Federal
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the necessity to publically exonerate the African-American sailors of the United States Navy who were tried and convicted of mutiny in connection with their service at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Concord, California, during World War II in order to further aid in healing the racial divide that continues to exist in the United States.
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,351 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
IV
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. RES. 126
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the necessity
to publically exonerate the African-American sailors of the United States
Navy who were tried and convicted of mutiny in connection with their
service at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Concord, California,
during World War II in order to further aid in healing the racial
divide that continues to exist in the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 13, 2019
Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself and Ms. LEE of California) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regard-
ing the necessity to publically exonerate the African-
American sailors of the United States Navy who were
tried and convicted of mutiny in connection with their
service at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Concord,
California, during World War II in order to further
aid in healing the racial divide that continues to exist
in the United States.
Whereas, on July 17, 1944, the deadliest home-front disaster
of World War II occurred at the Port Chicago Naval
Magazine in Concord, California, when an explosion at
the naval facility killed or wounded 710 people, 435 of
whom were African-American;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2
•HRES 126 IH
Whereas this single stunning disaster accounted for more
than 15 percent of all African-American naval casualties
during World War II;
Whereas, after the disaster, 258 African-American survivors
of the explosion refused to resume the loading and un-
loading of ammunition at the naval facility, citing inad-
equate training and the use of unsafe practices;
Whereas, according to a United States Navy report, ‘‘the ac-
tual work of loading ammunition and explosives aboard
the ships was performed exclusively by Afro-Americans
under the supervision of white officers and Afro-Amer-
ican petty officers’’;
Whereas, according to a United States Navy report, ‘‘the rou-
tine assignment of Afro-American enlisted personnel to
manual labor was clearly motivated by race and premised
upon the mistaken notion that they were intellectually in-
ferior and thus incapable of meeting the same standards
as their white counterparts’’;
Whereas one of the ships was loaded with some 4,600 tons
of ammunition and high explosives, some weighing 650
pounds with activating mechanisms or fuses installed;
Whereas at that time there was no formal training in safe
methods of ammunition handling given to enlisted men;
Whereas the Navy failed to adequately provide these enlisted
men with the tools necessary to operate under safe work-
ing conditions, even after the explosion occurred;
Whereas, weeks before the explosion, the longshoremen’s
union warned the Navy that there would be a disaster if
the Navy continued to use untrained seamen to load am-
munition, and offered to send experienced longshoremen
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3
•HRES 126 IH
to train Navy recruits in safe handling of ammunition,
but this offer was ignored by the Navy;
Whereas subsequent research has confirmed the use of unsafe
ammunition loading methods at the naval facility at the
time and has documented the existence of pervasive racial
prejudice in the United States Navy during World War
II;
Whereas according to the book ‘‘The Port Chicago Mutiny’’
by Dr. Robert Allen, a worker described Port Chicago as
a ‘‘slave outfit’’, adding that ‘‘we were considered a cheap
labor force from the beginning’’;
Whereas White officers would encourage African-American
sailors to compete while loading ammunition and explo-
sives while officers placed bets among themselves;
Whereas following the explosion, many of the African-Amer-
ican survivors expected to be granted survivors’ leave be-
fore being reassigned to regular duty;
Whereas such leaves were not granted, even for those who
had been hospitalized, and all African-American men
were to be sent back to work loading ammunition under
the same officers as before;
Whereas White officers were allowed to go home for 30-day
leaves;
Whereas 50 sailors of the United States Navy, all African-
American men, ultimately were tried and convicted of
mutiny for failing to obey orders to resume loading ac-
tivities;
Whereas a refusal to work is a passive act of resistance with-
out intent to seize power;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4
•HRES 126 IH
Whereas a mutiny is active revolt with the intent of taking
charge;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall, then a chief counsel for the
NAACP, was reported as stating he saw no reason why
the men should be tried for mutiny, which implies a mass
conspiracy, rather than on lesser charges of individual
subordination;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall blasted the trial by stating that
the defendants were being tried for mutiny ‘‘solely be-
cause of their race and color’’;
Whereas the Navy has concluded that there can be ‘‘no doubt
that racial prejudice was responsible for the posting of
Afro-American enlisted personnel to the loading divisions
at Port Chicago’’;
Whereas similar racial prejudicial bias has been documented
in the conduct of the trial that resulted in the court-mar-
tial of the sailors at Port Chicago;
Whereas virtually all of the convicted sailors were released
from prison early in 1946 and discharged ‘‘under honor-
able conditions’’, and that the Navy announced then that
race would no longer be a factor in filling its jobs;
Whereas, in 1999, Freddie Meeks was pardoned by President
Bill Clinton in recognition of the injustice he suffered as
one of the convicted sailors;
Whereas Mr. Meeks said at the time of his pardon, ‘‘After
all these years, the world should know what happened at
Port Chicago. It should be cleared up that we did not
commit mutiny, and we were charged with that because
of our race.’’;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
5
•HRES 126 IH
Whereas, in 2003, the National Park Service dedicated the
Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial at the
disaster site;
Whereas the Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memo-
rial is not only a tribute to the 320 men who died in this
World War II explosion, but it also became the touch-
stone for desegregation in the military and the beginning
of civil rights for all Americans;
Whereas in a July 17, 2014, letter recognizing the 70th anni-
versary of the tragedy, President Barack Obama, in re-
gards to the African-American sailors at Port Chicago,
stated ‘‘faced with tremendous obstacles, they fought on
two fronts—for freedom and equality at home’’; and
Whereas while all sailors involved in the Port Chicago cases
have passed away, family members and friends continue
to request that the sailors be cleared of all charges: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep-
1
resentatives that—
2
(1) the trial and conviction of 50 African-Amer-
3
ican sailors of the United States Navy for mutiny in
4
connection with their service at the Port Chicago
5
Naval Magazine in Concord, California, during
6
World War II were wrongfully pursued because of
7
racial prejudice, as evidenced by the racial bias in
8
the Navy’s original findings in their cases and the
9
different treatment afforded to the convicted sailors’
10
White counterparts and officers; and
11
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
6
•HRES 126 IH
(2) Congress should publically exonerate the 50
1
Navy sailors in order to further aid in healing the
2
racial divide that continues to exist in the United
3
States.
4
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
03:44 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR126.IH
HR126
pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.