← Back to results
Federal

Taiwan Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2023

Source: Congress.gov  ·  1,427 words in original text
This bill allows the President to loan or lease military equipment (called defense articles) to Taiwan's government. The goal is to strengthen Taiwan's ability to defend itself against potential attacks by China's military. Taiwan must pay for repairs if the equipment gets damaged, or pay the replacement cost if it gets lost or destroyed.
The President and presidential officials who handle military loans. Taiwan's government. The Secretary of Defense. Congress. Taiwan's military and population.
• The President can loan or lease military equipment to Taiwan to help it defend against attacks from China's military, including naval blockades, ground invasions, missile strikes, or attacks on Taiwan's outlying islands. (Sec. 2(b)(1)) • Taiwan must pay the cost of repairing any loaned or leased equipment that gets damaged, or pay the full replacement cost (minus depreciation) if equipment is lost or destroyed. (Sec. 2(b)(1)) • The President can finance Taiwan's purchase of military services and construction services related to the loaned or leased equipment, but Taiwan must repay this financing within 12 years with interest. (Sec. 2(b)(3)(A)) • The President must create fast-track procedures within 60 days to ensure quick delivery of any loaned or leased military equipment to Taiwan. (Sec. 2(d)) • The Secretary of Defense must report to Congress within 90 days listing which military equipment would be appropriate to loan or lease to Taiwan, including delivery timelines and any supply chain challenges. (Sec. 2(e)(1))
If this becomes law, the President gains new power to loan military equipment to Taiwan outside existing restrictions in the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act. The military relationship between the United States and Taiwan expands to include loaned or leased defense articles. A formal process for delivering this equipment quickly gets established.
The bill uses the terms "defense article," "defense service," and "design and construction services." It states these terms have the same meanings given in section 47 of the Arms Export Control Act, but the bill itself does not define them separately.
Not specified in bill text
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov or a qualified attorney for legal matters.