Plain English summary not yet available
The full original text is available below. Check back soon as we process this bill.
I
117TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 1905
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to allow the sponsor
of a drug to use a non-animal test as an alternative to an animal
test for purposes of demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of a
drug if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 16, 2021
Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania (for himself, Ms. DEAN, Mr.
FITZPATRICK, and Mr. HASTINGS) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to
allow the sponsor of a drug to use a non-animal test
as an alternative to an animal test for purposes of dem-
onstrating the safety and effectiveness of a drug if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:14 May 11, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1905.IH
H1905
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 1905 IH
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
1
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alternatives to Ani-
2
mals for Regulatory Fairness Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘AARF
3
Act of 2021’’.
4
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
5
The Congress finds that—
6
(1) the Food and Drug Administration (in this
7
section referred to as the ‘‘FDA’’) often requires
8
pharmaceutical companies to conduct or commission
9
testing on dogs and other animals to assess the safe-
10
ty or effectiveness of new drugs, even though such
11
testing is inefficient, expensive, and ineffective;
12
(2) the National Institutes of Health states,
13
‘‘Approximately 30 percent of promising medications
14
have failed in human clinical trials because they are
15
found to be toxic despite promising preclinical stud-
16
ies in animal models. About 60 percent of candidate
17
drugs fail due to lack of efficacy’’;
18
(3) current FDA nonbinding pharmaceutical
19
testing guidelines support the use of alternatives to
20
animal testing to improve the effectiveness and effi-
21
ciency of drug development;
22
(4) current FDA drug testing guidance for the
23
pharmaceutical
industry
states,
‘‘consideration
24
should be given to use of new in vitro alternative
25
methods for safety evaluation’’;
26
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:14 May 11, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1905.IH
H1905
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 1905 IH
(5) the FDA’s drug testing guidance for indus-
1
try additionally states, ‘‘alternative approaches . . .
2
can also be used . . . . The use of any of these ap-
3
proaches can reduce overall animal use in drug de-
4
velopment’’;
5
(6) the FDA writes that alternatives to animal
6
testing, ‘‘may help bring FDA-regulated products to
7
market faster, with improved efficacy, or prevent
8
products with increased toxicological risk from
9
reaching the market. Also critical is the potential for
10
these advances to replace, reduce, and/or refine ani-
11
mal testing’’;
12
(7) pharmaceutical companies are reducing ani-
13
mal testing by investing in the development and use
14
of alternative methods, which studies show are often
15
more effective and efficient than traditional animal
16
use;
17
(8) the FDA states, ‘‘FDA encourages sponsors
18
to consult with us if they wish to use a non-animal
19
testing method they believe is suitable, adequate,
20
validated, and feasible’’; and
21
(9) in some cases, drug manufacturers and
22
sponsors have not been allowed by the FDA to use
23
alternatives to animal testing to fulfill regulatory re-
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:14 May 11, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H1905.IH
H1905
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 1905 IH
quirements, despite the FDA’s support for this tech-
1
nology in its industry guidance document.
2
SEC. 3. ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTS.
3
Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
4
Act (21 U.S.C. 355) is amended by adding at the end the
5
following new subsection:
6
‘‘(z) ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTS.—The Sec-
7
retary shall allow the sponsor of a drug to use a non-ani-
8
mal test as an alternative to an animal test for purposes
9
of demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of a drug
10
under this section if such approach satisfies the require-
11
ments of the applicable statutes and regulations.’’.
12
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:14 May 11, 2021
Jkt 019200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H1905.IH
H1905
pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Important: This plain English summary was generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only.
It is not legal advice. Always consult the official bill text on Congress.gov
or a qualified attorney for legal matters.