Federal
Calling on the President to resume the interpretation of section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution as originally intended and applied as law for a century.
Source: Congress.gov ·
825 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
IV
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. RES. 140
Calling on the President to resume the interpretation of section 1 of the
14th Amendment to the Constitution as originally intended and applied
as law for a century.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 22, 2019
Mr. BABIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
RESOLUTION
Calling on the President to resume the interpretation of
section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution
as originally intended and applied as law for a century.
Whereas the language of the 14th Amendment to the Con-
stitution is recognized as vital for its contributions to
civil rights law, due process, and equal protection under
the law;
Whereas the first sentence of section 1 of the 14th Amend-
ment to the Constitution was intended to assure that no
State could deny fair and due citizenship to any formerly
enslaved person domiciled in the United States;
Whereas the jurisdiction clause of the 14th Amendment was
specifically included to modify and clarify ‘‘all persons
born or naturalized in the United States’’;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:04 Feb 22, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR140.IH
HR140
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2
•HRES 140 IH
Whereas the words ‘‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’’, as
written in section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Con-
stitution, meant not owing any allegiance to another for-
eign power;
Whereas an illegal alien, upon setting foot into this Nation,
cannot meet the requirement of section 1 of the 14th
Amendment to reside in a State;
Whereas being born on United States soil by parents who are
illegally inside the country and therefore not under the
legal jurisdiction of the United States does not qualify a
person as a citizen of these United States but of the na-
tion to which the mother or father hold citizenship;
Whereas if a person is present in the United States illegally,
a child born in the United States to that parent would
owe allegiance to that foreign power which has jurisdic-
tion over that parent;
Whereas interpretation of section 1 of the 14th Amendment
devolved in the latter half of the 20th century away from
the original intent and clear meaning upon ratification of
the amendment;
Whereas the first sentence of section 1 of the 14th Amend-
ment to the Constitution has been manipulated and
abused by illegal aliens to unfairly gain citizenship for
their children and incentivizes illegality;
Whereas ending the practice of automatically extending citi-
zenship to children born in the United States by a moth-
er in the country illegally and therefore not under the ju-
risdiction of the United States should not require an ad-
ditional constitutional amendment;
Whereas those in the United States illegally are subject to
our laws by their presence within our border, but are not
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:04 Feb 22, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR140.IH
HR140
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3
•HRES 140 IH
subject to the more complete jurisdiction envisioned by
the 14th Amendment as a precondition for automatic
citizenship;
Whereas the Supreme Court has never held that children
born on United States soil to parents who are in the
country illegally should automatically receive citizenship;
Whereas a sovereign nation has the right to determine its
own qualifications for citizenship;
Whereas only 30 sovereign nations recognize a form of birth-
right citizenship, including only two, the United States
and Canada, classified by the International Monetary
Fund as first world countries;
Whereas during this century three sovereign nations, Ireland,
New Zealand, and Australia, have ended their practice of
birthright citizenship; and
Whereas section 5 of the 14th Amendment explicitly dele-
gates to Congress the right to determine how the provi-
sions of the amendment are to be applied: Now, there-
fore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
1
(1) calls upon the Government of the United
2
States to return to the proper, original, and in-
3
tended interpretation of section 1 of the 14th
4
Amendment, taking into account the jurisdiction
5
clause;
6
(2) disapproves of birthright citizenship and in-
7
tends to pursue legislative measures if necessary to
8
ensure the practice is appropriately ended;
9
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:04 Feb 22, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR140.IH
HR140
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4
•HRES 140 IH
(3) supports the directives of the Trump Ad-
1
ministration to properly interpret section 1 of the
2
14th Amendment and, if necessary, seek judicial
3
clarification as to the intent of the language of the
4
amendment; and
5
(4) will seek, if necessary, a legislative solution
6
to end birthright citizenship.
7
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
23:04 Feb 22, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR140.IH
HR140
pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.