmanship on Federal projects,
2
protected the standard of living of skilled and
3
trained blue-collar construction workers, improved
4
workplace safety by discouraging low-road contrac-
5
tors from bidding, and stimulated the economy.
6
(6) The Wage and Hour Division of the De-
7
partment of Labor administers the Davis-Bacon Act
8
by, among other things, determining prevailing wage
9
rates and prescribing regulations and standards to
10
be observed by contracting agencies.
11
(7) Contracting agencies, such as the Corps of
12
Engineers, however, have the primary day-to-day re-
13
sponsibility for enforcement of the Davis-Bacon Act
14
and its labor standards requirements. See, e.g., sub-
15
parts 22.406 and 22.407 of the Federal Acquisition
16
Regulation.
17
(8) Some irresponsible contractors and sub-
18
contractors often avoid their prevailing wage obliga-
19
tions by, among other things, engaging in craft and
20
independent contractor misclassification.
21
(9) Craft misclassification refers to the practice
22
in which contractors misclassify high-skilled workers
23
as general laborers or other classifications in order
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 2122 IH
to avoid paying the higher prevailing wage rate ap-
1
plicable to the high-skilled work actually performed.
2
(10) Independent contractor misclassification
3
refers
to
the
practice
in
which
contractors
4
misclassify employees as independent contractors to
5
avoid paying prevailing wages, reduce labor costs,
6
and avoid State and Federal taxes.
7
(11) This practice denies workers access to fed-
8
erally prescribed prevailing wages for the work done
9
and related benefits. Communities also suffer be-
10
cause misclassification results in lower tax revenues
11
for Federal, State, and local governments.
12
(12) In 2000, the Department of Labor com-
13
missioned a study to determine the extent of
14
misclassification, and found that up to 30 percent of
15
audited firms had employees misclassified as inde-
16
pendent contractors.
17
(13) In light of the intended Federal invest-
18
ment for military construction projects for fiscal
19
year 2020, it is appropriate to investigate the com-
20
pliance of the Corps of Engineers with the require-
21
ments of the Davis-Bacon Act.
22
SEC. 3. GAO STUDY.
23
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of
24
the United States shall conduct a study on the contracting
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
5
•HR 2122 IH
practices of the Corps of Engineers, with a specific focus
1
on how the Corps of Engineers complies with and enforces
2
the requirement to pay prevailing wages on federally fi-
3
nanced construction jobs, as required by subchapter IV
4
of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly
5
referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act). The study shall con-
6
sider the following:
7
(1) Any programs or protocols the Corps of En-
8
gineers has in place for the purpose of carrying out
9
its Davis-Bacon Act enforcement obligations as set
10
forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
11
(2) Any programs or protocols the Corps of En-
12
gineers has in place for the purpose of identifying
13
and
addressing
independent
contractor
14
misclassification on projects subject to the Davis-
15
Bacon Act.
16
(3) The frequency with which the Corps of En-
17
gineers conducts site visits on each covered project
18
to monitor Davis-Bacon Act compliance.
19
(4) The frequency with which the Corps of En-
20
gineers monitors certified payroll reports submitted
21
by contractors and subcontractors on each covered
22
project.
23
(5) Whether the Corps of Engineers accepts
24
and investigates complaints of Davis-Bacon Act vio-
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
6
•HR 2122 IH
lations submitted by third parties, such as contrac-
1
tors and workers’ rights organizations.
2
(6) Whether the Corps of Engineers maintains
3
a database listing all contractors and subcontractors
4
who have, in one way or another, violated the Davis-
5
Bacon Act and whether the Corps consults this
6
database as part of its contract award process.
7
(7) The frequency, over the last five years, with
8
which the Corps of Engineers penalized, disqualified,
9
terminated, or moved for debarment of a contractor
10
for Davis-Bacon violations.
11
(8) How the Corps of Engineers verifies that
12
the contractors it hires for its projects are properly
13
licensed.
14
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year
15
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller
16
General of the United States shall submit to the Com-
17
mittee on Education and Labor, the Committee on Armed
18
Services, and the Committee on Transportation and Infra-
19
structure of the House of Representatives and the Com-
20
mittee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, the
21
Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on
22
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a
23
report that summarizes the results of the study required
24
under subsection (a), together with any recommendations
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
7
•HR 2122 IH
for legislative or regulatory action that would improve the
1
efforts of enforcing the requirement to pay prevailing
2
wages on federally financed construction jobs.
3
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:29 Apr 17, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2122.IH
H2122
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.