Federal
Authorizing the Speaker, on behalf of the House of Representatives, to intervene, otherwise appear, or take any other steps in the case of Texas v. United States, and in any appellate proceedings arising from such case, and for other purposes.
Source: Congress.gov ·
1,305 words in original text
Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
IV
116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
H. RES. 14
Authorizing the Speaker, on behalf of the House of Representatives, to inter-
vene, otherwise appear, or take any other steps in the case of Texas
v. United States, and in any appellate proceedings arising from such
case, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY 3, 2019
Mr. ALLRED (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. NEAL, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia,
Mr. NADLER, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms.
PELOSI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on House Admin-
istration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdic-
tion of the committee concerned
RESOLUTION
Authorizing the Speaker, on behalf of the House of Rep-
resentatives, to intervene, otherwise appear, or take any
other steps in the case of Texas v. United States, and
in any appellate proceedings arising from such case, and
for other purposes.
Whereas Texas, Wisconsin, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Governor
Paul LePage of Maine, Mississippi (by and through Gov-
ernor Phil Bryant), Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota,
South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and
West Virginia have filed suit in the United States Dis-
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:00 Jan 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR14.IH
HR14
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2
•HRES 14 IH
trict Court for the Northern District of Texas, arguing
that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 119) is unconstitutional
and should be enjoined by asserting that the Act’s re-
quirement to maintain minimum essential coverage (com-
monly known as the ‘‘individual responsibility provision’’)
in section 5000A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, is unconstitutional following the amendment of
that provision by the Act to provide for reconciliation
pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution
on the budget for fiscal year 2018 (Public Law 115–97)
(commonly known as the ‘‘Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’’);
Whereas these State and individual plaintiffs also seek to
strike down the entire Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act as not severable from the individual responsi-
bility provision;
Whereas, on June 7, 2018, the Department of Justice re-
fused to defend the constitutionality of the amended indi-
vidual responsibility provision, despite the well-established
duty of the Department to defend Federal statutes where
reasonable arguments can be made in their defense;
Whereas the Department of Justice not only refused to de-
fend the amended individual responsibility provision, but
affirmatively argued that this provision is unconstitu-
tional and that the provisions of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act guaranteeing issuance of health
insurance coverage regardless of health status or pre-
existing conditions (commonly known as the ‘‘guaranteed
issue provision’’) found in sections 2702, 2704, and
2705(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
300gg–1, 300gg–3, 300gg–4(a)) and prohibitions on dis-
criminatory premium rates (commonly known as the
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:00 Jan 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR14.IH
HR14
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3
•HRES 14 IH
‘‘community rating provision’’) found in sections 2701
and 2705(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
300gg(a)(1), 300gg–4(b)) must now be struck down as
not severable from the individual responsibility provision;
Whereas the district court recently held that the individual
responsibility provision is unconstitutional and that all of
the remaining provisions of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care act are inseverable and therefore invalid;
Whereas up to 133 million nonelderly Americans have some
type of preexisting health condition, such as, but not lim-
ited to, diabetes, high cholesterol, cancer, arthritis, and
asthma, that could affect their insurance;
Whereas prior to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and the enactment of protections such as guaranteed
issue and community rating, millions of Americans were
denied health insurance coverage, were unable to obtain
coverage of necessary medical services, or were priced out
of the individual market due to preexisting conditions;
Whereas without such protections for preexisting conditions,
millions of Americans could once again lose access to af-
fordable, comprehensive health insurance;
Whereas more than 13 million Americans who gained cov-
erage in States that expanded Medicaid eligibility under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could
lose coverage if the Act were struck down in its entirety;
Whereas more than 2 million young adults who gained cov-
erage under a provision of the Patient Protection and Af-
fordable Care Act allowing individuals under the age of
26 to stay on their parents’ insurance could lose coverage
if the Act were struck down in its entirety;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:00 Jan 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR14.IH
HR14
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4
•HRES 14 IH
Whereas more than 8.9 million low and middle-income Ameri-
cans who received tax credits averaging $520 per month
to help pay for health insurance in the individual market
under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
could lose coverage if the Act were struck down in its en-
tirety;
Whereas an estimated 105 million Americans who now enjoy
coverage without lifetime limits due to the Patient Pro-
tection and Affordable Care Act could once again face
lifetime limits on their benefits if the Act were struck
down in its entirety; and
Whereas nearly 12 million Medicare beneficiaries who re-
ceived an average of $2,200 in savings on prescription
drugs due to the closing of the Medicare prescription
drug donut hole under the Patient Protection and Afford-
able Care Act would face rising drug costs if the Act
were struck down in its entirety: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved,
1
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING LEGAL ACTION BY HOUSE.
2
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Speaker, on behalf of the
3
House of Representatives, is authorized to intervene, oth-
4
erwise appear, or take any other steps in the case of Texas
5
v. United States, No. 4:18–cv–00167–O (N.D. Tex.) and
6
in any appellate proceedings arising from such case. The
7
Speaker, in consultation with the Bipartisan Legal Advi-
8
sory Group, is also authorized to intervene, otherwise ap-
9
pear, or take any other steps in any other cases involving
10
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to protect
11
the institutional interests of the House and to defend such
12
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:00 Jan 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR14.IH
HR14
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
5
•HRES 14 IH
Act, the amendments made by such Act to other provisions
1
of law, and any amendments to such provisions, including
2
the provisions ensuring affordable health coverage for
3
those with preexisting conditions.
4
(b) ROLE OF GENERAL COUNSEL.—The Office of
5
General Counsel of the House of Representatives, at the
6
direction of the Speaker, shall represent the House in any
7
litigation pursuant to this title. The Office of General
8
Counsel may employ the services of outside counsel, in-
9
cluding pro bono counsel, or other experts for this pur-
10
pose.
11
(c) REPORTS ON AMOUNTS EXPENDED.—The chair
12
of the Committee on House Administration shall cause to
13
be printed in the Congressional Record a statement setting
14
forth the aggregate amounts expended by the Office of
15
General Counsel on outside counsel and other experts pur-
16
suant to this title on a quarterly basis, and such statement
17
shall be submitted for printing not more than 30 days
18
after the expiration of each such quarter.
19
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
22:00 Jan 04, 2019
Jkt 089200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR14.IH
HR14
kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.