Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
II
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 663
To clarify the status and enhance the effectiveness of immigration courts,
and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
MARCH 5, 2019
Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO,
Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. SMITH, and Mr. BOOKER) in-
troduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To clarify the status and enhance the effectiveness of
immigration courts, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Immigration Court Im-
4
provement Act of 2019’’.
5
SEC. 2. FINDING; SENSE OF CONGRESS.
6
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the United States
7
tradition as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants
8
is best served by effective, fair, and impartial immigration
9
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•S 663 IS
judges who have decisional independence and are free
1
from political influence.
2
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con-
3
gress that—
4
(1) immigration judges—
5
(A) should be fair and impartial; and
6
(B) should have decisional independence
7
that is free from political pressure or influence;
8
and
9
(2) in order to promote even-handed, non-bi-
10
ased, decision-making that is representative of the
11
public at large, immigration judges should be se-
12
lected from a broad pool of candidates with a variety
13
of legal experience, such as law professors, private
14
practitioners, representatives of pro bono service and
15
other nongovernmental organizations, military offi-
16
cers, and government employees.
17
SEC. 3. PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT OF IMMIGRATION
18
JUDGES.
19
(a) DEFINED TERM.—Section 101(b)(4) of the Im-
20
migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(4)) is
21
amended to read as follows:
22
‘‘(4)(A) The term ‘immigration judge’ means an at-
23
torney who—
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•S 663 IS
‘‘(i) has been appointed by the Attorney Gen-
1
eral to serve as a United States immigration judge;
2
and
3
‘‘(ii) is qualified to conduct proceedings under
4
this Act, including removal proceedings under sec-
5
tion 240.
6
‘‘(B) An immigration judge shall be subject to such
7
supervision and shall perform such duties as the Attorney
8
General shall prescribe as long as such supervision does
9
not interfere with the immigration judge’s exercise of inde-
10
pendent decision-making authority over cases in which he
11
or she presides.
12
‘‘(C) An immigration judge shall be an attorney at
13
the time of his or her appointment by the Attorney Gen-
14
eral and shall maintain good standing or appropriate judi-
15
cial status (as defined solely by the licensing jurisdiction)
16
with the bar of the highest court of any State.
17
‘‘(D) The service of an immigration judge is deemed
18
to be judicial in nature. Actions taken by an immigration
19
judge while serving in a judicial capacity shall be reviewed
20
under the applicable Code of Judicial Conduct. Immigra-
21
tion judges shall not be subject to any code of attorney
22
behavior for conduct or actions taken while performing du-
23
ties as an immigration judge.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•S 663 IS
‘‘(E) An immigration judge may not be disciplined
1
for any good faith legal decisions made in the course of
2
hearing and deciding cases. Criticism of an immigration
3
judge, in a decision of any appellate court may not be con-
4
sidered or construed as a finding of misconduct.’’.
5
(b) PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS.—Any system of
6
completion goals or other efficiency standards imposed on
7
immigration judges (as defined in section 101(b)(4) of the
8
Immigration and Nationality Act)—
9
(1) may be used solely as management tools for
10
obtaining or allocating resources; and
11
(2) may not be used—
12
(A) to limit the independent authority of
13
immigration judges to fulfill their duties; or
14
(B) as a reflection of individual judicial
15
performance.
16
(c) JUDICIAL COMPLAINT PROCESS.—Not later than
17
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
18
Attorney General shall establish a transparent judicial
19
complaint process that is consistent with—
20
(1) the Guidelines for the Evaluation of Judi-
21
cial Performance developed by the American Bar As-
22
sociation; and
23
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•S 663 IS
(2) the judicial performance evaluation prin-
1
ciples developed by the Institute for the Advance-
2
ment of the American Legal System.
3
(d) ANNUAL LEAVE.—Every immigration judge shall
4
be presumed to have 15 years of Federal civilian service
5
for the purpose of the accrual of annual leave.
6
(e) CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION.—
7
(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the training
8
required under section 603(c) of the International
9
Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6473(c)),
10
the Attorney General shall provide immigration
11
judges with—
12
(A) meaningful, ongoing training, includ-
13
ing annual, in-person training, to maintain cur-
14
rent knowledge of immigration cases, changes
15
in the law and effective docketing practices; and
16
(B) time away from the bench to assimi-
17
late the knowledge gained through such train-
18
ing.
19
(2) SERVICE TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION.—Be-
20
cause of the ethical duty owed by immigration
21
judges to participate in continuing legal education,
22
including teaching of law at institutions of higher
23
learning and other activities to educate the public
24
and to improve the legal profession, the Attorney
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6
•S 663 IS
General may not prevent or interfere with the par-
1
ticipation of an immigration judge in any such bona
2
fide activities if—
3
(A) undertaken in conjunction with an es-
4
tablished university, law school, bar association,
5
or legal organization; and
6
(B) the immigration judge clearly indicates
7
that such participation is in his or her personal
8
capacity and does not reflect any official posi-
9
tions or policies.
10
(f) CONTEMPT AUTHORITY.—
11
(1) RULEMAKING.—
12
(A) INTERIM
REGULATIONS.—Not later
13
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
14
this Act, the Attorney General shall promulgate
15
interim regulations governing the exercise of
16
the authority given to immigration judges under
17
section 240(b)(1) of the Immigration and Na-
18
tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(1)) to sanction
19
contempt of an immigration judge’s exercise of
20
authority under such Act.
21
(B) FINAL REGULATIONS.—Not later than
22
180 days after the date of the enactment of this
23
Act, the Attorney General shall promulgate
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
7
•S 663 IS
final regulations governing the authority de-
1
scribed in subparagraph (A).
2
(2) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PROMULGATE REG-
3
ULATIONS.—If the Attorney General fails to comply
4
with subparagraph (1)(B), immigration judges
5
shall—
6
(A) make appropriate findings of con-
7
tempt; and
8
(B) submit such findings to the United
9
States District Court for the judicial district in
10
which the immigration judge is physically lo-
11
cated.
12
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:20 Mar 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\S663.IS
S663
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS